Started By
Message

re: What did Stephen A. Smith say?

Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:25 pm to
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
142690 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

Michelle Beadle @MichelleDBeadle · 41m One thousand dollars for a translation here
racist cracka ho
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
35583 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:26 pm to
As dumb as SAS's little rant was, I think beadle's response is even dumber.

SAS is talking about hitting women and Beadle leaps head first into the worn out "you're a rape apologist" meme. I don't think SAS's rant had shite to do with rape/sexual assault.
Posted by Scrowe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2010
2926 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Insinuating that the we should also not forget the woman's role in getting herself beat up is a pretty stupid stance.


I think it's more of him saying that women don't need to push the issue. Who hasn't dealt with a woman that keeps pushing the issue or pushing your buttons whenever she knows you're mad. Not to mention there are those that think that they can put their hands on you because they are a woman and no matter how far they take it even it's striking you in the head or face a man should just sit there and take it while they pile it on.

I think he's saying that if you don't want to fall victim to domestic violence and want a man to respect you enough not to hit you, then respect him and don't act in a manner that could incite a such a response. It's completely understandable. If you don't want to get stung by bees do you just sit there and poke the hive until it happens or do you take actions to keep from being in that situation?

As he said as well, there are some people who are just evil and use violence without provocation.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424431 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

Women should have to go out of their way to make sure they don't provoke a man into beating them?

nope

that's not what people are saying at all

they're saying she should be mindful of a scenario where she at risk of being hit and not to exacerbate it into getting hit. even if they can muster a proportional response, she still loses in the end (by getting hit)
Posted by lpgreat1
Monroe, LA
Member since Nov 2007
1509 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:29 pm to
I have seen women attack men physically before, sometimes with justification. I have also seen women verbally taunt men to an extreme. Women who do those sorts of things are "provoking." Most often, they act in those ways because they feel "safe" from being physically engaged by the man because they are female.
Posted by gadknot
Reality
Member since Jul 2005
37306 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

I think it's more of him saying that women don't need to push the issue. Who hasn't dealt with a woman that keeps pushing the issue or pushing your buttons whenever she knows you're mad.


Don't most sane men walk away at this point? I understand that there are crazy women but its hard for me find an excuse to beat a woman like Ray Rice did. And if I were on national tv I wouldn't think about even hinting towards the argument that we need to evaluate the woman's role in getting beat up. You're not going to win there
Posted by Haughton99
Haughton
Member since Feb 2009
6124 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:32 pm to
quote:

Women should have to go out of their way to make sure they don't provoke a man into beating them?


quote:

she should be mindful of a scenario where she at risk of being hit and not to exacerbate it into getting hit.


These two sentences say the exact same thing.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
424431 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

These two sentences say the exact same thing.

no they're not

one assumes a neutral/rational setting that a stimulus is interjected within

the other assumes a much more emotional/irrational setting where an emotional, possibly physical, response is more likely

he's discussing the latter, and advising for women not to inject their own emotional/physical responses in those scenarios

women or no women. that's good advice
This post was edited on 7/25/14 at 2:36 pm
Posted by Scrowe
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2010
2926 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

Don't most sane men walk away at this point?


You can try, that doesn't always work. Try to continue walking away as you're getting slapped in the back of the head. Takes a lot of will power to continue. Then there is trying to walk away only to have the person run around you and block your way out the room. Another fun scenario.

Hitting a women is not something I condone by any means, but I've been put in situations where I can see how things can escalate with people who have shorter tempers.
Posted by vengeanceofrain
depends
Member since Jun 2013
12465 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:45 pm to
He's not talking about women wearing pumps and mini skirts at night.


i once had a chick throw a glass vase at my head becuase I broke up with her. That's the type of shite that gets your arse whipped. I would have broke that broad if I felt like it, she knew it, I knew it, bu she still threw the vase at my head.


lol I remember one day I was at a high school football game and I was just wondering along, going in to the game, minding my own business, and this chick rushed me bucase she apparently thought I was someone from he school and she had a bunch of her girlfriends with her and saying " you ain't talking shite now what you going to do" and i as thinking woman i would beat the ever living shite out of you, lol if I had any idea who you were


SAS is talking about the understood notion that a "real man" won't hit a woman and just how far some women will take that shite. nothing to do with with her stupid arse response. I don't know what the hell she's talking about. that's the type of woman you tell to shut up while in bed you're ruining it lol


What if I threw a vase back at the girl that threw one at me? now her brother / father / whoever is now looking for me and now one of them is going to get in some trouble, as well as myself, over some bullshite that could have been prevented. Chick as white too lol. She was just pissed the f off.
This post was edited on 7/25/14 at 2:47 pm
Posted by Gtothemoney
Da North Shore
Member since Sep 2012
17715 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 2:58 pm to
I think we all can say with a rational, sober mind, sitting in a non threatening setting, that we would never ever hit a woman.
But then put us in a setting where both of y'all have been drinking and arguing, and a woman cracks you, I can see where instinct may have you hit back.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

Does everyone in this thread really believe that Women should have to go out of their way to make sure they don't provoke a man into beating them?


Clearly you've never had the misfortune of knowing the type of woman that will physically assault you or otherwise bait men into a physical confrontation. Lucky you.

If a woman does those things, she's inciting conflict. I think it's reasonable to ask women not to hit men, throw things at them, spit in their face or throw drinks in their face. Avoid doing those things, things that decent human beings don't do, and you're in good shape.
This post was edited on 7/25/14 at 3:07 pm
Posted by jimithing11
Dillon, Texas
Member since Mar 2011
22478 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

here it tis:
“We know you have no business putting your hands on a woman. I don’t know how many times I got to reiterate that. But as a man who was raised by women, see I know what I’m going to do if somebody touches a female member of my family. I know what I’m going to do, I know what my boys are going to do. I know what, I’m going to have to remind myself that I work for the Worldwide Leader, I’m going to have to get law enforcement officials involved because of what I’m going to be tempted to do. But what I’ve tried to employ the female members of my family, some of who you all met and talked to and what have you, is that again, and this what, I’ve done this all my life, let’s make sure we don’t do anything to provoke wrong actions, because if I come, or somebody else come, whether it’s law enforcement officials, your brother or the fellas that you know, if we come after somebody has put their hands on you, it doesn’t negate the fact that they already put their hands on you. So let’s try to make sure that we can do our part in making sure that that doesn’t happen.”


and?

I don't see anything wrong with that.

I've been in situations where females will verbally abuse men because they know they can get away with it since men should never lay their hands on another woman.

It's a double standard. Women can't have the mindset that hey, i'm going to talk as much shite as I want because I know he won't hit me. Not to mention how some toe the line of baiting

I think that's what SAS is trying to say.
This post was edited on 7/25/14 at 3:09 pm
Posted by The Gooch
Houston, TX
Member since Nov 2009
1254 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 3:11 pm to
All SAS is saying....females don't do what Solange did to Jay Z because he may not react like Jay Z, he may react like Ray Rice
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73172 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 3:17 pm to
stephen a smith is absolutely 100% correct with what he said

but frick him anyway cause he sucks
Posted by jg8623
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
13531 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

this is a bunch of dumb rambling, but there's nothing remotely offensive in here.


Agree. He was on Mike and Mike this morning and all he said was that the women always get passes in situations like this no matter what they did. Said a guy should never put his hands on a woman, but at the same time women should be held accountable for provoking whatever took place
Posted by gadknot
Reality
Member since Jul 2005
37306 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

but at the same time women should be held accountable for provoking whatever took place


But why even bring that up unless you are trying to defend Ray Rice here? Otherwise that point is not relevant to the discussion.
Posted by Haughton99
Haughton
Member since Feb 2009
6124 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 3:41 pm to
Maybe I've missed it in the coverage of this but has anyone alleged that Ray Rice's fiancee' was acting in a way to provoke him to knock her out?
Posted by noonan
Nassau Bay, TX
Member since Aug 2005
36905 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Does everyone in this thread really believe that Women should have to go out of their way to make sure they don't provoke a man into beating them?


Why not, I take the necessary measures to stay out of fights too. Why shouldn't women?
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39625 posts
Posted on 7/25/14 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

But why even bring that up unless you are trying to defend Ray Rice here? Otherwise that point is not relevant to the discussion.



Because some people like to talk about related things when discussing a certain subject? Jesus christ, having a conversation with you must be horrible. Sticking to one subject the whole time, how do you ever move on to something else?
This post was edited on 7/25/14 at 3:52 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram