Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Middle-income homebuyers have $30,000 more buying power than a year ago, research finds

Posted on 3/10/26 at 5:43 pm
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
28779 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 5:43 pm
quote:

U.S. households that have a median income — an estimated $86,300 — and enough money for a 20% down payment can now afford a $331,483 home, up $30,302 from $301,181 a year ago, according to a new report from Zillow. By "afford," Zillow means that the monthly mortgage payment, including insurance and property taxes, would be under 30% of a household's income.


quote:

The improvement is at least partly due to interest rates that have come down slowly. The average rate on a fixed 30-year mortgage was 5.99% as of Feb. 27 but has since ticked up to 6.14%, according to Mortgage News Daily. A year ago, it was 6.79%.

For mortgages, even rates that are 0.5 percentage point lower can make a difference, said Kara Ng, senior economist at Zillow and author of the report.

"As a rough estimate, a half-point drop in mortgage rates could mean savings of about $1,000 a year for a typical U.S. home," Ng said.

A 1 percentage point drop in rates could expand the pool of households that can afford to buy a home by about 5.5 million households, including roughly 1.6 million renters who could become first-time homebuyers, according to the National Association of Realtors. NAR said it estimated the income needed to afford a median-priced home assuming a 30-year mortgage, 10% down payment, and mortgage payment of 25% of income, and then calculated using a 7% mortgage rate and a 6% rate.

However, affordability remains strained. While the amount a median-income household can afford is higher than a year ago, that figure remains below the median price of a single-family home, which was $400,300 in January, according to NAR.

Based on that price and a 6.19% mortgage rate, the average in January, buyers would need an income of $94,032 to qualify for a mortgage, according to the NAR's affordability index. That measurement also assumes the buyer has a 20% down payment, which in this case would be $80,060.


LINK
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
40742 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 5:47 pm to
I'm gonna guess that the number of households that gross 86k don't have 66k in liquid funds to put down on a house is pretty damn low.
This post was edited on 3/10/26 at 5:48 pm
Posted by wm72
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2010
9347 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 5:55 pm to
So, the middle class families struggling to make ends meet that can pull $80,060 in cash out their savings account are in decent shape?

Thanks economic expert.
This post was edited on 3/10/26 at 5:58 pm
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
4857 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 5:55 pm to
Whole lot of gymnastics to just say a 1% reduction makes a big difference over thirty years.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26378 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 5:58 pm to
I also laugh at the word tricks in these discussions.

The median home is $400k.

Why are first time homebuyers buying the average home?
If you are a first time homebuyer, should you expect to be buying the average size/price home?
Or maybe something on the lower end of the spectrum?

If you are a second time homebuyer, the median home makes a lot more sense.
Posted by lsuconnman
Baton rouge
Member since Feb 2007
4857 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 6:17 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 3/17/26 at 1:44 pm
Posted by MC5601
Tyler, Texas
Member since Jan 2010
4271 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

Why are first time homebuyers buying the average home? If you are a first time homebuyer, should you expect to be buying the average size/price home? Or maybe something on the lower end of the spectrum? If you are a second time homebuyer, the median home makes a lot more sense.


The average age of a first time home buyer is now 40, not 27 like it may have been a few decades ago. Those 40 year olds are married with 2-3 kids and need a house to support them. Buying something on the lower end of the spectrum is not an option when you are trying to house 4/5 people and need a good school district
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
176631 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

If you are a first time homebuyer, should you expect to be buying the average size/price home?
Or maybe something on the lower end of the spectrum?

Because thanks to the democrats systematic destruction of the suburbs the first time lower end houses are in neighborhoods filled with shithole trash.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26378 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Buying something on the lower end of the spectrum is not an option when you are trying to house 4/5 people and need a good school district


Lol

Are you serious?

Average homes are 2400-2500 square feet.
A family of 3 (with a budget) can afford to move into a 2100 square foot home more than comfortably.

New constructions in my area are averaging 3000 square feet. But I can acknowledge that North Georgia may not equate to the national average.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26378 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

The average age of a first time home buyer is now 40, not 27 like it may have been a few decades ago. Those 40 year olds are married with 2-3 kids and need a house to support them.


Redfin has the average age of a first time homebuyer at age 35.

You are referencing the National Association of Realtors survey. No offense. But that is a "mail-in" survey. Lol.
Posted by DonJuanDaMiles
San Diego, CA
Member since Feb 2014
1386 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

I'm gonna guess that the number of households that gross 86k don't have 66k in liquid funds to put down on a house is pretty damn low.


I do but the median price in San Diego is $900k+
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
48056 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

If you are a first time homebuyer, should you expect to be buying the average size/price home? Or maybe something on the lower end of the spectrum?
this might a get off my lawn comment but a starter home should be just that, small and inexpensive relative to the market in perhaps not the most desirable neighborhood. The equity ladder has been the means to acquire the “average home” since WW2. The home I’ve owned for 20 years isn’t worth anywhere near 400K and never will be.
Posted by SmackDaniels
Gulf Breeze, FL
Member since Mar 2007
15443 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

I'm gonna guess that the number of households that gross 86k don't have 66k in liquid funds to put down on a house is pretty damn low.


1031 exchange
Posted by lostinbr
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Oct 2017
12765 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

I also laugh at the word tricks in these discussions.

The median home is $400k.

Why are first time homebuyers buying the average home?
If you are a first time homebuyer, should you expect to be buying the average size/price home?
Or maybe something on the lower end of the spectrum?

If you are a second time homebuyer, the median home makes a lot more sense.

They’re comparing the median household income to the median price of single-family homes, though. Does the starter home discussion really make sense in that context?

By the same logic, shouldn’t a typical first-time homebuyer have less than the median household income?
Posted by Bayou_Tiger_225
Third Earth
Member since Mar 2016
12655 posts
Posted on 3/10/26 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

They’re comparing the median household income to the median price of single-family homes, though. Does the starter home discussion really make sense in that context? By the same logic, shouldn’t a typical first-time homebuyer have less than the median household income?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram