- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: This Will Happen: Mack WILL Retire at the End of This Season
Posted on 11/9/12 at 12:35 pm to TreyAnastasio
Posted on 11/9/12 at 12:35 pm to TreyAnastasio
quote:
No one said Arkansas was. Just that about Arkansas and TAM are on the same level.
That's what the piggies want to believe, but they are delluding themselves. A&M job > Arkansas. They have better resources and a much better talent base.
Posted on 11/9/12 at 12:44 pm to TreyAnastasio
Clay Travis ranked the top 25 college jobs. I'd have Ohio State higher, but overall a pretty solid list.
LINK
In what sense? All time accomplishment?
A&M has a much better recruiting base and generates way more revenue. That's not even arguable. When they redo Kyle Field it will seat on 100K. Arkansas will never be at that level. Will A&M become an elite program? Maybe, maybe not. But unlike Arkansas, they could, that's why it's a much better job. Point out where I'm wrong without bringing up the past on field results. I'm talking about potnetial. 12 years ago everyone said LSU would never be an elite program.
LINK
quote:
Arkansas = ATM
In what sense? All time accomplishment?
A&M has a much better recruiting base and generates way more revenue. That's not even arguable. When they redo Kyle Field it will seat on 100K. Arkansas will never be at that level. Will A&M become an elite program? Maybe, maybe not. But unlike Arkansas, they could, that's why it's a much better job. Point out where I'm wrong without bringing up the past on field results. I'm talking about potnetial. 12 years ago everyone said LSU would never be an elite program.
Posted on 11/9/12 at 1:06 pm to H-Town Tiger
quote:
12 years ago everyone said LSU would never be an elite program.
quote:
Will A&M become an elite program? Maybe, maybe not. But unlike Arkansas, they could, that's why it's a much better job.
lulz
quote:
In what sense? All time accomplishment?
I'm not going into to it (records and all) - you're free to think whatever you want - but I will leave this here: Female Cheerleaders
Carry on...
Posted on 11/9/12 at 1:48 pm to DocHog
First of all, Texas won't hire Sumlin. That would require them to admit A&M did something right.
Secondly, there is no way Sumlin will go to OU. The next few years Sumlin is basically going to destroy OU's program in the short term by stealing all their talent (that was really A&M's talent to begin with because they are all Texans).
No way Sumlin wants to knock them down then have to build them back up.
Secondly, there is no way Sumlin will go to OU. The next few years Sumlin is basically going to destroy OU's program in the short term by stealing all their talent (that was really A&M's talent to begin with because they are all Texans).
No way Sumlin wants to knock them down then have to build them back up.
Posted on 11/9/12 at 3:06 pm to cardboardboxer
It's interesting that with all of the talent and money that the state of Texas has, their teams haven't won more championships.
Who else besides Mack Brown and Darrell Royal have been great coaches at Texas? And why hasn't A&M been able to capitalize on that?
Who else besides Mack Brown and Darrell Royal have been great coaches at Texas? And why hasn't A&M been able to capitalize on that?
Posted on 11/9/12 at 3:36 pm to Bellabama
quote:
It's interesting that with all of the talent and money that the state of Texas has, their teams haven't won more championships.
Unlike a state such as Alabama, Texas has many pro teams to consume the passion and the attention of people. College football is number 2 here.
quote:
And why hasn't A&M been able to capitalize on that?
We weren't really in our modern form (as in size and student makeup) until the 1980s. Through the 80s and the 90s we did capitalize to a certain extent, then Fran ruined our program for the most recent decade.
Posted on 11/9/12 at 5:10 pm to Bellabama
Part of the issue is historically you had so many decent schools in the SWC. In the early days Rice and TCU had some powerhouse teams because private schools actually had better resources than public schools. SMU had a few eras where they were excellent. UH actually had some really stout teams as well and Baylor was a consistent Top 25 team back when Grant Teaff was coach. Mainly though a lot of the talent was dispersed amongst those schools and that meant you had 8 schools plus Arkie, the OK schools, and LSU going after that Texas talent. Sure Texas had the most years on top of the pile but they didn't dominate nearly as much as they act like they did outside of the 60's when the scholarship rules really made the field unbalanced.
Oh and to whomever asked lots of schools would have loved Jackie Sherrill before the NCAA came after him and RC Slocum turned down the Arizona Cardinals job to stay at A&M. Mike Sherman actually turned down the Cleveland Browns job as well.
Oh and to whomever asked lots of schools would have loved Jackie Sherrill before the NCAA came after him and RC Slocum turned down the Arizona Cardinals job to stay at A&M. Mike Sherman actually turned down the Cleveland Browns job as well.
Posted on 11/9/12 at 9:56 pm to Roughneck
I wouldn't be surprised if Texas made a huge offer to Saban.
Posted on 11/10/12 at 8:17 am to Roughneck
Texas job
Saban---ain't gonna happen
Gruden---lol
Sumlin---nope
Boise coach--i'd be very leery of that
Patterson---if he's in play, they better hurry up.
A Harbaugh---I guess that's possible, but I doubt it.
That's it, there are no more sexy choices for Texas.
Saban---ain't gonna happen
Gruden---lol
Sumlin---nope
Boise coach--i'd be very leery of that
Patterson---if he's in play, they better hurry up.
A Harbaugh---I guess that's possible, but I doubt it.
That's it, there are no more sexy choices for Texas.
Posted on 11/10/12 at 9:36 am to Skillet
When the job opens up, Chris Petersen gets the 1st call. Whether he'll take it or not is the question.
As for Patterson, I'm hearing more & more that he's headed to the Ozarks.
As for Patterson, I'm hearing more & more that he's headed to the Ozarks.
Posted on 11/10/12 at 10:51 am to TreyAnastasio
quote:aTm >>>> arky as a HC football job. recruiting is a big trump card
Just that about Arkansas and TAM are on the same level.
Posted on 11/10/12 at 10:51 am to TreyAnastasio
double post :mybad:
This post was edited on 11/10/12 at 10:52 am
Posted on 11/10/12 at 11:36 am to Roughneck
He'll retire in 5 years.
Posted on 11/10/12 at 12:30 pm to tigerpimpbot
Texas fans have been trying to retire Mack for years. They are acting like the dude is 75 years old. Hes basically the same age as miles and saban. He's a terribly underachieving coach, but I don't buy the 'he's tired' BS. Thats the cushest college job in the world. Easy schedule every year, tons of money, great recruiting base, not as much of a demanding fan base as other top jobs. If that dudes tired and worn out, he's just a pussy.
Posted on 11/10/12 at 1:26 pm to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
quote:
This Will Happen: Mack WILL Retire at the End of This Season
quote:
Just that about Arkansas and TAM are on the same level.
aTm >>>> arky as a HC football job. recruiting is a big trump card
I've heard or read this for the 43 years I've been a Hog fan. I've yet to see this come true.
I know, I know, the SEC street cred is what will finally get them over the hump.
The truth is that TAMU and Arkansas are roughly equal all time programs, with us owning the head-to-head. And MOST importantly, neither of us have the history of the big 6
Posted on 11/10/12 at 1:30 pm to DocHog
quote:
The truth is that TAMU and Arkansas are roughly equal all time programs, with us owning the head-to-head. And MOST importantly, neither of us have the history of the big 6
That's not what we are talking about. Past records are largely irrelevant. A&M has more upside, that's not arguable. Whether they take advantage of it is yet to be seen. But yes, being the SEC gives they a leg up. They no have something different to offer than UT. Notice that when the Big 3 in Florida where dominated none of them were in the same conference.
quote:
Thats the cushest college job in the world. Easy schedule every year, tons of money, great recruiting base, not as much of a demanding fan base as other top jobs. If that dudes tired and worn out, he's just a pussy.
You clearly aren't paying attention. Just look at him this year. He's whining about the LHN. Last week he was whining about meanie's from other teams doing horns down. He just looks like he's worn out. He's probably sticking around for the reason's you mention, but he's been there for almost 15 years, time to move on.
This post was edited on 11/10/12 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 11/10/12 at 1:40 pm to Gatoreng5
quote:
Stay away from Boom and hire saban
Amazing that took until page two.
Posted on 11/10/12 at 1:46 pm to Bellabama
quote:
It's interesting that with all of the talent and money that the state of Texas has, their teams haven't won more championships.
I'm not surprised to see a Bama fan say this given how many questionable titles Alabama claims and that bragging about them is the root of most of your fan base's self worth. UT could claim a lot more.
quote:
Who else besides Mack Brown and Darrell Royal have been great coaches at Texas?
Dana X Bible is one of the legendary coaches of all time. He coached at both Texas and A&M and even a year at LSU.
Your comment also shows the folly of judging coaches solely on titles in a sport where the National Title has not only always been determined by a popularity contest, but has shifted over time.
For example, Fred Akers was a pretty good coach for UT. He led a #1 ranked team in 1977 to the Cotton bowl, where he lost to Notre Dame. Just 4 years earlier, when 1977 Heisman winner Earl Campbell was HS Sr, Bear Bryant had a #1 ranked team lose to Notre Dame in the Sugar Bowl. However, in 1973 the UPI (coaches poll) still did not do a poll after the bowls, so Bryant gets a split title with an undefeated ND team he lost to in a bowl. The UPI was so embarrassed they started awarding the NC after the bowls like the AP unfortunately for Akers. This was Bryant's 2nd title after losing a bowl and the first of 2 he split with a team that beat him. Royal also had a title with a bowl loss.
So besides Royal and Brown, count Bible and Fred Akers.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News