- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
"Offense is the problem"
Posted on 1/13/13 at 11:46 am
Posted on 1/13/13 at 11:46 am
Seems to be the consensus of the "Callers for change" Excuse me, but didnt we blow leads via inept defense in the waining seconds of both signature losses?
24
Posted on 1/13/13 at 11:50 am to cenla tigah
Couldn't scoring more make it where the defense doesn't have to be perfect at the end of every game? Dumbass
Posted on 1/13/13 at 11:51 am to cenla tigah
Sweet God, this is so stupid!!! The Bama game is what it is, they stepped up and made one more play.
The other 2 games were a direct correlation to our offense going 3 and out consitently and hanging our defense out to dry!! It almost happened in the Auburn and Arky games as well...if you can't see that then you're just completely inept as a fan!!
The other 2 games were a direct correlation to our offense going 3 and out consitently and hanging our defense out to dry!! It almost happened in the Auburn and Arky games as well...if you can't see that then you're just completely inept as a fan!!
Posted on 1/13/13 at 11:52 am to cenla tigah
Take a look at LSU's total offense rank vs total defense rank.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 11:53 am to cenla tigah
quote:
Seems to be the consensus of the "Callers for change" Excuse me, but didnt we blow leads via inept defense in the waining seconds of both signature losses?
Two go hand in hand. Offense failed at the end of both games just as the defense.
In losses to UF and CLemson, LSU had 419 yards of total offense combined.
Against UF 1-13 on third down and a total of 8 first downs
Against Clemson 3-13 and 9
VS Bama, the offense was an anomaly. Best offense of the year but failed to put pts on the board that could have iced the game. Bama game was a totally different offensive effort.
This post was edited on 1/13/13 at 11:56 am
Posted on 1/13/13 at 11:54 am to cenla tigah
Maybe if we scored more than 17 and 24 points we wouldnt have to worry when the defense makes one mistake or two.
The Alabama game was disheartening, whatever, but scoring 24 on Clemson was embarrassing. They held us to what, 8 or 9 three and outs? That's pathetic. And you want to blame defense?
The Alabama game was disheartening, whatever, but scoring 24 on Clemson was embarrassing. They held us to what, 8 or 9 three and outs? That's pathetic. And you want to blame defense?
Posted on 1/13/13 at 11:56 am to cenla tigah
Bama was a great game. Offense played great and the defense did also. Losing that game isn't shameful.
Clemson- you really going to blame the defense for losing the lead after the offense had 7-8 3 and outs and d played over 100 plays?
UF- offense lost that game
Clemson- you really going to blame the defense for losing the lead after the offense had 7-8 3 and outs and d played over 100 plays?
UF- offense lost that game
Posted on 1/13/13 at 12:05 pm to cenla tigah
UF and Clemson games the defense was on the field for 100 plays or more...
Both games could have been won with an average offensive output...
Bama game was 6 yds from running the clock out and taking a knee...
Both games could have been won with an average offensive output...
Bama game was 6 yds from running the clock out and taking a knee...
Posted on 1/13/13 at 12:30 pm to cenla tigah
we can get all the best players but until we get changes at coaching all is futial
Posted on 1/13/13 at 12:39 pm to cenla tigah
quote:
Seems to be the consensus of the "Callers for change" Excuse me, but didnt we blow leads via inept defense in the waining seconds of both signature losses?
Hey, genius ... do you think that maybe if the defense wasn't gassed and tired as hell from being out on the field too damn much due to 3 & OUT's all day long from the offense ... they might play better at the end of games?
Our D was friggin' tired at the end of the UF game and the Clemson game.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 12:45 pm to cenla tigah
The 3 and outs from the offense didn't help the stamina at the end of those games for our defense.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 12:49 pm to cenla tigah
quote:
cenla tigah
Please forgive me ... but I must ask ... do you even watch the games ... or perhaps just the final 5 minutes or just the highlights?
Posted on 1/13/13 at 1:29 pm to cenla tigah
scoring more and not putting our defense in a vice every play would be wise don't you think.
If you want true balance in football then you should have balance of OFFENSE aka scoring points, special teams, defense.
The past year it's been 10% offense 60% defense
30% special teams.
If you want true balance in football then you should have balance of OFFENSE aka scoring points, special teams, defense.
The past year it's been 10% offense 60% defense
30% special teams.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 2:10 pm to cenla tigah
It really comes down to this:
The defense could get better and should certainly try to be a more dominant unit, but it is undeniable - utilizing any reasonable objective or subjective form of evaluation - that the defense was good this year, more or less as it has been for a number of years.. The offense, on the other hand, has been downright bad.
The defense could get better and should certainly try to be a more dominant unit, but it is undeniable - utilizing any reasonable objective or subjective form of evaluation - that the defense was good this year, more or less as it has been for a number of years.. The offense, on the other hand, has been downright bad.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 2:26 pm to cenla tigah
We had less than a 100 yards of offense in the biggest game in LSU history.
We had 200 yards of offense and 8 three and outs against a below average Clemson defense.
Do you really think the O is good to go
We had 200 yards of offense and 8 three and outs against a below average Clemson defense.
Do you really think the O is good to go
Posted on 1/13/13 at 2:36 pm to cenla tigah
Because the offense couldn't stay on the field and wore our d out. See the top on the Clemson and UF games. It was the opposite for the Bama game. Poor play calling lost us that one.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 3:26 pm to cenla tigah
Today's ATL - SEATTLE game is a prime example.
Team comes back and finds a way to get the lead---THAT IS WHAT THE OFFENSE DOES.....THE DEFENSE PROTECTS THE LEAD BY DENYING THE OPPOSING OFFENSE.
The "if we did this than the game would have unfolded a certain way" is moronic crap. People who think this way are those guys turning their beer bottle labels in the BL commercial.
Team comes back and finds a way to get the lead---THAT IS WHAT THE OFFENSE DOES.....THE DEFENSE PROTECTS THE LEAD BY DENYING THE OPPOSING OFFENSE.
The "if we did this than the game would have unfolded a certain way" is moronic crap. People who think this way are those guys turning their beer bottle labels in the BL commercial.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 5:55 pm to cenla tigah
Couldnt the offense win the game for the defense for once? I would bet the chief would like that for once.
Posted on 1/13/13 at 6:10 pm to cenla tigah
It doesn't help when you're on the field so much
Posted on 1/13/13 at 6:26 pm to cenla tigah
quote:
cenla tigah
quote:
Dumbass
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News