Started By
Message

Senate bill targets Elon and SpaceX, only allowing up to 50% of launches from one provider

Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:14 pm
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
67198 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:14 pm
I bet you don't have to look far to find that the senators pockets are being lined by Rocket Lab, Blue Origin, Boeing and others.
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
13409 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:15 pm to
If it weren’t for SpaceX, we wouldn’t have a space program. Is NASA doing anything meaningful these days?
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
294 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:15 pm to
Well that’s a waste of time that won’t pass.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Top 1% On Onlyfans
Member since Dec 2008
51782 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:15 pm to
How about we just let whoever can do it the best for the least?
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
294 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

How about we just let whoever can do it the best for the least?


Because Elon isn’t on the right side politically.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
18178 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:16 pm to
That'd be fine if the others were capable... but...
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
84260 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:17 pm to
LOL, talk about cutting off your nose to spite your face...

Have any others reliably put payload into space at this point? I mean, SpaceX is launching 80-100 times a year without any incidents.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
67198 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Have any others reliably put payload into space at this point? I mean, SpaceX is launching 80-100 times a year without any incidents.


Blue Origin (Bezos) is doing fairly well but nowhere near the volume Elon is putting up there. This bill is likely being driven by BO or Rocket Lab.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28202 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:25 pm to
You can seek waivers. I’m fine with getting more competition in this space. Probably something scaled would be better to pass (eg 80% by 2028, 70% by 2030…)
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
84260 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Probably something scaled would be better to pass (eg 80% by 2028, 70% by 2030…)


True... but also, SpaceX isn't a cost plus contract.

So any company can go out there and bid and out hustle them if they'd like. Thats one way SpaceX got to where they are. Early on, Elon sued the govt multiple times for giving out non-bid contracts they ultimately had to retract and which he won.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
67198 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:41 pm to
quote:

You can seek waivers.

With no guarantee of approval and dramatically slowing down launch cadence. They plan these launches sometimes years in advance. I don't know how long this bill would be active, but the next time the presidency or senate flips, easily could have a Dem administrator or committee that denies any waivers for Elon, for political reasons.

quote:

I’m fine with getting more competition in this space.

Reliable launch vehicles aren't like opening a lemonade stand. They require billions in investment, decade(s) of development, and the right person running the program. It's a zero-fail industry. Limiting half your launches to provably subpar products is the height of stupidity.

Once again government, greed, regulations, pettiness, and hubris get in the way of the US space program being where it should be. Now China and others have almost caught up.
Posted by CoachFranWasHere
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2021
759 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:47 pm to
This is literally the Equalization of Opportunity Bill from Atlas Shrugged.
Posted by Wraytex
San Antonio - Gonzales
Member since Jun 2020
3711 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:49 pm to
Guess the uniparty misses the kickbacks for the Putin cab rides.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
95002 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 3:57 pm to
Elon should move his whole operation to another country as an FU to our fig politicians.
Posted by bbvdd
Memphis, TN
Member since Jun 2009
28429 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:00 pm to
There would still be American astronauts stuck at the space station if it weren't for Elon and SpaceX.
Posted by crewdepoo
Hogwarts
Member since Jan 2015
10950 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:04 pm to
So capitalism?
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
31554 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:05 pm to
How about a competitive bid process? If one company gets 100% but saves the tax payers billions then who gives a frick.
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
12343 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:06 pm to
So, frick safety and efficiency.
Posted by MasonTiger
Mason, Ohio
Member since Jan 2005
18702 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

Is NASA doing anything meaningful these days?
Other than rolling a defective giant rocket back and forth from a launch pad you mean?
Posted by Trevaylin
south texas
Member since Feb 2019
10366 posts
Posted on 2/26/26 at 4:13 pm to
Musk/Space ex will do fine. they will just keep the volume up with China/russia contracts.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram