Started By
Message

NCAA says prop 1 effects Houston as a hosting site

Posted on 11/4/15 at 6:55 pm
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36781 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 6:55 pm
quote:

HOUSTON – A day after voters struck down an anti-discrimination ordinance that created protections for gay and transgendered people in Houston, the NFL issued a statement saying the league will not alter plans to have the city host Super Bowl LI in 2017. The NCAA, however, said that while it won't impact the 2016 Final Four, it could deter future events in the city.


quote:

The ordinance, which was put in place by Houston's city council in May of 2014, made it more difficult for individuals or businesses to deny services, housing and employment to others on the basis of age, race, sexual identity and gender identity. Opposing lawmakers fought to have the ordinance struck down, and the Texas Supreme Court required the ordinance go to a vote, where it was repealed by a roughly 60-40 percent margin on Tuesday. Among the arguments, opponents of the ordinance argued that it could aid sexual predators by allowing men to use a sexual identity claim to enter women's bathrooms and then commit assaults. The mayor of Houston, Annice Parker, called that campaign one of "fear-mongering and deliberate lies" and framed the failure of the ordinance as a broad stroke of injustice.

LINK

quote:

The NFL's stance was softer, as it made clear the repeal will not impact Houston as a Super Bowl city. "This will not affect our plans for Super Bowl LI in 2017," NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy said in a statement. "We will work closely with the Houston Super Bowl Host Committee to make sure all fans feel welcomed at our events. Our policies emphasize tolerance and inclusiveness, and prohibit discrimination based on age, gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, or any other improper standard."


Their notification on my phone was better clickbait

quote:

NFL won't alter Houston Super Bowl plans after city's repeal of non-discrimination law

This post was edited on 11/4/15 at 7:00 pm
Posted by Wally Sparks
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2013
29315 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 6:56 pm to
Of fricking course.
Posted by BraveTiger225
Atlanta, GA
Member since May 2008
17662 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 6:58 pm to
quote:

Our policies emphasize tolerance and inclusiveness, and prohibit discrimination based on age, gender, race, religion, sexual orientation, or any other improper standard."


But dat money doe....
Posted by Lsuhoohoo
Member since Sep 2007
94981 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 7:32 pm to
In my eyes, the NCAA doesn't exist to be a sociopolitical lobbying organization. But what do I know.
Posted by ChunkyLover54
Member since Apr 2015
6544 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 7:37 pm to
This is about allowing men, dressed as women, to use women's bathrooms and vice versa?
Posted by msutiger
Shreveport
Member since Jul 2008
69701 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 7:40 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/10/23 at 2:35 pm
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71627 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 7:45 pm to
So they have no problem making money off college players while being a non-profit, but this is the line in the sand? Nice.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59166 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 7:45 pm to
So the fact the Houston did not have this ordinance in place when ever they picked the 2016 FF didn't bother them, but now that Houston still doesn't have it, it is a problem?

quote:

Our policies emphasize tolerance and inclusiveness, and prohibit discrimination based on age, gender, race, religion, sexual orientation


all those groups are protected under existing federal laws at a bare minimum.
Posted by stat19
Member since Feb 2011
29350 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 8:18 pm to
Good! Now if every city in the United States votes to disallow grown men in dresses from hanging out in high girls lockers room and taking care of waste disposal in women's restrooms, then the NCAA and the NFL will quit trying to force the fantasy, politically correct mind control and scare tactics over everyone.

Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56623 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 8:59 pm to
It wasn't a "non-discrimination" policy. It was a "bend over backwards to accommodate .0001% of the population" ordinance.
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164554 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 9:07 pm to
I don't care as long as Benny Simmons and the Tigers will still win the national championship 3.5 hours away in Houston.
Posted by lsutiger2010
Member since Aug 2008
14790 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 10:02 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/20/21 at 10:18 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99601 posts
Posted on 11/4/15 at 11:42 pm to
quote:

could
Posted by Dalosaqy
I can't quite re
Member since Dec 2007
12320 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 3:19 am to
So the premise was that men will undergo a permanent sex change in order to gain entry into women's restrooms?
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 6:44 am to
The "Fighting Illini" are A-OK but the "Fighting Sioux" just HAD to go immediately because the "Fighting Illini" have a lot more influence.

Like typical liberals the assclowns at the NCAA are gutless cowards who have no regard for consistency.

Now they want to preach about this bullshite ordinance.

Well frick them.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram