- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Coming to your neighborhood - The Obama-Holder Thought Gestapo
Posted on 6/8/14 at 10:44 pm to VOR
Posted on 6/8/14 at 10:44 pm to VOR
quote:
This is a story about nothing much that is designed to rile the "true believers
The Wall Street Journal agrees. When you can't debate the message.. attack the messenger, right? Same ole empty take from progs..
quote:
The task force the Justice Department is reviving was originally launched in the aftermath of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing. It was scheduled to meet on the morning of Sept. 11, 2001, but given the terror attacks of that day it didn't meet, and the group's work was quickly eclipsed by the response to those attacks and the effort to defeat al Qaeda in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and elsewhere.
Now, Mr. Holder said in a statement, "we also must concern ourselves with the continued danger we face from individuals within our own borders who may be motivated by a variety of other causes, from antigovernment animus to racial prejudice.''
0
Posted on 6/8/14 at 10:57 pm to Matrixman
quote:
Cooper said plenty of presidents dealt with critical speech, particularly in opposition to the Vietnam War and even the Iraq War. He said no president ever responded like this.
Wrong. Lincoln jailed newspaper editors/publishers who were critical of the Union (who were located in Union states, BTW).
This post was edited on 6/8/14 at 10:58 pm
Posted on 6/8/14 at 10:59 pm to Matrixman
World news daily; dr
Posted on 6/8/14 at 11:08 pm to Alahunter
quote:
Americans have more to fear from a Dem President and policies than foreign enemies.
I agree! That is why I'm convinced the obama radicals will NEVER relinquish power either in 2014 or 2016. The massive influx [invasion] of illegals across our southern border is part of the effort by the radicals [notice I didn't say democrat] to insure power remains in radical hands. There is more to this massive movement of illegals than we're being told. IMO we haven't seen anything like we're about to witness. Already many prominent democrat leaders in the Senate are expressing valid alarm about the seemingly reckless actions of this administration. We saw these concerns expressed about this insane Bergdahl - High Profile Taliban swap. IMO Obama and company have suddenly moved sharply to the left, effectively abandoning any pretext of democratic rule. Unless all Americans [or a determined majority] abandon their petty divisiveness and unite against this real threat, we will see the rise of tyranny in America.
What a mess!
Posted on 6/9/14 at 5:28 am to Matrixman
When do the Obama/Holder types consider the "racism" problem done/over/solved? What has to happen exactly?
Posted on 6/9/14 at 5:33 am to Matrixman
quote:
Attorney General Eric Holder says those threats include individuals the government deems anti-government or racially prejudiced.
And what are Holder/Obama's definitions of "anti-government" and "racially prejudiced"?
Posted on 6/9/14 at 7:04 am to EST
This administration is setting unreal precedents as though there will never be another Republican administration. I can't wait until a Republican president uses these same methods only against liberal groups and directly points to Obama as their justification. Sure will be fun to watch Reid and Pelosi stomp and yell about the President using his pen and phone.
This post was edited on 6/9/14 at 7:05 am
Posted on 6/9/14 at 9:28 am to Tigah in the ATL
Posted on 6/9/14 at 9:35 am to EST
quote:
And what are Holder/Obama's definitions of "anti-government" and "racially prejudiced"?
People who use cash
people who talk about States Rights
People who reference the Constitution or Bill of Rights
People who buy canned food
Veterans
People who own guns
People who support Ron/Rand paul
People who farm/have gardens
People who support jury nullification
People who purchase canned goods
People who fly the American or gadsen Flag
etc
etc
etc
Just remember who they say the #1 threat is....
RETURNING VETERANS.
Posted on 6/9/14 at 10:17 am to CptBengal
I'm not sure that I would have said this a year ago - but I'm leaning towards thinking that this group of radicals in the current administration aren't going to willingly relinquish power. Or rather, they will go above and beyond to attempt to ensure that they remain in power beyond 2014 or even 2016. Hell, Roosevelt ran and was elected 4 times. Now, there is a two-term limit in the constitution, but when has this president ever been concerned with the constitution?
Posted on 6/9/14 at 10:23 am to CptBengal
quote:
Just remember who they say the #1 threat is....
Foreboding Omen....indeed! IMO the radicals in this administration are capable of unimagined evil. They are simply waiting for the right moment. In meantime they will continue to push, threaten, attempt to marginalize the opposition, stonewall Congressional investigations, etc.
Repeat a lie often enough.....and eventually people will begin to believe the lie.
This post was edited on 6/9/14 at 10:26 am
Posted on 6/9/14 at 10:46 am to TerryDawg03
quote:
Wrong. Lincoln jailed newspaper editors/publishers who were critical of the Union (who were located in Union states, BTW).
Right...but if I recall Lincoln [and the union] was in the middle of a declared war. If my memory serves me right during a declared war the President can suspend indivdual rights...including Habeas Corpus. I seem to recall barack "The Fraud" obama said the war on terrorism is over. Think maybe that's why he releasing all those Taliban [four star generals] from Gitmo?
So your pal obama says the war on terror is over .....right? It appears somebody forget to tell Al Qaeda and the Taliban.
This post was edited on 6/9/14 at 10:48 am
Posted on 6/9/14 at 10:51 am to Matrixman
quote:
Personally I believe this administration [including this DOJ] is livid because they have NOT been able to achieve their goal - which is to fundamentally transform this country into a socialist-marxist utopia. Therefore they are becoming more reckless and bold in their attempt to impose their will on everyone....and that includes you.
Go see a professional.
Posted on 6/9/14 at 11:00 am to boosiebadazz
Beat me to it. Have yourself an upvote.
Posted on 6/9/14 at 11:04 am to lsuchip30
quote:
I'm not sure that I would have said this a year ago - but I'm leaning towards thinking that this group of radicals in the current administration aren't going to willingly relinquish power. Or rather, they will go above and beyond to attempt to ensure that they remain in power beyond 2014 or even 2016. Hell, Roosevelt ran and was elected 4 times. Now, there is a two-term limit in the constitution, but when has this president ever been concerned with the constitution?
Would never happen. The amendment process is a bitch, and it was designed to be (thank goodness). Also, for something of that magnitude, things would get ugly quickly.
I do, however, think that the Obamas will still reside in Washington beyond 2016 and try like hell to influence policy.
Posted on 6/9/14 at 11:46 am to Circle K Beggar
I'm not saying that they would be successful at it, just that I wouldn't put it past them to try. There would be an unprecedented amount of blowback, though if that was attempted.
Posted on 6/9/14 at 11:51 am to Matrixman
quote:
In his statement announcing the return of the committee, Holder said he remains concerned about the specter of attacks prompted by Islamic extremists,
THEN TELL YOUR FRIGGIN' BOSS TO STOP TURNING THEM LOOSE, DUMBASS.
Posted on 6/9/14 at 12:02 pm to Layabout
quote:
WND and the people who take them seriously scare me a lot more than Holder and Obama.
WND is a good source. Sorry if I frighten you.
Posted on 6/9/14 at 12:34 pm to Zach
quote:
WND is a good source. Sorry if I frighten you.
It's a very dubious source.
But ignoring that, it's hard to really measure what something like this means. On one hand, most of us acknowledge that the threat of domestic terror is real, if not really prevalent, and that there should be some federal guarding against that.
On the other hand, this could certainly be the groundwork for future intrusions against political foes in the name of security. Furthermore, it continues to be disturbing that folks like Holder are so concerned with anti-government and racial violence that may claim 10-15 lives a year, but think the country should largely disregard the far greater toll of lives taken for petty cash or iPods, largely perpetrated by one demographic.
Posted on 6/11/14 at 7:46 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Go see a professional.
What's the matter? Can't argue with the facts....so you do what all liberals do, you ATTACK THE MESSENGER?
Do yourself a favor......go see a Tea Party Member[TPM] immediately. Listen carefully to what the TPM says, and then do exactly what he [or she] suggest and you will be happy and content for the rest of your life.
"Resist we much" - the REVEREND Al Sharpton
This post was edited on 6/11/14 at 7:58 am
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News