- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Trump EPA to cut Energy Star program.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:06 am
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:06 am
Ebell says companies should set their own definitions and standards:
Ebell’s team disbanded in January and did not write Trump’s budget plan, which envisions a privatization scheme where industry would set its own definitions for what products are efficient and police standards itself. But the team provided the administration with a confidential list of proposals aimed at helping the president fulfill his stated goal during the campaign of shrinking the agency as much as possible. Ebell has been one of the most visible critics of voluntary government energy efficiency programs like Energy Star.
“The EPA is meant to improve environmental quality,” said Ebell, director of environmental initiatives at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a libertarian think tank on the forefront of disputing the scientific consensus on climate change, as well as the health impacts of tobacco. “I’m not sure what that has to do with how much energy consumers use. But a great deal of the work at EPA has been dedicated to that. The president made clear during the campaign he will get rid of as much of that as he possibly can.”
The voluntary program’s legions of loyalists say Energy Star has everything to with environmental quality. The nation’s biggest companies compete aggressively to win Energy Star labels for their products, which signal to consumers that everything from the air conditioners they purchase at Best Buy to the buildings where they lease office space engage advanced technologies to use the least possible amount of power. The eagerness to meet consumer demand for that seal of approval has driven firms to invest big in cutting energy use.
Energy Star has been a pillar of the federal government’s effort to fight climate change, with the EPA boasting that it has kept some 2.8 billion tons of greenhouse gas from escaping into the atmosphere — or roughly the equivalent produced from powering 36 million homes with electricity each year. It has enabled consumers and businesses to cut their energy bills more than $30 billion per year.
At an annual cost of $60 million to taxpayers, it is easily the cheapest and least burdensome initiative the federal government runs to help Americans lower their energy consumption. States have latched onto the program, awarding their own rebates and other incentives to utility customers who use Energy Star products.
LINK
NOTHING CAN GO WRONG HERE!!!
Ebell’s team disbanded in January and did not write Trump’s budget plan, which envisions a privatization scheme where industry would set its own definitions for what products are efficient and police standards itself. But the team provided the administration with a confidential list of proposals aimed at helping the president fulfill his stated goal during the campaign of shrinking the agency as much as possible. Ebell has been one of the most visible critics of voluntary government energy efficiency programs like Energy Star.
“The EPA is meant to improve environmental quality,” said Ebell, director of environmental initiatives at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, a libertarian think tank on the forefront of disputing the scientific consensus on climate change, as well as the health impacts of tobacco. “I’m not sure what that has to do with how much energy consumers use. But a great deal of the work at EPA has been dedicated to that. The president made clear during the campaign he will get rid of as much of that as he possibly can.”
The voluntary program’s legions of loyalists say Energy Star has everything to with environmental quality. The nation’s biggest companies compete aggressively to win Energy Star labels for their products, which signal to consumers that everything from the air conditioners they purchase at Best Buy to the buildings where they lease office space engage advanced technologies to use the least possible amount of power. The eagerness to meet consumer demand for that seal of approval has driven firms to invest big in cutting energy use.
Energy Star has been a pillar of the federal government’s effort to fight climate change, with the EPA boasting that it has kept some 2.8 billion tons of greenhouse gas from escaping into the atmosphere — or roughly the equivalent produced from powering 36 million homes with electricity each year. It has enabled consumers and businesses to cut their energy bills more than $30 billion per year.
At an annual cost of $60 million to taxpayers, it is easily the cheapest and least burdensome initiative the federal government runs to help Americans lower their energy consumption. States have latched onto the program, awarding their own rebates and other incentives to utility customers who use Energy Star products.
LINK
NOTHING CAN GO WRONG HERE!!!
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:07 am to TJGator1215
TugJob, didn't read, voted down 
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:08 am to TJGator1215
Yep, I know the "Energy Star" rating has been tops of my list of things to consider when buying any appliance... 
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:08 am to TJGator1215
You copied/wrote all that to make $0.01 you must have a really pathetic life.
This post was edited on 4/12/17 at 9:09 am
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:08 am to TJGator1215
Sorry I don't give a frick about Energy Star programs
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:11 am to TJGator1215
Good. No one gaf about this stupid shite.
Low power consumption is a competitive advantage that will happen naturally in a free marketplace.
Low power consumption is a competitive advantage that will happen naturally in a free marketplace.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:12 am to TJGator1215
The EPA is a shite show. They are the reason a washer and dryer are only good for 4 or 5 years now instead of 15-20 years.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:12 am to TJGator1215
Has it made a statistically significant difference in "climate change"? What is the quantifiable difference it has made on the end result? How are we better off?
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:12 am to TJGator1215
I didn't read all that drivel but I'll just say that the government doesn't any longer need to make demands on appliances. Let the manufacturers compete against each other by offering their energy efficient products at the best cost to the consumer.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:14 am to redfishfan
Emmisions tiers in farm and construction equipment have added tens of thousands of dollars to the price of machines, added user and technical complexity, while reducing the fuel economy of the machine.
Government doesn't always know best.
Government doesn't always know best.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:15 am to Pecker
Wait until your parents stop paying for your crap. You will.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:16 am to TJGator1215
Why should lowering energy usage be a mandate of the EPA?
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:16 am to redfishfan
"The EPA is a shite show. They are the reason a washer and dryer are only good for 4 or 5 years now instead of 15-20 years."
When can I have my normal light bulbs back? My stash will eventually run out!
When can I have my normal light bulbs back? My stash will eventually run out!
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:17 am to TJGator1215
If we have an unlimited supply of NG why would we need an energy star program?
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:18 am to TJGator1215
does that come in stainless steel?
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:19 am to TJGator1215
I see you have your four alter accounts up and running this am.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:20 am to Paluka
quote:
They are the reason a washer and dryer are only good for 4 or 5 years now instead of 15-20 years."
Had a service tech tell me years ago there is a reason manufacturers went to plastic parts instead of metal.
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:20 am to tedmarkuson
Shadow libs are downvoting the frick out of these responses. Lol
Posted on 4/12/17 at 9:21 am to TJGator1215
Programs and Features...Energy Star....delete
Popular
Back to top

21








