- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St George leaders avoid answering questions from their constituents
Posted on 5/7/14 at 8:23 pm to LSURussian
Posted on 5/7/14 at 8:23 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Mickey, you just don't get it.....everyone who lives in St George is a victim. Nothing that goes wrong is their fault. It's always someone else's fault who is out to just screw those good, honest, hard working, non-elite St George victims.
Exactly. They have a huge victim-mentality.
Kind of ironic, huh?
Posted on 5/7/14 at 8:25 pm to magildachunks
quote:
Quick question for you: They can't even get 18000 people to sign a paper
Did they give up? Were they supposed to have it last week? I'll make a $500 donation to the charity of your choice if they can't get 18,000.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 8:27 pm to Sprocket46
quote:
Did they give up? Were they supposed to have it last week? I'll make a $500 donation to the charity of your choice if they can't get 18,000.
Make it payable to EBRPSS.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 8:40 pm to Sprocket46
quote:
Not at all. I'm saying the lines they used were drawn by BR. It's simple, really.
SG did not have to use that line. They chose to so they could get the money. It's simple, really. They gambled and it may now backfire.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 9:14 pm to Mickey Goldmill
The absolute worst case is that the current petition is invalid. Attorneys have already said thats not likely, but even if it happened they simply start over. That would suck, but the people here aren't going to give up regardless.
And I'm glad we are all on the same page about BR drawing the lines.
And I'm glad we are all on the same page about BR drawing the lines.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 9:19 pm to Sprocket46
quote:
The absolute worst case is that the current petition is invalid. Attorneys have already said thats not likely
Link?
Posted on 5/7/14 at 9:21 pm to LSURussian
Right after your 38million link gets posted.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 9:34 pm to Sprocket46
He forgot where he saw it .
Posted on 5/7/14 at 9:37 pm to Mickey Goldmill
As I understand it, the lines for the incorporation effort were created from the St George and Southeast Fire department boundaries. To me that makes sense. To carve out a third district out of the existing two is less desire able than simply consolidating the two districts in the proposed new city.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 9:50 pm to BR Tiger
What exactly were the borders of the ISD as proposed in the legislature the last two years? Was it one or both fire districts, or some mix of the two?
Posted on 5/7/14 at 9:52 pm to Sprocket46
quote:
Not at all. I'm saying the lines they used were drawn by BR. It's simple, really.
I am so sorry we keep ruining your lives, now even from the past. I am sorry we made Norman and gang pick those lines. It wasn't his fault, he was held up at gunpoint and forced to, by an elite magnet school 2nd grader
Posted on 5/7/14 at 9:59 pm to Lloyd Christmas
quote:
I am so sorry we keep ruining your lives, now even from the past. I am sorry we made Norman and gang pick those lines. It wasn't his fault, he was held up at gunpoint and forced to, by an elite magnet school 2nd grader
Y'all keep bringing up the "lines" that st.George drew and how they were dumb for including the mall.
I merely pointed out BR drew the lines with their incorporated area. Not sure why the need to respond like a child throwing a tantrum.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 10:03 pm to LSUFanHouston
The ISD was defined by the interstates and the parish borders
Posted on 5/7/14 at 10:04 pm to Sprocket46
quote:
I merely pointed out BR drew the lines with their incorporated area.
Just because an area is unincorporated, doesn't mean you have to incorporate it all. Its not an all or nothing proposition. If the leadership had any foresight at all, it could have prevented any Baton Rouge counter-attack.
quote:
Not sure why the need to respond like a child throwing a tantrum.
no comment
Posted on 5/7/14 at 10:10 pm to Sprocket46
quote:
Not sure why the need to respond like a child throwing a tantrum.
Kettle...black.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 10:10 pm to Lloyd Christmas
quote:
Just because an area is unincorporated, doesn't mean you have to incorporate it all. Its not an all or nothing proposition. If the leadership had any foresight at all, it could have prevented any Baton Rouge counter-attack.
There is no "ideal" size. They went with all of the unincorporated areas. It is what it is. They could have left off gardere and some other high crime areas, but they didn't do that either.
Posted on 5/7/14 at 10:11 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Kettle...black
Insert 42 laughing smilies here.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News