- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
FBI found no evidence that Epstein actually ran a pedo ring for rich men
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:45 pm
Just passing along this story which is appearing today on the internet.
LINK
FBI concluded Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t running a sex trafficking ring for powerful men, files show
Sun, February 8, 2026 at 10:30 AM EST
The FBI pored over Jeffrey Epstein’s bank records and emails. It searched his homes. It spent years interviewing his victims and examining his connections to some of the world’s most influential people.
But while investigators collected ample proof that Epstein sexually abused underage girls, they found scant evidence the well-connected financier led a sex trafficking ring serving powerful men, an Associated Press review of internal Justice Department records shows.
Videos and photos seized from Epstein’s homes in New York, Florida and the Virgin Islands didn’t depict victims being abused or implicate anyone else in his crimes, a prosecutor wrote in one 2025 memo.
An examination of Epstein’s financial records, including payments he made to entities linked to influential figures in academia, finance and global diplomacy, found no connection to criminal activity, said another internal memo in 2019.
While one Epstein victim made highly public claims that he “lent her” to his rich friends, agents couldn’t confirm that and found no other victims telling a similar story, the records said.
Summarizing the investigation in an email last July, agents said “four or five” Epstein accusers claimed other men or women had sexually abused them. But, the agents said, there “was not enough evidence to federally charge these individuals, so the cases were referred to local law enforcement.”
The AP and other media organizations are still reviewing millions of pages of documents, many of them previously confidential, that the Justice Department released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act and it is possible those records contain evidence overlooked by investigators. But the documents, which include police reports, FBI interview notes and prosecutor emails, provide the clearest picture to date of the investigation — and why U.S. authorities ultimately decided to close it without additional charges.
LINK
FBI concluded Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t running a sex trafficking ring for powerful men, files show
Sun, February 8, 2026 at 10:30 AM EST
The FBI pored over Jeffrey Epstein’s bank records and emails. It searched his homes. It spent years interviewing his victims and examining his connections to some of the world’s most influential people.
But while investigators collected ample proof that Epstein sexually abused underage girls, they found scant evidence the well-connected financier led a sex trafficking ring serving powerful men, an Associated Press review of internal Justice Department records shows.
Videos and photos seized from Epstein’s homes in New York, Florida and the Virgin Islands didn’t depict victims being abused or implicate anyone else in his crimes, a prosecutor wrote in one 2025 memo.
An examination of Epstein’s financial records, including payments he made to entities linked to influential figures in academia, finance and global diplomacy, found no connection to criminal activity, said another internal memo in 2019.
While one Epstein victim made highly public claims that he “lent her” to his rich friends, agents couldn’t confirm that and found no other victims telling a similar story, the records said.
Summarizing the investigation in an email last July, agents said “four or five” Epstein accusers claimed other men or women had sexually abused them. But, the agents said, there “was not enough evidence to federally charge these individuals, so the cases were referred to local law enforcement.”
The AP and other media organizations are still reviewing millions of pages of documents, many of them previously confidential, that the Justice Department released under the Epstein Files Transparency Act and it is possible those records contain evidence overlooked by investigators. But the documents, which include police reports, FBI interview notes and prosecutor emails, provide the clearest picture to date of the investigation — and why U.S. authorities ultimately decided to close it without additional charges.
This post was edited on 2/8/26 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:47 pm to Eurocat
So, he was murdered but innocent.
Interdasting.
Interdasting.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:49 pm to Eurocat
What about witnesses testimony?
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:50 pm to Shreve Perry
quote:
So, he was murdered but innocent.
Who said he was innocent?
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:50 pm to Pepe Lepew
quote:
What about witnesses testimony?
Over two criminal prosecutions and dozens of civil lawsuits, none of this emerged to describe a large scale operation of JE running girls to a network of rich men.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:52 pm to Eurocat
Yeah man, the FBI is a bastion of honesty.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
The Epstein bros are never going to accept this
Posted on 2/8/26 at 2:56 pm to Eurocat
I like how this is announced right before the supposed Epstein victim Super Bowl commercial tonight. Trump really wants to sweep this under the rug… BAD
Posted on 2/8/26 at 3:02 pm to Eurocat
I think it’s possible that the FBI couldn’t put hands on enough evidence to connect dots and charge the most likely targets.
For example, Dubin, despite all the smoke
But i also think it’s entirely possible the FBI intentionally didn’t turn over every stone, both because of the people involved/cabal/whatever and because they’re not in the business of taking big swings and missing (esp against people with lots of defense resources)
For example, Dubin, despite all the smoke
But i also think it’s entirely possible the FBI intentionally didn’t turn over every stone, both because of the people involved/cabal/whatever and because they’re not in the business of taking big swings and missing (esp against people with lots of defense resources)
Posted on 2/8/26 at 3:05 pm to Eurocat
You mean to tell me that I can’t trust people that said he sold abducted children on Wayfair?


Posted on 2/8/26 at 3:09 pm to Figgy
quote:
You mean to tell me that I can’t trust people that said he sold abducted children on Wayfair?
Uh, hello...Waifair? I ordered the Cask of Armandocito in irovy, not mahogany. What do I do with this brown kid?
Posted on 2/8/26 at 3:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Who said he was innocent?
Definitely not Bondi and internet influencers. They had the evidence for a photo op to prove it.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 3:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Who said he was innocent?
Definitely not Bondi and internet influencers. They had the evidence for a photo op to prove it.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 3:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Who said he was innocent?
Same guy that just said he was murdered.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 3:14 pm to LCA131
quote:
Same guy that just said he was murdered.
You mean the poster (who has it wrong) or the FBI official (who didn't say JE was innocent)?
Posted on 2/8/26 at 3:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Uh, hello...Waifair? I ordered the Cask of Armandocito in irovy, not mahogany. What do I do with this brown kid?
Nah, it’s got the same name as a kid that was previously lost, now found, so it’s obviously a scheme to smuggle children because who would buy an $8,000 pillow.
Posted on 2/8/26 at 3:20 pm to Eurocat
Right right right.
I definitely trust that conclusion
I definitely trust that conclusion
Posted on 2/8/26 at 3:20 pm to Shreve Perry
quote:That was such a stupid frick up and one of the many reasons Bondi should have resigned months ago.
Definitely not Bondi and internet influencers. They had the evidence for a photo op to prove it.
Popular
Back to top

17










