Started By
Message
locked post

West Va. Travel Issues with big 12

Posted on 10/27/13 at 6:26 pm
Posted by Mizzou_ATL
Atlanta, Ga
Member since Feb 2013
190 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 6:26 pm
Look across the remaining big five conferences — Big XII, Big Ten, ACC, Pac-12, SEC — and you’ll find that West Virginia is basically the only true fly-over member of a conference. Leagues that have tried to create large collections of schools from all across the nation have been felled by the distances between the schools, not aided by the total number of television markets covered. Ask folks in the old Big East.

The ACC has had Boston College as a distant relative since 2005, but that league has just added Pittsburgh and Syracuse to its roster of teams. Even stretched from Massachusetts to Florida with a Western protrusion into Kentucky (with soon to join Louisville), the league’s states are still side by side by side by side. With Maryland’s departure to the Big Ten, the only gap in the line is the short distance between Virginia and Pennsylvania.

Moving forward, every ACC school will have a rival or two within its area. That goes for all the major conferences. Except for Big XII and its new bride, West Virginia. And as much as the Mountaineers were hoping/praying for Florida State or Clemson to join them, those schools would have just been closer distant relatives. The folks at FSU and Clemson would also now be asking for travel breaks when it comes to visiting places like Kansas State and Texas Tech.

West Virginia was in a dying Big East and was passed over by the ACC and the SEC. The school didn’t want to get caught without a chair when the music stopped so it jumped. There’s nothing wrong with that. But eventually the distance between Morgantown and its neighbors will become an issue that cannot be overcome.

Successful conferences, no matter how large they become, still provide schools with a few driving-distance rivals. The Big XII flying over states to reach so far east? That doesn’t fit the profile. There’s a reason the SEC never seriously considered adding schools that weren’t connected to the existing SEC footprint. And that reason is why the ACC schools that eyeballed the Big XII were wise to stay put.
This post was edited on 10/27/13 at 7:04 pm
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111758 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 6:30 pm to
UTexas Board.
Posted by Neuromancer
Member since Oct 2013
749 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 6:31 pm to
Oliver Luck.
Posted by Bench McElroy
Member since Nov 2009
33979 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 6:31 pm to
Good post on the wrong board. This is the SEC rant not the MSB, brah.
This post was edited on 10/27/13 at 6:32 pm
Posted by Jobu93
Cypress TX
Member since Sep 2011
19266 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 6:35 pm to
With the new college football playoff, there is pressure upon the SEC to "get in line" with the other conferences for a 9 team scheduling format.

I wonder if the Big XII will be likewise and sufficiently pressured to add two teams in order to get to a 12 team league and offer a championship game. Again, if the SEC is to be pressured into going to a 9 team format, all participants should expose their best to a championship game as well.

This remains to be seen.
This post was edited on 10/27/13 at 6:36 pm
Posted by Beer Bryant
In a Hidden Bunker
Member since Jan 2012
8792 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 6:35 pm to
The SEC adds a NC team and a Va. team, move Mizzou the the Western Division, we set.
Posted by Carolina Tide
Atlanta
Member since Jul 2013
5747 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 6:48 pm to
I still think that it was completly stupid of the Big XII to add WVU. I still don't think that Missouri doesn't completly belong in the SEC, but at least y'all actually border SEC states. And like someone said, can have natural rivalries with Arky, UK and maybe even Tennensee. WVU is just out there in no mans land. Them being in the Big XII makes it look like OU and all the other schools are playing an obligatory OOC game every year. They should've waited to join the B1G, or at least the ACC. They would've been a better fit overall cultural wise, especially in the B1G.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26996 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 6:55 pm to
:inb4markrichthaslostcontrolofthebigxii:
Posted by Tiger Live2
Westwego, LA
Member since Mar 2012
9613 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 7:00 pm to
I would like to see VA Tech in the Big 12. It would be a nearby school for WVU, but mostly I would love for that rivalry to come back. It's another rivalry that dates back to the Civil War.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32486 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 7:08 pm to
Travelocity Board
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
41278 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

And that reason is why the ACC schools that eyeballed the Big XII were wise to stay put.


Despite what many on this board said
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134026 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 7:43 pm to
I remember laughing when I heard the big12 added WVU after all the bluster from the powers that be in that conference about the troubles A&M would have traveling for sports in the SEC
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
17865 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 9:05 pm to
I would take Oliver luck for an AD vs 99.9% of the ADs out there wva will be fine
Posted by Backinthe615
Member since Nov 2011
6871 posts
Posted on 10/27/13 at 9:52 pm to
The Bleast became a coach farm. Kelly, Jones, Petrino, Graham, Rod, Edsal. Outside of UL-who were just getting their feet back under them with Strong, WVU was the only program carrying water nationally in football.

Writing was on the wall and they had to move. ACC was the logical destination, but not much about the current system is logical to me. OL jimmied them into the BXII, staving off KY Senators and God knows what else in the process.

In actual miles WV isn't much worse off than before. Travel to Cuse, Uconn & USF was substantial, but I get the gripe from the westward schools-who all lose an hour en route. The move, other than financially never made sense to me.

I'll still take losing to Oklahoma over UConn though.
This post was edited on 10/27/13 at 9:57 pm
Posted by Sevendust912
Member since Jun 2013
11367 posts
Posted on 10/28/13 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

Mizzou_ATL


What should we do? WVU has better football and basketball programs than Missouri but they were picked because they had a bigger population.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram