- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Exxon begins commercial CCS project with CF industries in Louisiana
Posted on 1/28/26 at 10:26 am
Posted on 1/28/26 at 10:26 am
quote:
Jan 26 (Reuters) - Exxon Mobil said on Monday it has begun its commercial operation of carbon capture and storage, or CCS, with ammonia producer CF Industries in Louisiana, starting in 2025.
The project will transport and store up to 2 million tonnes a year (MTPA) of carbon dioxide from CF Industries' Donaldsonville complex, the company said.
Carbon capture is a process through which carbon dioxide (CO2) generated from industrial activity is stored underground. The process has been embraced by oil companies including Chevron, Occidental Petroleum and Talos Energy.
The energy major has also signed agreements with AtmosClear and Lake Charles Methanol II to handle up to a combined 2 MTPA of CO2 from their planned projects in Louisiana. Additionally, it expects to start CCS operations with Linde and Nucor later this year.
Exxon plans to advance multiple CCS developments across Texas and Louisiana and is targeting a final investment decision on its first low-carbon data center by the end of 2026.
LINK
Posted on 1/28/26 at 10:28 am to ragincajun03
quote:
Exxon plans to advance multiple CCS developments across Texas and Louisiana and is targeting a final investment decision on its first low-carbon data center by the end of 2026.
Is this for their own use?
Posted on 1/28/26 at 10:29 am to ragincajun03
I thought Trump made libtarbon democrapture illegal
Posted on 1/28/26 at 10:37 am to ragincajun03
What do they do with it after they store it?
Posted on 1/28/26 at 10:39 am to Tifway419
Probably depends on what the tax credit allows them to do. Some credits have a rule that it must stay stored “forever”/100 years.
Other credits will still allow you to pull it out later to use for secondary oil & gas recovery.
Other credits will still allow you to pull it out later to use for secondary oil & gas recovery.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 10:39 am to Tifway419
Cash a yuge check of your tax dollars.
Thanks bro!
Thanks bro!
This post was edited on 1/28/26 at 10:40 am
Posted on 1/28/26 at 11:07 am to ragincajun03
We're fighting something similar in North La. A group of local investors was organized to bring in a "biomass" (read: thinnings from logging) powered electrical plant and the resulting CO2 would be injected under the Wilcox formation (there was supposed to be a "green" jetfuel company involved in that as well, but I've heard reports it may have pulled out).
While the local investors are promoting this as jobs, they are failing to mention that without the 45Q tax credits for the sequestration part, the whole thing fails to draw enough profits to run.
What they also fail to mention is the liability aspect. There's a $500k cap on damages per event. If the injection fails, let's say it seeps up through fractures and coalesces into a bubble that blows out a hole near someone's home... that homeowner can't get more than $500k from the company for their damages. If there are 10 homes around the hole, they split $500k.
Fifty years after the last bit of CO2 goes into the ground, the state takes over maintenance and monitoring of the wells but the property owners are responsible for damages which may happen from the CO2 seeping back up. And yes, leaks can happen.
Where I'm at odds the most on this is that the project hasn't even started yet and there has already been legislation passed (seemingly despite Article I, Section 4 and Article 4, Section 21) to allow the Commissioner of Conservation at DNR (or whatever they renamed themselves) to be the sole determiner for what properties can be expropriated for CCS projects. There's currently a case that should be going before the state supreme court before long to settle this part one way or another.
While the local investors are promoting this as jobs, they are failing to mention that without the 45Q tax credits for the sequestration part, the whole thing fails to draw enough profits to run.
What they also fail to mention is the liability aspect. There's a $500k cap on damages per event. If the injection fails, let's say it seeps up through fractures and coalesces into a bubble that blows out a hole near someone's home... that homeowner can't get more than $500k from the company for their damages. If there are 10 homes around the hole, they split $500k.
Fifty years after the last bit of CO2 goes into the ground, the state takes over maintenance and monitoring of the wells but the property owners are responsible for damages which may happen from the CO2 seeping back up. And yes, leaks can happen.
Where I'm at odds the most on this is that the project hasn't even started yet and there has already been legislation passed (seemingly despite Article I, Section 4 and Article 4, Section 21) to allow the Commissioner of Conservation at DNR (or whatever they renamed themselves) to be the sole determiner for what properties can be expropriated for CCS projects. There's currently a case that should be going before the state supreme court before long to settle this part one way or another.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 11:24 am to Bard
The stainless steel involved must be crazy
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:18 pm to ThatTahoeOverThere
Probably sub all the material and fab to asia or india.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:24 pm to ragincajun03
My company won a contract just this week for a CCS project in Denmark that will happen in Q2 of this year. This will be my first time being involved with a CCS project. Should be interesting to see how it’s executed compared to a GT or O&G project. They have a pretty extensive coring program planned for one.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:28 pm to redstick13
quote:
CCS project in Denmark
Gonna move it to Greenland when we acquire it.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:38 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
Gonna move it to Greenland when we acquire it.
Sounds like a good opportunity to expand my market.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:42 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
carbon capture
fricking galactically stupid.
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:44 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
secondary oil & gas recovery.
Let’s not kid ourselves, this is why it’s done. Using CO2 instead of water for fracking
Posted on 1/28/26 at 1:52 pm to SECCaptain
quote:
Using CO2 instead of water for fracking
Umm…I’ll go ask one of our completions engineers if he can try to frack one of our upcoming horizontals with CO2.
This post was edited on 1/28/26 at 1:59 pm
Popular
Back to top
6









