- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Man of Steel - upon further review...
Posted on 8/22/13 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 8/22/13 at 3:27 pm
I for one LOVED MOS. It was what a Superman movie should be in this day and age. That said, and while I do understand some of the picking of nits (length of final battle with Zod, Lois' incredible ability to be wherever Kal-El was, regardless of distance), I remain baffled at the low rating for this movie on RT. However, this puts the whole thing in perspective and shows why MOS' RT rating is complete bullshite.
Posted on 8/22/13 at 3:31 pm to udtiger
With the exception of Star Wars: Attack of the Clones, all of those films are better than Man of Steel.
Posted on 8/22/13 at 3:31 pm to udtiger
Ya, those are some terrible movies.
But I dug Revenge of the Sith.
But I dug Revenge of the Sith.
Posted on 8/22/13 at 3:34 pm to udtiger
quote:
I remain baffled at the low rating for this movie on RT
Because it just wasn't very good. Entertaining, sure...but very disappointing.
Posted on 8/22/13 at 3:42 pm to udtiger
Action is great, but when there is little to nothing at stake, it becomes meaningless. two seemingly invincible characters throwing each other from building to building for 30 minutes gets old fast.
Posted on 8/22/13 at 3:45 pm to udtiger
Critics don't know anything even though they have probably seen 100x more movies than you and have actual educational experience in critical analysis. But keep fighting the good fight, brother.
Posted on 8/22/13 at 3:53 pm to udtiger
I don't think many people thought it was a bad movie. It just wasn't nearly as satisfying as the Superman fanboys hoped it would be.
Posted on 8/22/13 at 3:57 pm to udtiger
This is one movie where the critics knew that Man of Steel was going to be quite different from the Donner universe but still couldn't quite handle the departure from the Donner films into something so completely different that MoS was. The critics were expecting something at least similar to the Donner films and Snyder/Nolan never intended to give them that. Hence the low rating.
Part of the reason why Man of Steel was like this is they listened to the fanboys who drive the comic book genre who supremely hated Superman Returns and acted accordingly by realizing that a different, new and fresh take on Supes was in order. Without fanboys, the comic book genre wouldn't exist or just be barely on life support.
Part of the reason why Man of Steel was like this is they listened to the fanboys who drive the comic book genre who supremely hated Superman Returns and acted accordingly by realizing that a different, new and fresh take on Supes was in order. Without fanboys, the comic book genre wouldn't exist or just be barely on life support.
This post was edited on 8/22/13 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 8/22/13 at 4:00 pm to udtiger
I went in prepared to be unimpressed due to the reviews, but I really liked the film a lot
fantastic score and great acting. Pretty much every scene with Kevin Costner is a tear jerker
fantastic score and great acting. Pretty much every scene with Kevin Costner is a tear jerker
Posted on 8/22/13 at 4:11 pm to udtiger
I dug MOS. I definitely preferred it to all the movies listed in the article.
At least critics liked it better than Ghostbusters 2
At least critics liked it better than Ghostbusters 2
Posted on 8/22/13 at 4:27 pm to udtiger
quote:
this puts the whole thing in perspective and shows why MOS' RT rating is complete bullshite.
Ah numerical ratings, while they COULD be useful they are generally full of crap because people have no idea why they are rating something, or what it should mean.
MoS is probably rated about right, it's a good movie, not great. Slightly above average.
The problem is that most of these films have inflated ratings due to terrible ideas of what a rating should mean.
If 50% was an actually Average film, MoS is about right, most of the films on that list should be around 50%. Therefore, it's not about MoS being underrated, most criticisms were on point for a change, but other ratings being far too high.
Edit: That version of Hulk should be significantly higher. Ang Lee's vision, although slightly flawed, was unique. Revenge of the Sith is about right.
This post was edited on 8/22/13 at 4:29 pm
Posted on 8/22/13 at 5:35 pm to udtiger
it was a good movie but not what I expected. I wanted superman addressing real life problems like poverty, war, natural disasters.
Posted on 8/22/13 at 6:35 pm to udtiger
I never expected them to frick up Superman as much as they did. Just baffling.
Posted on 8/22/13 at 6:35 pm to udtiger
I give Man of Steel a score of 3 out of 5 stars. It was a pretty good film but has plenty of things wrong with it.
This post was edited on 8/22/13 at 6:36 pm
Posted on 8/22/13 at 6:42 pm to udtiger
I liked it. I saw it after it had been out a month and was not expecting TDK, but an entertaining flic and it delivered entertainment for me.
Posted on 8/22/13 at 7:04 pm to udtiger
If superman had stopped the oil tanker that was thrown at him by Zod instead of jumping over over it nonchalantly and letting it explode into the parking garage behind him, killing at least 15 people, this movie probably would have had a solid 65% on RT
This post was edited on 8/22/13 at 7:09 pm
Posted on 8/22/13 at 9:08 pm to udtiger
I haven't seen this movie yet. Something always comes up, I'm really looking forward to sitting down alone and checking it out this coming week.
Just hope it does jusitce to Superman.
Just hope it does jusitce to Superman.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 8:50 am to udtiger
quote:
I for one LOVED MOS
Flaws aside, so did I.
Posted on 8/23/13 at 6:17 pm to udtiger
I saw Man of Steel once. I'm glad I saw it, and it was a decent movie.
But. . . 2 things: 1. I don't really have an interest in seeing it again (versus, say, Batman Begins, which I immediately wanted to watch again and again), and 2. I have no interest in seeing a sequel to it. It wasn't a good enough movie to make me invest in a trilogy.
ETA: Actually, with as many superhero movies as are being made today, I should say infinity-ogy. There is no end to them.
But. . . 2 things: 1. I don't really have an interest in seeing it again (versus, say, Batman Begins, which I immediately wanted to watch again and again), and 2. I have no interest in seeing a sequel to it. It wasn't a good enough movie to make me invest in a trilogy.
ETA: Actually, with as many superhero movies as are being made today, I should say infinity-ogy. There is no end to them.
This post was edited on 8/23/13 at 6:19 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News