- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Southern University takes on low graduation rates: ‘Biggest thing we’ve got to tackle
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:56 pm
This won't change. SU graduates rates have been in the pits of hell forever. It's not gonna change. The only way to increase college graduation rates is to increase standards and increasing standards will significantly lower enrollment so it won't happen. And now SU has to compete with LSU for black students. However, LSU is now seen as the more trendy cool "black school". In recent years I've even seen some LSU black students call it a "HBCU". Also it has a much better campus and reputation and LSU black students can just drive to north BR for that real HBCU experience. SU is screwed. There are some very successful graduates that come out of SU but SU will never be taken seriously with its low graduation rate and academic reputation. Even most black students think SU is ghetto and beneath them which is why they are going to LSU making it ghetto and lowering its reputation ... vicious hysterical cycle ain't it
LINK
------------------
Discussions about Southern University’s graduation rates often carry an implied criticism: Students are not finishing because they are not trying hard enough. That assumption is simple, convenient — and wrong.
Southern’s challenge is not motivation. It is time. More specifically, it is the mismatch between traditional college timelines designed for financially supported, full-time students and the realities of students who must work to support themselves and their families.
Only 11% of Southern students in the 2016 cohort earned a bachelor’s degree within four years, according to data reported to the National Center for Education Statistics. The figure alarms policymakers, frustrates administrators and troubles alumni who understand the institution’s impact. But it should not surprise those familiar with the students Southern serves.
Southern is an access institution. It enrolls first-generation college students, low-income students and Pell Grant recipients. Many come from families unable to cover tuition, housing, books, food, transportation and unexpected expenses. For these students, employment is not optional or supplemental. Many are primary contributors to household income, paying rent, utilities and other family expenses.
The four-year graduation model assumes that college is a student’s primary responsibility. For many Southern students, that assumption does not hold.
Working 20, 30 or even 40 hours a week fundamentally reshapes the college experience. Students often reduce course loads to accommodate work schedules. Required classes may fill before they can register. Advising appointments conflict with shifts. Internships are frequently unpaid, making them inaccessible. Summer classes are often replaced with full-time employment. Missing a single prerequisite can delay graduation by a year.
Viewed over time, a six-year path to a degree appears less like failure and more like inevitability.
One factor often missing from graduation-rate discussions is the cost of time. Graduating “on time” is most attainable for students who can afford to treat college as their sole job. Southern students are navigating higher education while managing economic survival, and the standard metrics penalize them for doing both.
University leaders acknowledge the complexity. Chancellor John Pierre has said the issue is multifaceted, noting Southern’s commitment to enrolling students with financial need, limited family experience with higher education and responsibilities that do not pause during exams or semesters. That mission complicates graduation metrics but defines the institution.
Comparisons with peer institutions often lack context. Graduation rates are frequently presented as isolated numbers. Comparisons with Grambling State University, Dillard University or LSU do not reflect how many Southern students send money home, work instead of withdrawing, or stop out temporarily to regain financial stability. The data capture timelines, not persistence.
Southern’s recent $2 million grant to modernize its data infrastructure is a step forward. Early alerts, proactive advising and targeted academic interventions are important, as is the hiring of additional advisers and the rebuilding of in-person academic engagement disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
But data systems alone cannot resolve economic constraints.
If Louisiana expects Southern to improve graduation outcomes, it must reduce the financial pressures that extend students’ timelines. That includes addressing the long-standing funding gap between Southern and LSU, expanding need-based financial aid, increasing paid internship opportunities, providing emergency grants and investing in affordable housing and food security. Retention is not only an academic issue. It is also a labor issue.
The definition of success also deserves reconsideration.
A student who graduates in six years while working, supporting family members, avoiding excessive debt and remaining enrolled demonstrates persistence and resilience. That outcome should not be framed as institutional failure. Southern’s role has long been to create upward mobility under challenging conditions.
The four-year graduation rate should be a goal, not a moral judgment.
Southern’s challenge is balancing accountability with honesty. Improving systems and outcomes matters. But progress requires acknowledging reality. Southern’s students are not disengaged. They are stretched.
Until higher education confronts the financial realities facing working students, graduation rates will continue to tell only part of the story. Southern, operating with limited resources, will continue educating students who take longer paths — not because they wander, but because the journey is harder.
Access and opportunity lose meaning if institutions pretend the distance is the same for everyone.
Cutline: Graduation rates at Louisiana HBCUs
Graduation rates for full-time, first-time bachelor’s degree-seeking students in the 2016 cohort at Louisiana’s four-year historically Black colleges and universities, shown at the four-, six- and eight-year marks. Southern University and A&M College trails most in four-year completion but shows gains over longer timelines, reflecting the extended paths many working students take to earn degrees. Sources: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (IPEDS).
LINK
------------------
Discussions about Southern University’s graduation rates often carry an implied criticism: Students are not finishing because they are not trying hard enough. That assumption is simple, convenient — and wrong.
Southern’s challenge is not motivation. It is time. More specifically, it is the mismatch between traditional college timelines designed for financially supported, full-time students and the realities of students who must work to support themselves and their families.
Only 11% of Southern students in the 2016 cohort earned a bachelor’s degree within four years, according to data reported to the National Center for Education Statistics. The figure alarms policymakers, frustrates administrators and troubles alumni who understand the institution’s impact. But it should not surprise those familiar with the students Southern serves.
Southern is an access institution. It enrolls first-generation college students, low-income students and Pell Grant recipients. Many come from families unable to cover tuition, housing, books, food, transportation and unexpected expenses. For these students, employment is not optional or supplemental. Many are primary contributors to household income, paying rent, utilities and other family expenses.
The four-year graduation model assumes that college is a student’s primary responsibility. For many Southern students, that assumption does not hold.
Working 20, 30 or even 40 hours a week fundamentally reshapes the college experience. Students often reduce course loads to accommodate work schedules. Required classes may fill before they can register. Advising appointments conflict with shifts. Internships are frequently unpaid, making them inaccessible. Summer classes are often replaced with full-time employment. Missing a single prerequisite can delay graduation by a year.
Viewed over time, a six-year path to a degree appears less like failure and more like inevitability.
One factor often missing from graduation-rate discussions is the cost of time. Graduating “on time” is most attainable for students who can afford to treat college as their sole job. Southern students are navigating higher education while managing economic survival, and the standard metrics penalize them for doing both.
University leaders acknowledge the complexity. Chancellor John Pierre has said the issue is multifaceted, noting Southern’s commitment to enrolling students with financial need, limited family experience with higher education and responsibilities that do not pause during exams or semesters. That mission complicates graduation metrics but defines the institution.
Comparisons with peer institutions often lack context. Graduation rates are frequently presented as isolated numbers. Comparisons with Grambling State University, Dillard University or LSU do not reflect how many Southern students send money home, work instead of withdrawing, or stop out temporarily to regain financial stability. The data capture timelines, not persistence.
Southern’s recent $2 million grant to modernize its data infrastructure is a step forward. Early alerts, proactive advising and targeted academic interventions are important, as is the hiring of additional advisers and the rebuilding of in-person academic engagement disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic.
But data systems alone cannot resolve economic constraints.
If Louisiana expects Southern to improve graduation outcomes, it must reduce the financial pressures that extend students’ timelines. That includes addressing the long-standing funding gap between Southern and LSU, expanding need-based financial aid, increasing paid internship opportunities, providing emergency grants and investing in affordable housing and food security. Retention is not only an academic issue. It is also a labor issue.
The definition of success also deserves reconsideration.
A student who graduates in six years while working, supporting family members, avoiding excessive debt and remaining enrolled demonstrates persistence and resilience. That outcome should not be framed as institutional failure. Southern’s role has long been to create upward mobility under challenging conditions.
The four-year graduation rate should be a goal, not a moral judgment.
Southern’s challenge is balancing accountability with honesty. Improving systems and outcomes matters. But progress requires acknowledging reality. Southern’s students are not disengaged. They are stretched.
Until higher education confronts the financial realities facing working students, graduation rates will continue to tell only part of the story. Southern, operating with limited resources, will continue educating students who take longer paths — not because they wander, but because the journey is harder.
Access and opportunity lose meaning if institutions pretend the distance is the same for everyone.
Cutline: Graduation rates at Louisiana HBCUs
Graduation rates for full-time, first-time bachelor’s degree-seeking students in the 2016 cohort at Louisiana’s four-year historically Black colleges and universities, shown at the four-, six- and eight-year marks. Southern University and A&M College trails most in four-year completion but shows gains over longer timelines, reflecting the extended paths many working students take to earn degrees. Sources: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (IPEDS).
This post was edited on 2/21/26 at 4:33 pm
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:58 pm to PelicanState87
Isn’t SU sub-10%?
It is essentially impossible to not improve.
It is essentially impossible to not improve.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 2:59 pm to PelicanState87
Even when they do graduate, SU degrees are toilet paper. I work with several PhDs. in education that are borderline retarded.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 3:01 pm to Scruffy
quote:
sn’t SU sub-10%?
It is essentially impossible to not improve.
It will never be over 50% which is what's needed to change its academic reputation for the better. SU is the dumping ground for the worse of the worse students. SU used to be a top choice for the best in-state black students, but that has changed ... now it's 1) LSU 2) UL 3) Southeastern ... SU is like last place.
This post was edited on 2/21/26 at 3:02 pm
Posted on 2/21/26 at 3:07 pm to PelicanState87
quote:
SU used to be a top choice for the best in-state black students, but that has changed
HBCUs haven’t been the same since integration
Posted on 2/21/26 at 3:29 pm to PelicanState87
No need to shite on Southern. It still provides opportunities for those who otherwise wouldn't have any.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 3:29 pm to PelicanState87
quote:
worse of the worse
Looks like you took English at Southern.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 3:37 pm to PelicanState87
Wait until they finish the STEM building. They're gonna attract top talent from all over the world.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 3:42 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Isn’t SU sub-10%?
SUNO is for sure
SUBR is probably a little higher
Posted on 2/21/26 at 4:00 pm to PelicanState87
HBCU’s have historically low graduation rates. The schools don’t really GAF bc they get the fed dollar essentially without strings.
Average graduation rates from one of those schools is 23%. Yikes.
Even Alcorn State made top 20 HBCU in graduation. SU nowhere to be found on the list
Average graduation rates from one of those schools is 23%. Yikes.
Even Alcorn State made top 20 HBCU in graduation. SU nowhere to be found on the list
Posted on 2/21/26 at 4:02 pm to PelicanState87
Too many people are going to college these days. It’s not for everybody but our stupid politicians have made it political and convinced everybody that it’s some kind of right. The ones that go to places like this but don’t graduate are just going to live off student loans and never repay them. Trade schools need to make a big comeback.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 4:03 pm to PelicanState87
quote:
However, LSU is now seen as the more trendy cool "black school".
What is that doing to the scores at LSU?
Posted on 2/21/26 at 4:07 pm to Stevo
Bwhahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhhahahahahahahahhaahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahhaahhahaa!!
Posted on 2/21/26 at 5:57 pm to PelicanState87
Isn’t LSU’s 4-year graduation rate sub 40% in 2025?
Posted on 2/21/26 at 6:05 pm to LordSaintly
quote:
HBCUs haven’t been the same since integration
This.
HBCUs had a strong role in the past.
But now, talented black students go to better colleges. And for those who need a non-traditional experience… online learning gives them many more options.
And many of their students are not prepared for college. That’s even harder to change. Because if they are prepared… they choose another college.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 6:13 pm to LSUFanHouston
quote:
And many of their students are not prepared for college. That’s even harder to change. Because if they are prepared… they choose another college.
Exactly, and many of these schools have low admissions standards because they can’t afford to turn anyone away.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 6:19 pm to Stevo
quote:At what cost per success story?
No need to shite on Southern. It still provides opportunities for those who otherwise wouldn't have any.
And the legion of under-educated “graduates” they produce who are unprepared to perform in the workplace.
Southern masquerades as an institution of higher learning: it wastes resources and cheats the vast majority of their students out of time, money and opportunity.
Close it down. Reallocate the resources going to the losing proposition.
This post was edited on 2/21/26 at 6:20 pm
Popular
Back to top

9









