Judge Boasberg gets slapped down by District court of appeals.

quote:

---

AI Summary:

Summary: Court Vacates Judge Boasberg’s Contempt Investigation
On April 14, 2026, a federal appeals court issued a second writ of mandamus to halt a criminal contempt investigation led by District Judge James Boasberg against senior Executive Branch officials. The appellate court ruled that the investigation was a "clear abuse of discretion" and an "unwarranted impairment" of the Executive Branch's constitutional duties.

Core Conflict: Deportations and the TRO
The case stems from a March 14, 2025, proclamation by the President invoking the Alien Enemies Act against the foreign terrorist organization Tren de Aragua. Judge Boasberg issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to halt certain actions; however, the government subsequently transferred suspected members to Salvadoran custody.

Judge Boasberg launched a criminal contempt probe into whether the government "willfully violated" his order, specifically seeking to investigate high-level deliberations and potentially prosecute Secretary Noem.

Key Rulings by the Appeals Court
The appellate panel intervened for several critical reasons:

Lack of Clarity: The court found that the original TRO "said nothing about transferring custody". Under the legal principle that criminal liability cannot turn on "unstated intentions," the order lacked the clarity required to support a criminal contempt charge.

Separation of Powers: The court argued that the investigation encroached on the autonomy of the Executive Branch by probing sensitive deliberations regarding national security and diplomacy.

Improper Use of Opposing Counsel: The court criticized the involvement of plaintiffs’ counsel in the contempt investigation, noting it allowed private interests to improperly influence public duties.

Inadequacy of Appeals: Mandamus was deemed necessary because waiting for a final conviction to appeal would not undo the constitutional harm caused by the "intrusive" and "freewheeling" judicial inquiry.

Criticism of Media and Judicial Conduct
The opinion includes a sharp concurrence that took aim at "predictably inaccurate" media coverage from outlets like ABC and the New York Times. The concurring judge clarified that the district court never actually ordered the government to "turn the planes around," despite widespread media reports to the contrary.

The court concluded that Judge Boasberg’s continued pursuit of the investigation—despite a previous mandamus—represented a "judicial usurpation of power" that had to be halted to protect the independence of the Judiciary and the Executive alike.

---

Sorry SFP

Lol. Suck it!

In before one of our residents wanna be lawyers claims; "this isn't the win you think it is".

quote:

---

SlowFlowPro posted on 4/17/25 to NC_Tigah

quote:

---

That ended when idiot Boasberg intentionally challenged the country's entire Constitutional foundation.

---

Update: this never happened.

---

It happened, then it happened again.
Same "Judge". Same premise.
Rinse and repeat.

quote:

---

an absolute moron

---

Nah.
But at times his contrarianism gets in the way of appropriate analysis.

quote:

---

Nah.
But at times his contrarianism gets in the way of appropriate analysis.

---

Dude thinks he is an expert about everything. I've yet to see the first thing.

Love to see it.

I’m not sure it ultimately prevents Boasberg from “Boasberging” again in the future because he’s obviously primarily motivated in using his role help advance a political agenda.

But to see him get publicly slapped down and called out is still good to see (and well deserved).

quote:

---

Sorry SFP

---

He's punching the air right now... Seething.

quote:

---

quote:
But at times his contrarianism gets in the way of appropriate analysis.


At times?

---

quote:

---

at times his contrarianism gets in the way of appropriate analysis.

---

At times??? Come on NC you know better than that. He absolutely destroys 99% of the threads he joins to where you inevitably end up arguing semantics and totally different subjects. There’s a very valid reason he’s disliked by most on this board.