Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Energy Sec. says gas prices may not drop below $3 until 2027

Posted on 4/19/26 at 12:56 pm
Posted by bigjoe1
Member since Jan 2024
1801 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 12:56 pm
quote:

Energy Secretary Chris Wright on Sunday said gas prices may not drop below $3 until next year, as the U.S. war with Iran and closure of the Strait of Hormuz continue to wreak havoc on energy markets.

“I don’t know, that could happen later this year, that might not happen until next year, but prices have likely peaked,” Wright said on CNN’s “State of the Union” when asked when prices at the pump will return to pre-war figures. “Certainly with a resolution of this conflict, energy prices will go down.”

Wright added that “under $3 a gallon is pretty tremendous in inflation-adjusted terms. We had that in the Trump administration, but we hadn’t seen that in inflation-adjusted terms for quite a long time. We’ll get back there for sure.”
CNBC
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
52470 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 1:35 pm to
Posted by Shepherd88
Member since Dec 2013
4930 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 3:04 pm to
Glad we dropped all those alternative energy incentives!
Posted by TDFreak
Coast to Coast - L.A. to Chicago
Member since Dec 2009
9234 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 4:16 pm to
Oil refiners should do well for the next couple of quarters.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
84826 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

Energy Sec. says gas prices may not drop below $3 until 2027


Charles Payne said this early last week... This admin fricked up big time with their Iran bullshite.

Posted by Everyday Is Saturday
Member since Dec 2025
1175 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 9:35 pm to
Oil companies make less profit per gallon than U.S. makes on federal taxes on each gallon.

Oil Co - Retail price less cost of goods sold

Less than

Federal taxes per gallon

Energy Sec, over to you.
This post was edited on 4/19/26 at 9:39 pm
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74018 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 9:42 pm to
I’m calling bs on this


Generally when prices stay high for an extended period, it’s due to a decline in productive capacity (for example, beef prices are high because of falling cattle counts happening for years)

In the case of gas prices, the price has increased because oil currently being produced in the Middle East can’t cross a body of water.

Productive capacity hasn’t changed.

Prices would be expected to fall rapidly once the strait opens, since the supply of oil would go back to what it was.

Unless I am missing something and oil production facilities have been destroyed
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
29410 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

Generally when prices stay high for an extended period, it’s due to a decline in productive capacity (for example, beef prices are high because of falling cattle counts happening for years) In the case of gas prices, the price has increased because oil currently being produced in the Middle East can’t cross a body of water. Productive capacity hasn’t changed. Prices would be expected to fall rapidly once the strait opens, since the supply of oil would go back to what it was. Unless I am missing something and oil production facilities have been destroyed


You can’t be further from the truth if you tried.

For openers, when this episode ends you can’t just turn on a spigot, startup of shut in facilities will take months.

Worldwide storage is dwindling at a furious pace. The world currently consumes more than is being produced. Companies have also been deferring capex spending for years, most project cycles are years.

Also the logistical mess when all of this is over.

Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74018 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 10:47 pm to
I guess we will agree to disagree

Do I think oil prices will immediately fall to their prior levels. No.

But the re-opening of the strait would obviously lead to a fall in prices. Substantially.


I just looked at your post history and it’s obvious we will not be able to agree on the Iran thing. I personally am an Iran hawk who believes that we simply cannot let Iran keep their nuclear program/baliistic missile defenses in exchange for cheap gas. If I understand your position correctly, you think it’s more important to get oil prices down Asap even if it means giving Iran some of their present demands. That’s understandable but we won’t be able to agree on this.
Posted by TJG210
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2006
29410 posts
Posted on 4/19/26 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

I just looked at your post history and it’s obvious we will not be able to agree on the Iran thing. I personally am an Iran hawk who believes that we simply cannot let Iran keep their nuclear program/baliistic missile defenses in exchange for cheap gas. If I understand your position correctly, you think it’s more important to get oil prices down Asap even if it means giving Iran some of their present demands. That’s understandable but we won’t be able to agree on this.


I don’t think you’ve read my posts at all lol

I tend to agree that we shouldn’t allow Iran to have nukes. My main interest is to make as much as I can from trading this event. From my research, I don’t believe prices are dropping for the foreseeable future for the reasons outlined.
Do I think Trumps behavior through this has been objectively dumb, I do. He’s constantly tweeted out misinformation for no other reason than to manipulate prices and allow certain folks to front run the information. But I have no interest in debating the merits of the conflict itself.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram