Started By
Message

re: Zoo slaughters giraffe and feeds it to the lions...

Posted on 2/10/14 at 12:34 am to
Posted by CroakaBait
Gulf Coast of the Land Mass
Member since Nov 2013
3979 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 12:34 am to
Hey, lions gotta eat, too, Jack.
Posted by Kankles
Member since Dec 2012
5923 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 12:37 am to
why not just turn it loose and let the lions slaughter it. charge admission.
Posted by Harry Caray
Denial
Member since Aug 2009
18668 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 12:58 am to
Now I wonder what giraffe meat tastes like. Couldn't be too bad.
Posted by TigerattheU
Member since Aug 2006
3483 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 2:04 am to
I think giraffes have a place in the charismatic megafauna. I read the zoo's FAQ on it through the link. Contraceptives would "apply a poorer animal welfare"...so they went with the shotgun.
Posted by EST
Investigating
Member since Oct 2003
17876 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 4:33 am to
Posted by Alatgr
Mobeezy, Alabizzle
Member since Sep 2005
17660 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 5:41 am to
Sure, this sucks for the giraffe, but I don't see anyone considering what a "frick yeah!" moment this must have been for the lions.
Posted by RBWilliams8
Member since Oct 2009
53419 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 6:37 am to
Did they chop it up in front of the kids? Bc that's what y'all make it seem like. If so, fricked up.

If they just gave him meat in front of them then no big deal.

"Someone wanted to buy it!" Tell them to buy another one that doesn't need to be culled.
Posted by gorillacoco
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2009
5320 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 7:04 am to
quote:

I thought it was pretty shitty considering someone was willing to pay over $600,000 to take the animal in.


quote:

Had the balls not to give the animal to zoos that volunteered to care for it?


Yeah, pretty ballsy there.


Do you guys not have 30 seconds to read the article which explains why he didn't give it to another zoo or individual.
This post was edited on 2/10/14 at 7:07 am
Posted by fouldeliverer
Lannisport
Member since Nov 2008
13538 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 7:20 am to
I just asked my kids this and they said that it would been better if they had let the lions kill it then eat.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
99877 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 7:25 am to
quote:


Sure, this sucks for the giraffe, but I don't see anyone considering what a "frick yeah!" moment this must have been for the lions.


Posted by DropaDeuce
Houston
Member since Jul 2006
1553 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 7:40 am to
Why no outcry for whatever other animals are slaughtered to feed the lions? I'm sure those lions consume tons of meat each year at that zoo, but I guess a few hundred cattle < one pretty giraffe in the goofy animal rights world.

This killing was done to benifit the existing giraffe population AND feed other animals AND educate children.
Posted by elprez00
Hammond, LA
Member since Sep 2011
29497 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Why no outcry for whatever other animals are slaughtered to feed the lions?

Because ignorant people don't want to know how the steak gets on their plate.

quote:

This killing was done to benifit the existing giraffe population AND feed other animals AND educate children.


It states this pretty clearly in the article.
Posted by mylsuhat
Mandeville, LA
Member since Mar 2008
48958 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 8:03 am to
So a zoo, which owns and breeds these animals, decides that it is in their own best interest to slaughter this giraffe and use it to feed other zoo animals rather than spend money to raise and feed a giraffe that would have to live sterile and in no way make the zoo any money. They get blasted for making this decision? Just because its a pretty/cute giraffe? Cows are slaughtered daily for food. They feed snakes live mice and rats but thats all ok because its not a cute giraffe


This being a huge story just shows how people have their priorities all fricked up
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
34322 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 8:07 am to
Huge double standard here. What if we went and killed an Alabama kid so he couldn't inbreed?
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72422 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 8:09 am to
quote:

Posted by jmarto1 Huge double standard here. What if we went and killed an Alabama kid so he couldn't inbreed?
SUPPORT
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
125009 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Huge double standard here. What if we went and killed an Alabama kid so he couldn't inbreed?


Well, genocide is worse than murder...
Posted by wartiger2004
Proud LGB Supporter! JESUS IS LORD,
Member since Aug 2011
17878 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 8:12 am to
Just make sure the kid is a Bama fan first.
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
34322 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 8:12 am to
It makes you think, maybe the Predator really wasn't such a bad guy. Maybe he was just misunderstood.
Posted by Butch Baum
Member since Oct 2007
2864 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 8:21 am to
quote:

quote:
Posted by jmarto1 Huge double standard here. What if we went and killed an Alabama kid so he couldn't inbreed?
SUPPORT


...Shouldn't it be Scruffy Supports?

Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
34322 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 8:25 am to
Good job, now he has to delete his account.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram