- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Kingdom of Heaven Director’s Cut
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:48 am
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:48 am
Is the Director’s Cut markedly better than the theatrical release? The theatrical release was fine but not a good movie. Seems like so much was left on the cutting room floor. It was disjointed and the hero was almost a Mary Sue. Whereas the Director’s Cut seems to build his story more.
Is that accurate? Been a while since I’ve seen it and I might watch it tonight.
Is that accurate? Been a while since I’ve seen it and I might watch it tonight.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 7:51 am to LoveThatMoney
Yes the theatrical release is dogshit- legitimately a terrible movie- and Ridley's cut is one of the best films ever made.
If anyone ever asks you what editing is, the contrast between the two is a masterclass
If anyone ever asks you what editing is, the contrast between the two is a masterclass
This post was edited on 4/19/26 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 4/19/26 at 8:05 am to LoveThatMoney
Yes and there is multiple threads on this topic as well.
Ridley Scotts Directors cut was great.
They get pretty good in depth about the film and even some of the horstical content behind it.
Ridley Scotts Directors cut was great.
They get pretty good in depth about the film and even some of the horstical content behind it.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 8:13 am to LoveThatMoney
quote:
Is the Director’s Cut markedly better than the theatrical release?
Uh, yeah.
I still remember walking out of that movie in the theater saying like it felt like we were missing an entire movie, only to find out a few months later that was 100% correct.
The movie still has flaws, but the DC adds so much depth both in the introduction and in Jerusalem.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 10:38 am to SlowFlowPro
Yep. Such a great movie. There needs to be more Crusades’ movies. The first 30 minutes of Kingdom of Heaven are up there with the opening of Gladiator in Germania vs the goths. Just peak Ridley cinematography. I would’ve watched a movie just following Liam and his crew around Europe on their way to Jersualem.
I actually did a re watch a few weeks ago and never realized Jamie Lannister is the Sheriff that comes after them in the woods.
Guy de Lusignan is also a very underrated antagonist and the fight between him and Balian should’ve never been cut.
Ridley Scott with the Game of Thrones source material would’ve been incredible. Maybe he can direct a spin off movie when they eventually decide to run GoT spin offs into the ground.
1. Kubrick
2. Nolan
3. Denis
4. Ridley (but at his best is THE best imo)
5. Malick (even though his movies bore me to tears)
6. Wes Anderson
7. Tarantino
I actually did a re watch a few weeks ago and never realized Jamie Lannister is the Sheriff that comes after them in the woods.
Guy de Lusignan is also a very underrated antagonist and the fight between him and Balian should’ve never been cut.
Ridley Scott with the Game of Thrones source material would’ve been incredible. Maybe he can direct a spin off movie when they eventually decide to run GoT spin offs into the ground.
1. Kubrick
2. Nolan
3. Denis
4. Ridley (but at his best is THE best imo)
5. Malick (even though his movies bore me to tears)
6. Wes Anderson
7. Tarantino
This post was edited on 4/19/26 at 10:51 am
Posted on 4/19/26 at 11:27 am to LoveThatMoney
Don`t Flame me.
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/movie-tv/kingdom-of-heaven-starring-orlando-bloom-and-edward-norton/14596328/
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/movie-tv/directors-cut-of-kingdom-of-heaven/31359363/
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/movie-tv/kingdom-of-heaven-directors-cut-in-theaters-1-night-only/118550323/
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/movie-tv/what-makes-kingdom-of-heaven-directors-cut-so-much-superior-to-the-theatrical-release/90114429/page-2/
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/movie-tv/kingdom-of-heaven-starring-orlando-bloom-and-edward-norton/14596328/page-2/
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/movie-tv/kingdom-of-heaven-starring-orlando-bloom-and-edward-norton/14596328/
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/movie-tv/directors-cut-of-kingdom-of-heaven/31359363/
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/movie-tv/kingdom-of-heaven-directors-cut-in-theaters-1-night-only/118550323/
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/movie-tv/what-makes-kingdom-of-heaven-directors-cut-so-much-superior-to-the-theatrical-release/90114429/page-2/
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/movie-tv/kingdom-of-heaven-starring-orlando-bloom-and-edward-norton/14596328/page-2/
Posted on 4/19/26 at 11:42 am to UnluckyTiger
quote:
There needs to be more Crusades’ movies. The first 30 minutes of Kingdom of Heaven are up there with the opening of Gladiator in Germania vs the goths. Just peak Ridley cinematography. I would’ve watched a movie just following Liam and his crew around Europe on their way to Jersualem.
I'd suggest you try out this book: Pilgrim: A Medieval Horror
quote:
A German knight and his companions journey home after seven years in the Holy Land, facing horrors inspired by Arabic, Christian, and pre-Islamic traditions.
I didn't finish it b/c it got a bit repetitive and it's pretty dense. However, I ran through the first half (or so) of the book. It's very historically accurate and even at the exact time of KOH (Baldwin is a child in the book, IIRC). They spend a good bit of time in Jerusalem early on and it goes into excruciating detail about living in the city and what the crusades were like.
Posted on 4/19/26 at 12:29 pm to LoveThatMoney
It’s infinitely better than the original version. Way more immersive and makes the viewer feel like he or she is going on a journey throughout the Middle East with Orlando Bloom’s character.
Ridley Scott in the 2000s was untouchable. Dude should have just called it quits 10 to 15 years ago when his peak was clearly over
Ridley Scott in the 2000s was untouchable. Dude should have just called it quits 10 to 15 years ago when his peak was clearly over
Posted on 4/19/26 at 3:23 pm to Sunnyvale
I’m not going to, but your point was made. Sorry I made you reply again
Posted on 4/20/26 at 7:04 am to JasonDBlaha
quote:
Dude should have just called it quits 10 to 15 years ago when his peak was clearly over
I think he has multiple movies in the queue and he's pushing 90
Posted on 4/20/26 at 8:02 am to UnluckyTiger
Made by someone who actually understands the Crusades -- Ridley does not.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 12:13 pm to LoveThatMoney
There are a few problems with Kingdom of Heaven. One is that it very clearly tries to push the crusades as an act of Christian aggression against the peaceful Muslim native inhabitants of the land.
The protagonist and other characters who are meant to be the good guys are shown to be openly agnostic and cynical while the characters who are deeply Christian are shown to be blood thirsty villains. Think back to the scene of when the Knight of Hospitaller tells Balian "I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of God". It is a good quote but is completely ahistorical. It is adding modern sensibilities into characters who existed in the 12th century.
Meanwhile Saladin is shown to be righteous and Godfearing. His faith isn't treated as dangerous or violent and they don't feel the need to downplay his faith by having him act like a skeptic. He is depicted as wise and tolerant despite the fact that the real Saladin was a jihadist through and through. His ultimate goal was to spread Islam to the entire world by the sword.
There are other examples that show this, but when it boils down to it, it really seems like Ridley Scott is trying to place the blame of all the atrocities of the crusades on the Christians and portray Christianity as the more dangerous of the two religions. This is despite the fact that by the time of the First Crusade, Islam had conquered and forcibly converted nearly 2/3rds of the Christian world.
The protagonist and other characters who are meant to be the good guys are shown to be openly agnostic and cynical while the characters who are deeply Christian are shown to be blood thirsty villains. Think back to the scene of when the Knight of Hospitaller tells Balian "I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of God". It is a good quote but is completely ahistorical. It is adding modern sensibilities into characters who existed in the 12th century.
Meanwhile Saladin is shown to be righteous and Godfearing. His faith isn't treated as dangerous or violent and they don't feel the need to downplay his faith by having him act like a skeptic. He is depicted as wise and tolerant despite the fact that the real Saladin was a jihadist through and through. His ultimate goal was to spread Islam to the entire world by the sword.
There are other examples that show this, but when it boils down to it, it really seems like Ridley Scott is trying to place the blame of all the atrocities of the crusades on the Christians and portray Christianity as the more dangerous of the two religions. This is despite the fact that by the time of the First Crusade, Islam had conquered and forcibly converted nearly 2/3rds of the Christian world.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 1:20 pm to ManBearTiger
quote:
Yes the theatrical release is dogshit- legitimately a terrible movie- and Ridley's cut is one of the best films ever made.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 1:22 pm to blueboy
It's not one of the best movies ever made but it's a vastly superior movie and experience.
It's in the very good with flaws, range.
The theatrical is just a slog
It's in the very good with flaws, range.
The theatrical is just a slog
Posted on 4/20/26 at 1:26 pm to blueboy
The director’s cut is 100% worth a watch
Posted on 4/20/26 at 1:27 pm to LoveThatMoney
One movie I think could have deserved a prequel. Liam Neeson and Jeremy Irons characters
.
.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 1:48 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Well, here it is for free on YT if anyone wants to watch it.
Posted on 4/20/26 at 4:54 pm to QC Reb
quote:
Meanwhile Saladin is shown to be righteous and Godfearing. His faith isn't treated as dangerous or violent and they don't feel the need to downplay his faith by having him act like a skeptic. He is depicted as wise and tolerant despite the fact that the real Saladin was a jihadist through and through. His ultimate goal was to spread Islam to the entire world by the sword.
Yeah this is my main gripe with the movie as well. In that vein, Kingdom of Heaven was about 15 years ahead of schedule with white Christian male bad, everyone else good
Posted on 4/20/26 at 5:01 pm to LoveThatMoney
Is the director's cut available anywhere for streaming, or do you have to buy it?
Posted on 4/20/26 at 5:49 pm to jchamil
It's available every once in awhile on Prime, but typically you have to buy it. Ago at a used Blu-Ray store for like $5
Popular
Back to top

8









