- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Could a presidential candidate win on a platform of a "Balanced Budget" ?
Posted on 2/4/26 at 11:59 pm
Posted on 2/4/26 at 11:59 pm
Secondary Question: Could a presidential candidate win on a platform of reforming Social Security?
If the answer to both of those questions is "No", then it makes me question the future greatly.
If the answer to both of those questions is "No", then it makes me question the future greatly.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 12:34 am to Rankest
not if they spell out what must be done to achieve either
Posted on 2/5/26 at 12:43 am to Rankest
Cutting freeloaders weekly SNAP junk food haul never won anyone any votes.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 3:44 am to Rankest
Impossible in today’s political climate
Posted on 2/5/26 at 3:46 am to Rankest
It would be an empty campaign promise because the president has no power to balance the budget.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 5:43 am to Rankest
No because people want government programs. You have to promise new spending to get votes. No one is serious about a balanced budget.
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 6:27 am
Posted on 2/5/26 at 5:46 am to Rankest
quote:Sure.
Could a presidential candidate win on a platform of a "Balanced Budget" ?
Could a POTUS execute that promise? Nope. It's a Legislative Branch issue.
Same with SS.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:07 am to RohanGonzales
quote:
not if they spell out what must be done to achieve either
That is the correct answer.
Everyone is in favor of the concept of balancing the budget, but not the reality of it meaning cuts to programs they benefit from. Just to balance last year's budget (October 2024 - October 2025), spending would have had to have been cut by ~30% (assuming debt is fully serviced).
Spread evenly, that's nearly 1/3rd of spending cut to everything - Medicare, pay for the military, SNAP, water bills at federal offices, toner, VA staff, etc. If cuts are more targeted then those items which are cut face even larger cuts. The larger and/or the more items cut, the bigger the outcry. The bigger the outcry, the more DC will cave on following through.
As many here have said many times over the years, this has only one mathematical outcome and it's not a good one.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:18 am to Rankest
They could potentially win sure. But most of what they ran on will never come to fruition. Neither party will allow this.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 6:55 am to 615tider
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. bukekle said, the money is enough when nobody steals. maybe could run if there wasn't so much graft and theft.This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 6:57 am
Posted on 2/5/26 at 7:01 am to Rankest
We're nearly $40 trillion in debt and have open Marxists surging in popularity country wide who advocate opening the borders to millions of foreigners to add to the welfare system.
If you are arguing about a "balanced budget" being the top campaign concern, you aren't seeing the forest for the trees.
If you are arguing about a "balanced budget" being the top campaign concern, you aren't seeing the forest for the trees.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 7:04 am to Rankest
There are a lot of things that should be considered for reduction or reform before SS is messed with. No one has HUD assistance or EBT withheld from their paychecks. All of the "freebies" should go before the forced contribution items, SS and MediCare.
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 7:08 am
Posted on 2/5/26 at 7:27 am to Rankest
I think a platform of cutting the budget by eliminating the theft of our tax dollars and eliminating the income tax would be interesting. It would have to be another outsider running though.
There are tons of examples of theft of our tax dollars recently: Somali daycares, LA county hospice care centers, USAID corruption.
What party is fighting investigations funding paid protesters to create diversions.
There are tons of examples of theft of our tax dollars recently: Somali daycares, LA county hospice care centers, USAID corruption.
What party is fighting investigations funding paid protesters to create diversions.
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 7:36 am
Posted on 2/5/26 at 8:45 am to Rankest
No, because the President doesn’t control the budget
Posted on 2/5/26 at 8:48 am to Bard
quote:
Everyone is in favor of the concept of balancing the budget, but not the reality of it meaning cuts to programs they benefit from.
As I’ve long said and has been proven since DOGE, the budget would be balanced with programs intact if you just got rid of fraud, waste, and abuse.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:12 am to TrueTiger
quote:
It would be an empty campaign promise because the president has no power to balance the budget.
No, but he could refuse to sign it, making Congress come up with a veto-proof majority. Unfortunately, that would probably mean that they'd spend even more to appease everyone.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:48 am to Rankest
quote:
Could a presidential candidate win on a platform of a "Balanced Budget" ?
Don't know. But, would win my vote. as Elon has noted, the gulf between what we revenue (4.9T) and what we spend (6.9T) is likely 2T in fraud.
what would a message sound like if a candidate with a pair said "I will balance the budget simply by eliminating fraud"
Posted on 2/5/26 at 9:49 am to Rankest
Cut all the libtards off the gubment tit and then we'll talk.
Posted on 2/5/26 at 10:10 am to Rankest
quote:Voters love spending on themselves, want others cut. Problem is, damn near everyone gets SS. So no realistic proposal will be popular.
Could a presidential candidate win on a platform of a "Balanced Budget" ?
quote:GWB tried it. It’s how we got a Pelosi led Congress if that tells you anything.
Secondary Question: Could a presidential candidate win on a platform of reforming Social Security?
quote:No reason to question it. Our fate is already sealed. Instead… prepare.
If the answer to both of those questions is "No", then it makes me question the future greatly.
This post was edited on 2/5/26 at 10:11 am
Popular
Back to top

18










