- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NFL set to look more like CFL?
Posted on 2/11/13 at 8:59 am to Tiger Ryno
Posted on 2/11/13 at 8:59 am to Tiger Ryno
Don't they have an extra man to cover that extra 35 yards?
Posted on 2/11/13 at 9:05 am to tduecen
Extra space would allow guys to run faster & hit harder.. No?
CFL players <<<<<<<<<<<< NFL players
CFL players <<<<<<<<<<<< NFL players
Posted on 2/11/13 at 9:21 am to Harry Caray
quote:
I watched rugby for the first time today and was blown away at how they'd tackle. It was so beautiful.
Yeah, it's a lot easier to square up and break down and make a form tackle in Rugby w/o getting juked and looking like a fool. It's still a relative CC sport - like tackling Alabama's 60's title teams.
Try that style of shoulder high and slowing down to square up with Adrian Peterson or Barry Sanders back in the day. See ya.
This post was edited on 2/11/13 at 9:22 am
Posted on 2/11/13 at 9:24 am to Harry Caray
quote:
I watched rugby for the first time today and was blown away at how they'd tackle. It was so beautiful.
Rugby fields are wider too.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 9:28 am to Zamoro10
Actually trying to square up with someone will help you not get juked.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 9:30 am to quail man
quote:
i'm not sure about how rugby minutes work, but i think the clock keeps running, yeah?
a quarter in football could last 45 minutes...you can't have players just sitting out 45 minutes in the middle of a game. that's just asking for injuries when they come back in
The solution is to avoid committing the sort of penalty that would lead to getting binned, which in turn makes the game safer.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 9:39 am to Sophandros
They need to go back to leather helmets. Nobody will be launching themselves without all that extra padding in their helmets.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 9:57 am to Sophandros
Having played rugby and seeing the way this precise rule keeps people wearing no pads safe, I have long said a "you must attempt to wrap up" rule is the best solution.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 9:57 am to OhFace55
Goodell is ruining the game in a remarkable pace.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:09 am to tduecen
quote:
According to the report, the NFL competition committee considered widening the field at meetings last year and speculation is they will toss around the possibility again. CFL fields are 195 feet wide, while NFL fields are 160 feet wide, a difference of 35 feet.
I would be ok with a compromise
Maybe just make it 10 feet wider instead of the full 35 feet
Would make things more difficult on defenses though
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:21 am to Bacchus
quote:
I don't have any faith that the owners would support this. 35 feet of additional field would mean less space for some premium seats close to the field, right? Would the owners vote to modify the game in such a way that directly impacts their bottom line?
The cost of modifying existing stadiums alone would probably kill that idea.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:26 am to St Augustine
quote:
Ohand make tthem sign a waiver before playing... No need to make this shite into a 60-55 game every week by completely altering the game.
Have fun with that in Louisiana.
They aren't worth the paper they are printed on.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 10:41 am to TXGunslinger10
I think they should look at adding more players to the active roster if they want to widen the field.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 11:01 am to TigerStripes06
quote:
Interesting to hear the back and forth with player safety. Almost everyone agrees that changes can and should be made to further the safety of the players, but every single time someone makes a proposal, OMFG, THEY'RE GOING TO RUIN THE GAME, RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE...etc.
You want safety or you don't.. If people want it, you can't bitch every time a possible solution is so much as discussed.
It's safe enough as is, it's called risk/reward. People are still signing up to make millions of dollars for our amusement KNOWING THE RISKS, so it's safe enough.
Why aren't more people concerned for the safety of MMA fighters? Oh wait, some sports are inherently violent and people know that.
Posted on 2/11/13 at 11:43 am to Captain Ron
Dont they get a free run at the line of scrimmage too? Im sure there are other rules that come along with a wider field. Imagine hines ward with a wider field to begin his speed build up for an illegal crack back block. ![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbanghead.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconbanghead.gif)
Posted on 2/11/13 at 11:44 am to Wally Sparks
quote:
The cost of modifying existing stadiums alone would probably kill that idea.
When Teddy Roosevelt got involved in regulating the sport to make it safer there was talk of widening the field to open the game up but Harvard had just built their (then) massive concrete stadium and they successfully lobbied to nix that idea.
quote:
In those days, football was a running and kicking game. But as the sport became increasingly violent, some colleges were dropping it in favor of rugby, so in 1906 U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt 1880 stepped in to save the game. He organized the Intercollegiate Football Conference — a collection of 28 colleges and universities and the forerunner of the NCAA — and demanded it adopt rules changes to make the sport safer. Some suggested widening the field, but the permanent nature of the stands at Harvard Stadium made it impractical for the school to endorse this plan.
Concerned that eliminating football at Harvard might mean the end of the sport on a national level, the committee instead approved the forward pass, though it did its best to minimize its effect on the sport. In 1906, the penalty for an incomplete was for the offensive team to lose possession (the rule was “softened” in 1907 to a loss of 15 yards). Other rules changes were also implemented, including giving the offense just three downs instead of five to gain a first down and shortening games from 70 to 60 minutes with a mandatory 10-minute rest between halves. In hindsight, however, it was the adoption of the forward pass that curtailed the sport’s violence and led to the surge in popularity that remains to this day.
LINK
This post was edited on 2/11/13 at 11:47 am
Posted on 2/11/13 at 11:58 am to Dr RC
In 1906, the penalty for an incomplete was for the offensive team to lose possession (the rule was “softened” in 1907 to a loss of 15 yards
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 2/11/13 at 11:59 am to Dr RC
CFL has an extra player on the field to compensate for the extra space. Also the CFL recruits vastly different athletes than the NFL. Usually a lot smaller and quicker. Also less skilled as they aren't in the NFL
I'm a fan of the CFL, even if it is a less talented league. Just something fun to do in the middle of summer in Canada.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
I'm a fan of the CFL, even if it is a less talented league. Just something fun to do in the middle of summer in Canada.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)