- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Leftists. how are you being prepared to defend Bill and Hill before their testimony Thurs?
Posted on 2/24/26 at 7:44 am
Posted on 2/24/26 at 7:44 am
Remember.. you are supposed to be laser focused on the Epstein revelations and demanding quick and swift accountability.
Well you have been told that prior to this week.
Epstien was at the White House 16 times and Bill flew on the Epstien express 27 times. Also, Gislaine Maxwell was an invited guess at Chelsea Clinton's wedding.
Even visited twice on one day multiple times.
Meanwhile, Hillary said they have "no ties" to either Epstein or Maxwell. An obvious lie.. that you have not been told to be mad about.
Remember, Hillary tells her boldest lies to attempt to cover for something really damaging.
So what is the pre damage control that is being communicated? Focus on planned SOTU theatrics? Focus on queen Savannah's mom? Or ignore and hide out a few days?
Well you have been told that prior to this week.
Epstien was at the White House 16 times and Bill flew on the Epstien express 27 times. Also, Gislaine Maxwell was an invited guess at Chelsea Clinton's wedding.
Even visited twice on one day multiple times.
Meanwhile, Hillary said they have "no ties" to either Epstein or Maxwell. An obvious lie.. that you have not been told to be mad about.
Remember, Hillary tells her boldest lies to attempt to cover for something really damaging.
So what is the pre damage control that is being communicated? Focus on planned SOTU theatrics? Focus on queen Savannah's mom? Or ignore and hide out a few days?
17
Posted on 2/24/26 at 7:45 am to CleverUserName
Do we know if this will be an open hearing or closed door?
Posted on 2/24/26 at 7:50 am to CleverUserName
And of course, nothing but crickets from the left who infest this board like cockroaches.
Pathetic.
Pathetic.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 7:58 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Do we know if this will be an open hearing or closed door?
It is a deposition. It will be closed door. Of course Clinton's were screaming to make it public.
Have you ever heard of a public deposition? Of course not. Ol' Slick ain't as Slick as he once was.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 8:00 am to BarnHater
quote:
And of course, nothing but crickets from the left who infest this board like cockroaches.
Sounds like the plan is to Duck and ignore for a few days. After previously being sooooo concerned about the files' revelations. And of course parroting that "noooo it's not political!!"
Seems a little strange that the president thst has actually been busted for sexually exploiting a young and impressionable intern in the White House is apparently escaping allll concern over several trips of Epstein to the White House and his many flights on Epstien's plane.
Curious indeed.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 8:13 am to CleverUserName
The right is desperate to convince themselves the left cares about Bill & Hillary. Nobody gives a shite about them, especially if they are in fact legitimately guilty of something.
But it’s awesome we’re setting the precedent for former presidents to be forced to testify. Trump will have to do the same (unless he dies first).
But it’s awesome we’re setting the precedent for former presidents to be forced to testify. Trump will have to do the same (unless he dies first).
Posted on 2/24/26 at 8:20 am to BarnHater
I don’t know of anything that require defending. A visit to the White House may be distasteful but not unlawful.
There’s no clear evidence that Bill or Hillary broke any laws.
On the other hand, private correspondence is incriminating for other bigwigs, including DJT, Jr., The Andrew formerly known as Prince, Bannon and others…
There’s no clear evidence that Bill or Hillary broke any laws.
On the other hand, private correspondence is incriminating for other bigwigs, including DJT, Jr., The Andrew formerly known as Prince, Bannon and others…
This post was edited on 2/24/26 at 8:22 am
Posted on 2/24/26 at 8:22 am to mwade91383
quote:
The right is desperate to convince themselves the left cares about Bill & Hillary. Nobody gives a shite about them, especially if they are in fact legitimately guilty of something.
Ok. There it is. "We have never cared about them".
Not a solid choice due to the anger of "it was her turn" over the 16 election. But I understand you folks don't have much to work with.
How about you wait till the democrats in this committee run their talking points before you stick your neck out on their command?
quote:
Trump will have to do the same (unless he dies first).
Yes. We know you loons will not stop trying to shoot him. Jus like the three previous attempts, your success on Kirk, and the tranny brigade shooting up schools and other groups.
This post was edited on 2/24/26 at 10:33 am
Posted on 2/24/26 at 8:24 am to CleverUserName
Hillary: I only hanged him once, I mean hung out with him.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 8:25 am to VOR
quote:
don’t know of anything that require defending. A visit to the White House may be distasteful but not unlawful. There’s no clear evidence that Bill or Hillary broke any law
Can u imagine if there were literally pics of DJT in a pool with ghislaine and a young female AT Epstein Island no less? Or a young female lying on the floor next to a prone DJT? Somehow its Slick willie and its a nothingburger to retards like VOR.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 8:32 am to CleverUserName
Can you point me to ONE real person who is getting out there stumping for them? Have you ever met one or talked to one in real life? Who do you know that is concerned about Bill & Hillarys testimony?
This is a classic example of the very online rightwing having NO basis in reality.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 8:57 am to CleverUserName
I predict that their "testimony" will somehow center around bLuMpF being inexplicably caught in the very middle of everything. I predict they will name bLuMpF multiple times through deflectionism when pressed on their own involvement.
Panem et circenses. Let's see if I'm right, or of the Clintons went a little too far off script and have become expendable pawns in the eyes of the Establishment Uniparty. Could honestly go either way at this point, but my money is on Bill and Hill walking away unscathed because they know where too many of the bodies are buried. Literally.
Panem et circenses. Let's see if I'm right, or of the Clintons went a little too far off script and have become expendable pawns in the eyes of the Establishment Uniparty. Could honestly go either way at this point, but my money is on Bill and Hill walking away unscathed because they know where too many of the bodies are buried. Literally.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 8:58 am to VOR
quote:Such as………?
On the other hand, private correspondence is incriminating for other bigwigs, including DJT,
I need actual evidence. Not just “his name was in the files”.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 9:04 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
Do we know if this will be an open hearing or closed door?
They won't even be there in person. They will be at their home in New York on a zoom call. These cowardly fricking GOP losers should have demanded they testify in person or go to fricking jail.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 9:12 am to AlterEd
100% bunch of traitorous pussies
Posted on 2/24/26 at 9:24 am to CleverUserName
Can you spell?
Posted on 2/24/26 at 9:37 am to Sweep Da Leg
they will lie and say they voted for Trump
Posted on 2/24/26 at 9:39 am to CleverUserName
Meh, here is the entire content of the hearing:
"We claim our right to the protections of the 5th amendment"
"We claim our right to the protections of the 5th amendment"
Posted on 2/24/26 at 9:43 am to CleverUserName
Hilary tried to act all ballsy a few weeks ago claiming she wanted their depo to be on primetime television. She wanted the opportunity to say Trump was in the files eleventy-billion times. Trump countered by releasing 3 million pages which pretty much showed he didn't do shite.
The Clintons should be the first U.S. perp walk but we all know how that story ends with a giant nothing burger.
The Clintons should be the first U.S. perp walk but we all know how that story ends with a giant nothing burger.
Posted on 2/24/26 at 9:44 am to Timeoday
quote:Doesn't he want this done in public?
Ol' Slick ain't Slick as he once was.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News