Started By
Message

Documentary claims to debunk Bigfoot film

Posted on 3/31/26 at 11:32 am
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
7137 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 11:32 am
A new documentary called Capturing Bigfoot claims to have unearthed evidence thad debunks the famous Paterson Gimlin film shot at Bluff Creek, CA in 1967.

The debunking claim largely rests on recently unearthed footage that the filmmakers assert was shot in 1966, and was a rehearsal for what they claim to be a hoax. Supporters of the Patterson Gimlin film's authenticity claim the new footage was a re-enactment of the actual encounter.

There is no chain of custody for the new film, so nobody knows when it was actually shot.




LINK
Posted by AlterDWI
Pattern Noticing, Alabama
Member since Nov 2012
6091 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 11:36 am to
The first clue was that it looks exactly like a man dressed in a gorilla costume.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
178071 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 11:38 am to
we know one thing for sure, that's not will campbell.
Posted by Christopher Columbo
Member since Jun 2015
3035 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 11:39 am to
Posted by BeachTiger2018
Pinellas County FL
Member since Aug 2022
1360 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 11:41 am to
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
17552 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 11:43 am to
That’s exactly what they want you think.
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
16883 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 11:44 am to
That footage is proof positive that Bigfoot exists. Also there’s hundreds of other videos.
Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
10070 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 11:46 am to
Pffft. Steve Austin proved Bigfoot was fake 50 years ago.

Posted by BobABooey
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2004
16078 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:15 pm to
Funny how Bigfoot deniers criticize any film or photo evidence but some “found footage” from 50 years ago (supposedly) comes along and they’re all-in.
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
12347 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:22 pm to
As long as no one tries to cross human DNA with a Nutria to make full size nutria coats from a single animal, we should be safe in SE Louisiana.

Posted by AlterDWI
Pattern Noticing, Alabama
Member since Nov 2012
6091 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

Funny how Bigfoot deniers criticize any film or photo evidence but some “found footage” from 50 years ago (supposedly) comes along and they’re all-in.


That video was debunked at least 20 years ago.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
91129 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

That video was debunked at least 20 years ago.


Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
22202 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:36 pm to
People still argue about this while the mongoloids who made the fricking thing admitted it’s just one of them in a suit.
Posted by BitBuster
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2017
1742 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

People still argue about this while the mongoloids who made the fricking thing admitted it’s just one of them in a suit.


Like the guy who made up the Nessie story, or the guys who were making all the crop circles by stepping on broomsticks.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
121709 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:41 pm to
Its not like Bigfoot would be in an ocean so if there was such a thing, we would know about it and the population would likely be much bigger today.
Posted by BlackAdam
Member since Jan 2016
7137 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:42 pm to
quote:


People still argue about this while the mongoloids who made the fricking thing admitted it’s just one of them in a suit.


That has not happened. One individual has claimed to be the man in the suit, but he has given so many contradictory statements that his credibility is hard to rely on, and he could not replicate the bizarre gait of the creature.
Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
22202 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

That has not happened. One individual has claimed to be the man in the suit, but he has given so many contradictory statements that his credibility is hard to rely on, and he could not replicate the bizarre gait of the creature.


Ok I’ll give you that. I’m not going to argue semantics about a mystical creature that doesn’t exist.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
91129 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

a mystical creature that doesn’t exist.


best not be talking about the Easter Bunny, baw
Posted by ShoeBang
Member since May 2012
22202 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

best not be talking about the Easter Bunny, baw


Is a giant bipedal rabbit more or less real than Bigfoot?
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
91129 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Is a giant bipedal rabbit more or less real than Bigfoot?


pretty sure I saw them both at the gym this morning
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram