Started By
Message

re: was Jefferson Davis guilty of treason?

Posted on 1/3/14 at 2:31 am to
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69491 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 2:31 am to
quote:

what your opinion of Sherman's actions during the war then?
despicable
Posted by CITWTT
baton rouge
Member since Sep 2005
31765 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 7:37 am to
quote:

went with the much more peaceful act of forgiveness.



So reconstruction and the carpet baggers were sharing the north's forgiveness to the south?
Posted by TerryDawg03
The Deep South
Member since Dec 2012
15926 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 7:53 am to
quote:

terrorist acts against america


Which were?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64685 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:03 am to
Could have been much worse as was suggested by many in the North.
And the North did leave the south after the bargin of 1877 to mostly its own means.
Posted by GetCocky11
Calgary, AB
Member since Oct 2012
51516 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:15 am to
quote:

Could have been much worse as was suggested by many in the North.
And the North did leave the south after the bargin of 1877 to mostly its own means.



Yeah but it had gotten pretty violent in the South way before 1877 because of Reconstruction policies. The damage had already been done by that point.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
35167 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:47 am to
quote:

was Jefferson Davis guilty of treason?


Did the States have a CONSTITUTIONAL LEGAL RIGHT to secede?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64685 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:47 am to
It was horrible for the South many years after but we lost and there is a cost in losing wars.
Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:49 am to
quote:

as the racist face of a bunch of slave holders.
not inaccurate, tho racism was I'm sure almost too-severe-to-be-understood-today everywhere at the time. The South just owned it with overt laws.
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
78248 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:49 am to
quote:

was Jefferson Davis guilty of treason?



No clue, but Obama likely is.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
35167 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 8:55 am to
quote:

No clue, but Obama likely is.


All depends on what the meaning of the word 'is'...is. And the word 'treason'. And the Constitution and 'promote the common welfare'.

It is just flat out all in the eye of the individual beholder. Empirical Reality is, re Quantum Physics. I'm sure Saban would like to employ some Quantum principles in addressing his current empirical reality.
Posted by RhodeIslandRed
Adrift Off the Spanish Main
Member since Aug 2009
3175 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 10:58 am to
quote:

Jefferson Davis went to Centenary College

Davis transferred from Transylvania College to West Point, the latter of which he was damn lucky not to have been expelled. He later studied Spanish at Centenary.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36129 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:01 am to
Jefferson Davis was guilty of treason - yes.

But for the record - so was John Adams.


Posted by dwr353
Member since Oct 2007
2130 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:19 am to
He was not a traitor. Neither was Lincoln-he WAS a war criminal.
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36129 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Neither was Lincoln-he WAS a war criminal.



I dunno bout that but Sherman definitely was.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64685 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:50 am to
If you want to use todays standards both sides were filled to the brim with war criminals. And to only a slightly less standard of the time.
Acts against citizens and their property, soldiers and their all to often from the saddle executions and a whole gamut of behavior on both sides were in plentiful supply throughout the war.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68899 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 11:57 am to
quote:

A traitor can be a hero.


As the saying goes,

One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
19575 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 12:58 pm to
There's a lot of post-war revisionist thinking in this thread.

The Union held no moral high ground - not as we understand it today at least. Racism was endemic in the North and abolitionists were considered extremists. The Emancipation Proclamation was a military act, designed to reduce the manpower of the Confederacy. It did not free slaves in the Union. Most in the North considered free labor morally superior to the southern slave economy, but they made a distinction between the morality of free labor - and the worth of Blacks. They were no better than southerners in that regard and northerners worried that freeing the slaves would result in black immigration into the north. Lincoln himself proposed sending black Americans back to Africa.

The war itself was precipitated by Republican electioneering. National parties up to that point were crafted to draw broad support both north and south of the Mason Dixon line. The Republicans were not, they were a strictly sectional party drawing support from the Midwest and New England. Southerners were deeply worried by their election rhetoric and feared that Republicans would freeze them out of power. That was legitimate concern.

Finally, before the Civil War the states were considered fully sovereign entities that were in no way inferior to the federal government. Before the war writers used the expression "These united states." Only after the war did it become "The united states." The difference is important. Instead of coequal members, they became subordinate members of a permanent federal union.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64685 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 1:18 pm to
Agree with most.
But...
quote:

The war itself was precipitated by Republican electioneering


cause (an event or situation, typically one that is bad or undesirable) to happen suddenly, unexpectedly, or prematurely.

There was much more over a much longer period that lead up to the war. The formation and election victories by the new Republican party were only rungs at the end of the ladder.

Any anti-slavery party was going to be sectional in nature. The South was not going to contribute to its own downfall.

quote:

The Emancipation Proclamation was a military act,


Very true but nots its only purpose. Lincoln was very calculating on when to put this forth. He had to wait for better public sentiment and a perceived victory in the field for it to have a chance to be accepted. He knew it would change completly the reasons why the war must be fought and won. Its unpopularity at the time cannot be over looked.
Posted by Broke
AKA Buttercup
Member since Sep 2006
65066 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 2:05 pm to
Were our founding fathers guilty of treason?
Posted by real
Dixieland
Member since Oct 2007
14027 posts
Posted on 1/3/14 at 2:11 pm to
Im sure he was to some, and to others he was a hero. Just like the Boy that resides in the Whitehouse is today.
This post was edited on 1/3/14 at 2:11 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram