- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Those People Anti Organic Foods
Posted on 12/4/14 at 1:18 am
Posted on 12/4/14 at 1:18 am
Do U not buy organic foods? Do U not go to organic sections in grocery stores?
Why not?
Why not?
Posted on 12/4/14 at 1:20 am to regularshow
Is this a three part question?
Posted on 12/4/14 at 1:25 am to regularshow
I think there are some organic foods that are ripoffs.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 1:31 am to regularshow
To answer your questions, I don't shop in the organic aisle. It's too expensive and I haven't died from eating non organic yet.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 1:33 am to Degas
You know, there is a 100% chance of death if you strictly eat organic foods
Posted on 12/4/14 at 1:37 am to regularshow
I grab organic stuff, but when I go to the self checkout, I ring it up as regular produce
Problems solved
Problems solved
Posted on 12/4/14 at 6:47 am to Deactived
I generally buy organic carrots and potatoes....chem residues concentrate in soil, and root veg have prolonged soil contact.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 6:54 am to regularshow
quote:
Do U not buy organic foods?
not all the time, sometimes I do if the fruits and veggies look better
I don't buy organic boxed food. That's retarded.
quote:
Do U not go to organic sections in grocery stores?
I do check them out
quote:
Why not?
I don't buy 100% organic all the time because the organic you buy in the grocery store is hardly what anyone would consider "organic". It just means it meets this very iffy definition of "organic" defined by the USDA.
I try to buy directly from local farmers as much as I can. Most of them are not "certified organic" though.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 7:58 am to regularshow
quote:
Why not?
I don't buy organic because theres no proof that its healthier, paying a premium to buy organic is rewarding inefficient farming/land usage and ultimately organic farming can prove harmful to the environment.
There's really no conclusive data that says that organic produce is any better for you than traditionally farmed produce. Period...
Modern intensive farming is more efficient in that the amount of produce created per acre is often as much as 10 times greater than organic farming. As a result, if organic farming were to continue to flourish things such as forests may have to be sacrificed in order to keep up. Way to go organics!
What's more, organic farming refuses to use traditional fertilization and often chooses cow manure instead. Again, the implication here is that if demand for manure increases we must have more cows and as it works out cows are a major source of methane which has been proven to deplete the ozone layer. Again, wiping out forests and depleting ozone seems like a bad idea to me.
Only in America would things like organic produce take off. Like drinking a $6 Starbucks latte or wearing a Rolex watch buying organic is nothing more than a fad and perceived status symbol.
The only time I buy organic is in the rare instance that its actually cheaper.
This post was edited on 12/4/14 at 8:02 am
Posted on 12/4/14 at 8:00 am to regularshow
I sometimes buy organic but not often. I suspect that it's dubious as to whether it lives up to what it's proclaimed to be. Just like free range chicken mmeans only that instead of living in a cage, a thousand chickens are allowed to "range" in a 2000 sq ft pen.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 9:12 am to Jake88
quote:
What's more, organic farming refuses to use traditional fertilization and often chooses cow manure instead. Again, the implication here is that if demand for manure increases we must have more cows and as it works out cows are a major source of methane which has been proven to deplete the ozone layer. Again, wiping out forests and depleting ozone seems like a bad idea to me.
By this line of reasoning, you should also avoid eating beef. I'm curious: do you?
Cow manure is far from the principal source of nitrogen input for organic farming. Nitrogen-fixing cover crops (alfalfa, cowpeas, etc) are widely used, as are things like cottonseed meal, chicken droppings, and composted field leftovers (cornstalks, leftover pea vines, veg plants post harvest, some after "vermicomposting", aka being eaten by worms). Fish meal, algae derived fertilizers....there's a huge world beyond cow manure.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 9:18 am to hungryone
I don't buy organic because of threads like this. I'm not joking by saying that.
I figure that if there is that much controversy about it here, it's not worth the extra money.
And I'm with Degas on this as well.
I figure that if there is that much controversy about it here, it's not worth the extra money.
And I'm with Degas on this as well.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 9:40 am to regularshow
quote:
Do U not buy organic foods? Do U not go to organic sections in grocery stores? Why not?
I hated organic chemistry and am forced to do it every day.
Inorganics are where it's at.
I can smell hippy feet and cow shite whenever I walk through the organic section of Piggly Wiggly and I don't like it.
Nuff said.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 9:40 am to regularshow
I got some organic gluten free brown rice a while back (Bob's red mill). It's been on the shelf in the pantry for a while.
I saw some dark specs and thought it looked like wild rice. They were beetles. The bag was still air tight, which means the eggs were in there and hatched.
I'll just stick to pesticides.
I saw some dark specs and thought it looked like wild rice. They were beetles. The bag was still air tight, which means the eggs were in there and hatched.
I'll just stick to pesticides.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 9:41 am to regularshow
I buy whatever looks the best at the best price and is the most convenient for me. If organic corn or some shite is on sale for less than regular corn, sure I'll pick it up if it looks alright. If I'm driving down the road and remember the Tuesday farmer's market is a few blocks away, I'll swing by and pick up some veggies, which may or may not be organic. If I'm in the supermarket and organic bell peppers are $2/ea and non-organic are 2 for $1, then you better believe I'm buying the non-organic ones.
I lump anti-organic people in with climate change deniers. I lump organic-only people in with gluten-free people. Broad brushes, I'm aware.
All that said, the organic stuff that comes out of my MIL's garden tastes awesome and much better than regular supermarket veggies and fruit.
I lump anti-organic people in with climate change deniers. I lump organic-only people in with gluten-free people. Broad brushes, I'm aware.
All that said, the organic stuff that comes out of my MIL's garden tastes awesome and much better than regular supermarket veggies and fruit.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 9:47 am to hungryone
quote:
By this line of reasoning, you should also avoid eating beef. I'm curious: do you? Cow manure is far from the principal source of nitrogen input for organic farming. Nitrogen-fixing cover crops (alfalfa, cowpeas, etc) are widely used, as are things like cottonseed meal, chicken droppings, and composted field leftovers (cornstalks, leftover pea vines, veg plants post harvest, some after "vermicomposting", aka being eaten by worms). Fish meal, algae derived fertilizers....there's a huge world beyond cow manure.
I eat the hell out beef without even the slightest hesitation. The smaller the feed lot and more GMO corn she's been fed the better as far as I'm concerned.
This chicken crap and pea vine theory is all good and well, but inefficiently growing one crop to simply put it on top of another crop is just the kind of land use inefficiency I'm talking about. Find me an example where vermicomposting proves as cost effective and produces yields comparable to traditional fertilization methods and we'll talk. Let's confront reality here... if chicken crap, corn stalks and fish meal were more efficient than fertilizer then America's farmers would be all over it.
I get it, some folks are eager to drink the Jim Jones Kool-Aid as it relates to organics. I'm just here because the OP was looking for someone to give the contrarian viewpoint.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 9:47 am to Dooshay
quote:
They were beetles. The bag was still air tight, which means the eggs were in there and hatched.
Need to throw that stuff away in the outside trash can. They will eat their way out and infest everything in your cabinet and then come and crawl up your nose and infect your brain while you are sleeping. Organic brown rice eating beetles (Beetelictium orgbrnricnium) are well known for doing that.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 9:59 am to MeridianDog
quote:
This chicken crap and pea vine theory is all good and well, but inefficiently growing one crop to simply put it on top of another crop is just the kind of land use inefficiency I'm talking about.
Ever heard of crop rotation? It's a standard part of even conventional (non organic) farming. Land use efficiency in farming isn't what you'd think...how you use it depends on available water, soil chemistry & composition, etc. Poor soils are a production problem worldwide--merely dumping fertilizers won't magically create productivity.
Have you read Howard Buffett's (Warren's son) book "Forty Chances: Hope in a Hungry World"? He's a farmer...intensive monocrop midwestern farming, right in the middle of the corn & soybean heartland. He's also a philanthropist, conservationist, and supporter of improving agriculture in the hungriest parts of the world. You mentioned efficient land use, and he funds several large-scale experimental farms (including a big one in South Africa), where various techniques are tested.
Posted on 12/4/14 at 10:39 am to wiltznucs
quote:
inefficiently growing one crop to simply put it on top of another crop is just the kind of land use inefficiency I'm talking about.
Who gives a shite about inefficient land use here in the US? If growing organic crops is economical for the landowner and he/she is not reliant on farm subsidies, then what is the big deal?
If you are really that concerned about the efficient use of arable land for food then stop wearing cotton based clothes and only sport manmade fibers. Cotton covers a lot more land than organic produce and no one eats it.
This post was edited on 12/4/14 at 11:02 am
Posted on 12/4/14 at 10:46 am to NOFOX
Nitrogen is nitrogen whether it comes for a bottle in the lab or a bull's arse. I'm not paying the premium for bullshite.
Popular
Back to top

10










