Started By
Message

Crecent Dunes Project in Nevada...

Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:51 am
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
31188 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:51 am
Been getting a photo of it on my sign in screen.
It's interesting to look at but, what is the purpose?
Anyone here ever really been to it?

ETA to add a link, this explains more about it, and kind of what I wanted to know, but I really like when OTers try to explain stuff. It's more fun.
LINK
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 12:02 pm
Posted by Shreve Perry
Member since Jan 2026
352 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:55 am to
Post the photo, Sir. Everyone here isn't getting your exact same Spam.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72745 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:59 am to
You do realize we can’t see your screen, right?
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
67030 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 11:59 am to
You couldn't at least google this for us
Posted by jmorr34
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2004
3391 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:00 pm to
since OP is incapable. Had to look it up myself.

quote:

The Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project is a solar thermal power project with an installed capacity of 110 megawatt and 1.1 gigawatt-hours of energy storage located near Tonopah, about 190 miles northwest of Las Vegas.





Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
33661 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:07 pm to
That thing is a bird cooker.
Posted by 9Fiddy
19th Hole
Member since Jan 2007
66677 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:09 pm to
Such a huge waste. All that land for 110 MW of capacity.

Whereas a small modular nuclear reactor typically produces 300 MW
Posted by auggie
Opelika, Alabama
Member since Aug 2013
31188 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

That thing is a bird cooker.

Yeah I bet!
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
19747 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

110 megawatt


Such a waste of space compared to other sources even if it is in the desert.

quote:

River Bend Nuclear Generating Station is a nuclear power station on a 3,300-acre (1,300 ha) site near St. Francisville, Louisiana in West Feliciana Parish, approximately 30 miles (50 km) north of Baton Rouge. The station has one sixth generation General Electric boiling water reactor that has a nominal gross electric output of about 1010 MW
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
33661 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

Such a huge waste. All that land for 110 MW of capacity.

Whereas a small modular nuclear reactor typically produces 300 MW


Now add in cooling towers or ponds.

Not saying that you're wrong, just that there's no such thing as a free lunch.
Posted by Captain Rumbeard
Member since Jan 2014
6714 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:24 pm to
Oh yeah?

How much at midnight?
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
33661 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

110 megawatt

Such a waste of space compared to other sources even if it is in the desert.

quote:
River Bend Nuclear Generating Station is a nuclear power station on a 3,300-acre (1,300 ha) site near St. Francisville, Louisiana in West Feliciana Parish, approximately 30 miles (50 km) north of Baton Rouge. The station has one sixth generation General Electric boiling water reactor that has a nominal gross electric output of about 1010 MW


Crescent Dunes is on 300 acres. So kilowatt/acre is basically the same. In fact solar is slightly ahead.

Crescent Dunes 110 MW 300 ac ˜ 367 kW/acre
River Bend 1,010 MW 3,300 ac ˜ 306 kW/acre

Posted by DCTiger
LA - FL - DC - TX
Member since Jan 2005
502 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:26 pm to
I saw this in a movie once. Was used to incinerate evidence about a company dumping chemical waste into some African nation’s water table.

The movie has the usual tropes and stereotypes — evil white European mastermind, corrupt black military leaders, female environmental do-gooder, white savior played by Matthew McConaughey.
Posted by 9Fiddy
19th Hole
Member since Jan 2007
66677 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Now add in cooling towers or ponds.

Not saying that you're wrong, just that there's no such thing as a free lunch.

For a typical nuclear plant, you are correct. But a SMR facility is less than 100 acres.
Posted by SteveLSU35
Shreveport
Member since Mar 2004
14936 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:30 pm to
There's a video out there of birds flying through, and just bursting into flames.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
17299 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Crescent Dunes 110 MW 300 ac ˜ 367 kW/acre
River Bend 1,010 MW 3,300 ac ˜ 306 kW/acre

Once you throw the energy yield into it the nuclear plant will obviously outpace the solar Wh/acre.

But i don't understand why people get so hung up on Wp or Wh per acre and totally ignore the capital requirements and cost of capital and O&M expense disparities between the two.
This post was edited on 2/11/26 at 12:48 pm
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2008
11505 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

located near Tonopah


This looks and sounds like the planet Luke Skywalker is from.
Posted by TexasTiger13
Houston, TX
Member since Oct 2014
501 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:50 pm to
The movie was called Sahara. Came out 2005.
Posted by Stexas
SWLA
Member since May 2013
6898 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:54 pm to
And to think both of them combined wouldn’t be enough for the new Meta data center once it’s fully operational…

quote:

Once fully operational, Meta’s "Hyperion" data center is projected to require approximately 2 gigawatts (2,000 megawatts) of power to support its AI compute capacity. However, recent updates indicate the site's energy footprint may grow significantly larger over time: Initial Capacity: The first phase of the campus will use over 2 GW, which is more than double the peak power demand of the entire city of New Orleans. Expansion Potential: CEO Mark Zuckerberg has stated the facility could eventually scale up to 5 gigawatts—a level comparable to the energy consumption of Manhattan.
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
33661 posts
Posted on 2/11/26 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

cost of capital and O&M expense


There's nuclear's advantage.

Question is, does that go away when you have to account for long term waste storage costs?

As I said, there's no such thing as a free lunch.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram