- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Can the executive branch sue the legislature for failure to do work?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 2/20/26 at 8:40 pm
Every thing seems to be done by legal adversary in front of a judge now a days. The executive branch can't do anything without the lawyers pilling on. But if the executive branch needed a clear direction on say, tariffs and international negotiation , could the House be sued to provide in a timely manner
Posted on 2/20/26 at 8:45 pm to Trevaylin
No we're just screwed.
Trump hasn't really drained the Swamp. He simply exposes how deep it is, by trying and failing to perform that impossible task.
Edit - There's a reason Elon gave up.
Trump hasn't really drained the Swamp. He simply exposes how deep it is, by trying and failing to perform that impossible task.
Edit - There's a reason Elon gave up.
This post was edited on 2/20/26 at 8:46 pm
Posted on 2/20/26 at 8:52 pm to Trevaylin
Failure to adhere to their platform could very easily be looked at as fraud. No one in the Executive has the balls to go that route, however.
There are other things the Executive could do to essentially neuter Congress. Again, no one has the balls.
There are other things the Executive could do to essentially neuter Congress. Again, no one has the balls.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:05 pm to Trevaylin
The Legislative branch has willingly ceded much of its authority to the Judicial because members of Congress don’t want to make hard decisions and endanger their re-election prospects.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 9:17 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
Every thing seems to be done by legal adversary in front of a judge now a days. The executive branch can't do anything without the lawyers pilling on. But if the executive branch needed a clear direction on say, tariffs and international negotiation , could the House be sued to provide in a timely manner
The legislative branch doesn’t work for the executive branch. They are coequal branches of government.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 10:33 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
The legislative branch doesn’t work for the executive branch.
Or the "people"... apparently.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 3:27 am to Trevaylin
Sure let’s just let the president keep suing the government so he can keep taking more taxpayer money for himself.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 3:41 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
The legislative branch doesn’t work for the executive branch. They are coequal branches of government.
Some are more equal than others..I laughed at the No Kings nonsense because they sure aimed at the wrong target. The judicial branch thinks they are God Emperors.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 9:03 am to Trevaylin
The judiciary is supposed to be the weakest of the 3, but it has garnered more power than it should.
There definitely needs to be recourse. Imo the President should have every right to go to SCOTUS directly to get things determined quickly. As they are supposed to be each other's equal. Not held up in the lower courts for his things.
It's like the CEO of a company having to go to a first year paralegal to get what he wants started up the ranks of the legal dept. Instead of just being able to walk into the head of legals office and hashing things out. Things move too fast, and deserve quick definitive answers.
Something should be handled in the same way with Congress. Expedite. Though the useless folks there are are just political grandstanders, not politicians.
There definitely needs to be recourse. Imo the President should have every right to go to SCOTUS directly to get things determined quickly. As they are supposed to be each other's equal. Not held up in the lower courts for his things.
It's like the CEO of a company having to go to a first year paralegal to get what he wants started up the ranks of the legal dept. Instead of just being able to walk into the head of legals office and hashing things out. Things move too fast, and deserve quick definitive answers.
Something should be handled in the same way with Congress. Expedite. Though the useless folks there are are just political grandstanders, not politicians.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 9:08 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Or the "people"... apparently.
Sure they do.
The system is working exactly as it is designed to work.
We have exactly the government that we keep choosing.
And that's the thing about populism. You want to know who is to blame for all the nonsense they engage in? Go look in the mirror.
Especially if you voted for a single incumbent during the last round of primaries.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 9:08 am to HagaDaga
quote:
The judiciary is supposed to be the weakest of the 3
Where does it say that in the Constitution?
Posted on 2/21/26 at 9:10 am to Trevaylin
quote:
Can the executive branch sue the legislature for failure to do work?
Asinine.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 9:11 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Or the "people"... apparently.
True,
The people have some influence but it's limited by rigged election systems.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 9:13 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Especially if you voted for a single incumbent during the last round of primaries.
There are 435 house critters and 100 senate critters.
My vote, while could possibly affect 3 seats, has no bearing on 99.4% of the composition of the legislative branch. And yes, I vote in primaries.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 9:13 am to antibarner
quote:
The judicial branch thinks they are God Emperors.

Posted on 2/21/26 at 9:19 am to wackatimesthree
Traditionally it was looked at as such. They were in some backroom in DC.
Where is the the X district of ABC mentioned in the Constitution?
Where is the the X district of ABC mentioned in the Constitution?
Posted on 2/21/26 at 9:28 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
The system is working exactly as it is designed to work.
It is. Except...
..Because it is the Overlords' own system, the legislative, justice, social, and financial systems have all been rigged to fray, snap and collapse spectacularly. We are near the end of this particular current system.
What we've been witnessing aren't simultaneous bugs and flaws going haywire within the system; they've been timed-out features. Can't "Build Back Better" unless the whole thing is razed. All 3 branches of gubmint have been stalling, been inconsistent and chaotic, and toying with us.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 9:31 am to weagle1999
quote:
The Legislative branch has willingly ceded much of its authority to the Judicial because members of Congress don’t want to make hard decisions and endanger their re-election prospects.
Accurate analysis of what is happening, but it shouldn’t be — I would argue the legislative branch has an obligation to its role under the constitution.
Posted on 2/21/26 at 9:32 am to wackatimesthree
your lack of content contribution explains your mental capacity.
Popular
Back to top

8









