Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Started By
Message
locked post

Question about the bias of SEC refs

Posted on 10/19/10 at 1:49 pm
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 1:49 pm
I'm really confused.

Reading the things that many of you guys post, I should believe that the refs are biased for Auburn.

However, last year after the Alabama game and the PP non-interception, it was that the refs were bias for Alabama.

Or are you guys saying that the SEC refs are biased for both Auburn and Alabama? If so, how the frick does that make any sense? You are saying that refs that want Alabama to win also want Auburn to win???

Please help clear up my confusion. Thanks in advance.
Posted by Mike Honcho
North Dallas
Member since Oct 2007
2929 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 1:52 pm to
1. The SEC offices are in Alabama.
2. The SEC wants the team with the best chance to go to the MNCG to win because it enhances the SEC brand. If we are undefeated on the last week of the season you may even see refs giving us the breaks over Arkansas.
Posted by Pilot Tiger
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2005
73182 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 1:52 pm to
I dont necessarily buy into the ref bias, but I think the SEC has a vested interest in getting 2 teams in the BCS every year, including the national title game
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

The SEC wants the team with the best chance to go to the MNCG to win because it enhances the SEC brand. If we are undefeated on the last week of the season you may even see refs giving us the breaks over Arkansas.


This is plausible.


However, the SEC offices in Alabama argument is stupid.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
102023 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

However, the SEC offices in Alabama argument is stupid.


Not if you think the bias is more subliminal than actual a conscious type thing.



I'm not one who thinks there's really "bias" by the way, submiminal or otherwise.
Posted by liquid rabbit
Boxtard BPB®© emeritus
Member since Mar 2006
61102 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 2:00 pm to
I think it's because of a pattern of obviously horrendous calls vs. Alabama schools. It always seems to favor them. That's what leads to the conclusion that it must be intentional. When in fact it's just really horrible calls that "just by chance" always happen to go the way of the Alabama schools.
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

I think it's because of a pattern of obviously horrendous calls vs. Alabama schools. It always seems to favor them. That's what leads to the conclusion that it must be intentional. When in fact it's just really horrible calls that "just by chance" always happen to go the way of the Alabama schools.


Has anyone ever done a statistical analysis to determine if the Alabama schools truly do get a disproportionate amount of calls??? Or is this "pattern" just something that people spout without anything to truly back up their claim?
This post was edited on 10/19/10 at 2:03 pm
Posted by Choupique19
The cheap seats
Member since Sep 2005
62430 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

Has anyone ever done a statistical analysis to determine if the Alabama schools truly do get a disproportionate amount of calls???


How many offensive holding penalties have been called on Alabama in the last year and a half?
Posted by LaronLandry
Member since Oct 2008
265 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 2:05 pm to
They are biased against everyone playing against LSU.

Posted by Phil2012
The planet
Member since Dec 2005
6213 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 2:06 pm to
Follow the money!
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26452 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 2:08 pm to
The SEC offices are in Birmingham, Alabama.

Most of the conference's referees live in (or are from) the state of Alabama.

You do the math.



I don't think there is "blatant cheating" by the SEC refs, but I do think there is certainly a natural human bias that at times rears its head on questionable calls.
This post was edited on 10/19/10 at 2:10 pm
Posted by JPLSU1981
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
26452 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Has anyone ever done a statistical analysis to determine if the Alabama schools truly do get a disproportionate amount of calls??? Or is this "pattern" just something that people spout without anything to truly back up their claim?



Check out how many offensive holding calls have gone against Alabama the last two years.

No need to look any further. If that's not enough evidence of SEC bias, then I don't know what is.
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Check out how many offensive holding calls have gone against Alabama the last two years.



Can someone point me to the stats that show the offensive holding calls of every team in the SEC?

I will run statistical analyses on the data to see if there really is an issue.

(SEC games only)
Posted by JermStone
Beaumont, Tx
Member since Jun 2008
5741 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

However, the SEC offices in Alabama argument is stupid.


If you use this argument, you have to stipulate that the president of the ncaa is the former chancellor of LSU.

Checks and balances

Eta: nevermind. Two seperate entities.
Sec hates LSU. ...there, I feel better
This post was edited on 10/19/10 at 2:15 pm
Posted by Mike Honcho
North Dallas
Member since Oct 2007
2929 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 2:13 pm to
There is probably a callable holding call on every Mark Ingram run. If they call half of them he doesnt win the Heisman last year. The Heisman is good for the league so they get the calls.
Posted by lashinala
End of 565
Member since Jan 2006
5721 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 2:13 pm to
Most of the reasons already given may have some merit, but to add....the call usually goes to the undefeated team, as it may get the SEC into the NC game.
Posted by WikiTiger
Member since Sep 2007
41055 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

If you use this argument, you have to stipulate that the president of the ncaa is the former chancellor of LSU.

Checks and balances


And the NCAA offices are located in Indianapolis.....so ND, IU and Purdue should dominate all sports!!!!
Posted by Ray Ray Rodman
Florida
Member since Mar 2005
17654 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

Or are you guys saying that the SEC refs are biased for both Auburn and Alabama? If so, how the frick does that make any sense? You are saying that refs that want Alabama to win also want Auburn to win???


Yes. They want both to win until they play each other.

Several SEC Refs have homes and large loans from Colonial Bank and Regions Bank.

Bobby Lowder and Colonial Bank want to make sure Auburn always wins and the same goes for Regions Bank and Alabama. Direct conflict of interest if you ask me...
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
78175 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 2:16 pm to
I doubt anyone provides you with the stats you want. I would, but I'm lazy.

But I'd like to add that I think someone found out one of the booth replay officials for the Bama LSU game last year was a Bama graduate. I'm sure that influenced the Peterson interception.

Auburn LSU 2006 is the only game I've ever felt was fixed, multiple blown calls. Not sure by who or how, but it was fixed.
Posted by JermStone
Beaumont, Tx
Member since Jun 2008
5741 posts
Posted on 10/19/10 at 2:16 pm to
Yea I edited after I realized we were talking sec and ncaa. My bad. Long Tuesday!
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram