Started By
Message

re: Seahawks released Michael, Packers claimed him

Posted on 11/16/16 at 9:42 am to
Posted by GOON
Fantasy Land
Member since Mar 2008
7399 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 9:42 am to
"GUYS GUYS, I have a blog that I won't share with you where I predict everything that's ever happened! PLEASE LOVE ME"

BMB
Posted by monkeybutt
Member since Oct 2015
4583 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 10:17 am to
quote:

My Blog entry on Friday covered why he was about to be released from the standpoint of beefing up the Seattle roster for a championship run. He was one of 3 I mentioned. 2 more to be cut before end of next week. I cover every team every week.



But, but... I thought he had the job on lockdown?
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72104 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 3:23 pm to
Packers claimed CM
Posted by txpurpleandgold
Member since Nov 2005
1030 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 3:33 pm to
IT'S HAPPENING!!!!!


j/k, he'll be mediocre at best
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158835 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 3:38 pm to
they didn't quite get their fill off one metric phenom, going for seconds
Posted by OneMoreTime
Florida Gulf Coast Fan
Member since Dec 2008
61837 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 3:38 pm to
Link to your blog?
Posted by TigerLunatik
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2005
93940 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 3:45 pm to
So, what does this mean for Starks? ESPN's update says that Starks will be relegated to change of pace back and that Michael's only competition for touches will be Montgomery. I really have a hard time seeing that. Thoughts?
Posted by VermilionTiger
Member since Dec 2012
37631 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 3:52 pm to
Glad I didn't pick up Starks this morning
Posted by NOFOX
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2014
9963 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

About to get claimed by the Packers and go ham.


Nice call
Posted by DeathValley85
Member since May 2011
17275 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 4:33 pm to
Posted by oncealurker
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2013
5064 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 4:34 pm to
Starks is and will remain the starter. C-Mike is not good and Montgomery is dealing with health issues, in addition to not being a prototypical runningback. Starks had double digits points his first game back and will be fine going forward. Not a great play, but a solid flex play each week.
Posted by GynoSandberg
Member since Jan 2006
72104 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 4:52 pm to


quote:

I own James Starks

Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
82098 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 4:52 pm to
Meh Starks hasn't been good this year either, but he has the advantage of having been there for years and having the trust of the coaches and Rodgers
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158835 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 4:53 pm to
but you predicted he was going to be the truth, why would they cut him boat?
Posted by oncealurker
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2013
5064 posts
Posted on 11/16/16 at 5:14 pm to
He played one game
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram