Do the Saints really need a DT at No. 12?

As chad said "Get the player/s that plays the SACK THE QUARTERBACK position".

Or something like that.

I say yes because we just drafted 2 LBs in the first 2 rounds last year and we need a monster in the middle to eat up the blocks and let those backers roam and make plays

They need the BPA

We need someone who will be elite. A gamechanger. On the defensive line. Our defense was so bad because quarterbacks had so long to throw. No matter how great your secondary is, they can't cover for 5+ seconds every single play because no one is getting to the quarterback.

And I'm tired of the "draft a WR in the first" narrative. Drew Brees just showed us he can get it done with literal walk ons. Give him another guard and we'll have 4/5 solid starters on the line and Drew will tear apart the defense apart like usual. He's showed his whole career he doesn't need great receivers to win games. The defense is holding us back.

Triplet just put out that he has D Tackle at 3rd most important position to upgrade, behind DE and OLB, unsure about the order yet though. I don't believe we have to go DT here, we have to get the guy we feel will be best at one of these 3 positions though. I say that because it just so happens the Scouts Inc has 15 of their top 32 prospects in this draft play those 3 positions, so we should be able to find a top player that fills a serious need. also, 21 of the top 50 play those 3, so we don't have to circle a position with the first pick. Obviously these rankings will change after the combine and will continue to shift throughout the lead up to the draft, but it's very promising that the draft is loaded with talent at spots where we need it.

It's been a busy year, so I don't know much about the players in this draft yet. I do know that a few of the "experts" are saying that the DL is the strongest in many years with 1st round type guys being available in Rds 2-3.


If this is the case, then I believe we go BPA at some other position. WR, OG, S, CB, OLB, TE are all need spots. Unless there's an all-world DL at 12, I would go with one of these other positions first.

Then again, our DL needs 2 players, so why not got DL 2 out of the first 3 rounds? Since it is this strong, let's solidify the line.

We talk about it every year, but this year seems an ideal time to move back and pick up a 3rd or 2nd, even if it means missing out on Treadwell or Smith.

Assuming our #1 need, which I think many can agree on, is DT. At 12, we miss out on Buckner, but there are so many other comparable 1st round DTs that having the pick of the litter may or may not matter at 12 compared to say 22.

I say 22 because that is where the lovely QB-less Houston Texans are. At 12, if a guy like Lynch is available (I say that because Goff is probably the 2nd overall pick) and Houston is afraid another QB-needy team like the Eagles (13) or Rams (15) may take him and he's there guy, I think they would give up a pick to move up.

According to the "draft value" chart, our 12th values at 1200, their 22 values at 780, and their 2nd rounder (52nd) values at 380.

quote:

---

Kiper stated he had 25 defensive line prospects with first or second round grades.

---

Cool. Hope we draft two in the first two rounds.

If a position has high value in the draft where you can get quality guys in the 2nd or 3rd then you go with best player available in the draft. If that's a DT, take him but you should seriously consider how deep the DL class is before you draft one whereas if you took an amazing LB that has equal value it might be a smarter pick due to how deep it is on DL.

DT is one of the highest bust % in the NFL coming from draft too. They're not an easy position to evaluate compared to something like LB where they're usually considered safer picks.