- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
We need to send as many troops and as much money as it takes to win
Posted on 3/18/26 at 9:33 pm
Posted on 3/18/26 at 9:33 pm
Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. Who cares how many troops are deployed or how much money it takes? The alternative is state-sponsored terrorism running amok and a fundamentalist regime with doomsday weapons. Trump is making the right decision by staying strong on this. Do it right!
Posted on 3/18/26 at 9:52 pm to Ingeniero
How many of your kids are you willing to deploy to this war?
Posted on 3/18/26 at 9:54 pm to Ingeniero
“Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” — George Santayana
Posted on 3/18/26 at 9:54 pm to uziyourillusion
How many of your kids are you willing to let die from a nuke? Radiation poisoning? Radical, extreme Islamic terrorism?
Posted on 3/18/26 at 9:55 pm to KCRoyalBlue
That’s a question for Israel, not America. I don’t care if Tel Aviv is a smoking crater.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 9:56 pm to KCRoyalBlue
I feel like the likelihood of them dying in war is a lot higher
Posted on 3/18/26 at 9:56 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
Tulsi gabbard literally just testified that they don’t have any and they don’t have the capabilities to have them with midnight hammer operation being a success.
quote:
Who cares how many troops are deployed or how much money it takes? The alternative is state-sponsored terrorism running amok and a fundamentalist regime with doomsday weapons. Trump is making the right decision by staying strong on this. Do it right!
As a veteran, I say this emphatically: frick you.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 9:58 pm to uziyourillusion
quote:
That’s a question for Israel, not America. I don’t care if Tel Aviv is a smoking crater.
It's clear you're an anti-american, antisemitic, jew hating satan worshiper. You're also definitely leftist filth.
(I think I did that right)
Posted on 3/18/26 at 9:58 pm to monsterballads
As a veteran I say frick you!
Posted on 3/18/26 at 10:01 pm to Ingeniero
Mobilizing a massive ground invasion would be one of the worst idea in history. This isn’t Iraq or Afghanistan. Our invasion force would likely need to be between 350-500,000
Those 2200 marines are going to be put into combat on the ground in the areas around the straight they’re dug into. Hope they get their combat action badges.
I’d bet my left nut we likely have all 3 special forces type Delta, Seals, and Green Berets in the country doing something or another and some of them most likely the Seals for obvious reason being navy and all will drop ship in to assist them.
If we want to take Kharg island we could mobilize a force of a few thousand and do that; but since no forces are moving there other than the MEU if we do plan to take it and control it one of the other special forces teams will likely do it. Probably Delta force.
That’s all you’re going to see as far as putting people on the ground, and yes some of those marines will almost certainly sadly be KIA and instead of respecting their sacrifice the enemies within will politicize it.
Those 2200 marines are going to be put into combat on the ground in the areas around the straight they’re dug into. Hope they get their combat action badges.
I’d bet my left nut we likely have all 3 special forces type Delta, Seals, and Green Berets in the country doing something or another and some of them most likely the Seals for obvious reason being navy and all will drop ship in to assist them.
If we want to take Kharg island we could mobilize a force of a few thousand and do that; but since no forces are moving there other than the MEU if we do plan to take it and control it one of the other special forces teams will likely do it. Probably Delta force.
That’s all you’re going to see as far as putting people on the ground, and yes some of those marines will almost certainly sadly be KIA and instead of respecting their sacrifice the enemies within will politicize it.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 10:14 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
We need to send as many troops and as much money as it takes to win
When you going to OCS or BCT?
Posted on 3/18/26 at 10:24 pm to Ingeniero
quote:
We need to send as many troops and as much money as it takes to win
You first bud.
quote:
Who cares how many troops are deployed or how much money it takes?
A lot of parents do.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 10:26 pm to NYNolaguy1
Just don’t deploy too many that we don’t have enough to go fight China when they move on Taiwan here shortly. Might as well dial up another 600k for North Korea too.
If I had to choose to die I think it would be North Korea. I bet the scenery is nicer and might get some Asian poon beforehand
If I had to choose to die I think it would be North Korea. I bet the scenery is nicer and might get some Asian poon beforehand
Posted on 3/18/26 at 10:26 pm to lsuoilengr
Lol China isn't doing shite
Posted on 3/18/26 at 10:28 pm to Ingeniero
You’re an idiot. A legitimate idiot.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 11:04 pm to MichaelScottsMug
Poe’s law strikes again.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 11:19 pm to uziyourillusion
quote:
How many of your children...
That is a bad faith argument. That is like asking someone if they are going to be a fire fighter if they expect the Fire Dept to do their job if your house ever catches on fire.
Posted on 3/18/26 at 11:28 pm to Jbird
quote:
Lol China isn't doing shite
Actually, China loves this shite. While we're getting mired in another ME conflict, they're playing nice across the world, securing resources and trading partnerships.
Meanwhile, we are changing tariffs every time Donny gets a diaper change, looking less and less like a reliable trading partner.
But I'm sure there's a 4D chess move the true believers will let me know about.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 12:16 am to Neutral Underground
No it’s not, if I’m not willing to send my own children (or myself) to a conflict, how could I be okay sending someone else’s? It’s easy to act all horaah on an Internet forum where you’re not the one being targeted by drones or missiles. If we send in ground troops, countless numbers of young guys are going to get killed or maimed for Israel’s war. I wouldn’t want to lose my child fighting on behalf of Israel and I could never ask someone else to risk their child when I wouldn’t be willing to either.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:24 am to Ingeniero
The troll is strong in this thread.
Popular
Back to top

8








