- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
U of Texas athletic department reports loss of $23 million in 2025
Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:09 am
Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:09 am
quote:
The Texas athletic department reported a loss of roughly $23.3 million in the 2025 fiscal year, an outcome that university officials say they planned for amid the school’s move from the Big 12 to the SEC.
The Longhorns broke their own record for spending by one institution in a fiscal cycle, reporting nearly $376 million in expenses, according to documents obtained by the American-Statesman. The athletic department generated nearly $353 million in revenue, a total that topped last year’s reported revenue by about $21 million. The athletic department concluded fiscal year 2025 in a deficit because it did not receive a full share of revenue distribution from the SEC, according to Texas Chief Financial Officer Rob Novak.
That’s a result of an agreement Texas and Oklahoma struck with the SEC to join the league in 2024, a year earlier than originally planned.
Because of that, Novak said, Texas budgeted to make a loss of $47 million in 2025, and considers the $26 million it lost to be a positive outcome relative to its own expectations.
quote:
Novak told the Statesman last January that he expected Texas to make a loss in the 2025 fiscal year. In the past three fiscal cycles, Texas banked a surplus of over $46 million to prepare its reserves for 2025. Novak said the athletic department still has over $30 million in reserve after its 2025 losses.
“It’s not Whack-A-Mole to balance a budget,” Novak said. “It’s, ‘What does this look like long-term? If we agree to do this today, can we sustain it? And if we can, what does that mean for revenue? Are the donors going to keep investing through donations? Is there going to be a market to increase ticket prices?’”
This year’s deficit was further complicated by the loss of revenue from the Longhorn Network, which handed over the rights to live events to ESPN following Texas’ move to the SEC.
LINK
Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:20 am to ragincajun03
quote:
exas budgeted to make a loss of $47 million in 2025, and considers the $26 million it lost to be a positive outcome
lol
Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:23 am to ragincajun03
Wont even make a dent in that oil money. They can do this forever.
This post was edited on 1/22/26 at 8:24 am
Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:24 am to ragincajun03
This actually seems like relatively smart fiscal planning.
They even ran a surplus damn near to their projections for several years to cover this then beat their projections and get to keep that remaining surplus.
This isn’t a story.
They even ran a surplus damn near to their projections for several years to cover this then beat their projections and get to keep that remaining surplus.
This isn’t a story.
This post was edited on 1/22/26 at 8:25 am
Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:27 am to sgallo3
quote:
Wont even make a dent in that oil money. They can do this forever.
Yep. The revenues the UT system generates from University Lands in West TX is incredible.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:42 am to ragincajun03
So they're leasing Univ land grants for drilling?
Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:42 am to ragincajun03
ITT - People, and a reporter, that have no clue how to interpret a P&L
Posted on 1/22/26 at 9:45 am to ragincajun03
The story of the PUF is funny
They got allocated a bunch of land in 1876. Then
The state and railroads hand them millions of acres of “worthless land” a decade before an oil boom that continues to today.
They got allocated a bunch of land in 1876. Then
quote:
1883, Texas and Pacific Railroad returned 1 million acres (4,000 km2), deemed too worthless to survey, to the State Government, which turned the land over to the PUF.[4] Initially, the little revenue PUF earned from its lands were from grazing leases.[5] The terms of the annexation of the Republic of Texas in 1845 meant that Texas kept its public lands.[3] The 1894 discovery of oil in Corsicana, Texas and the 1901 discovery of oil at Spindletop in Beaumont, Texas, began a subsequent oil boom in Texas and the western U.S
The state and railroads hand them millions of acres of “worthless land” a decade before an oil boom that continues to today.
This post was edited on 1/22/26 at 9:52 am
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:12 am to jlovel7
quote:
This actually seems like relatively smart fiscal planning. They even ran a surplus damn near to their projections for several years to cover this then beat their projections and get to keep that remaining surplus. This isn’t a story.
It is a story if you have poor reading comprehension
Posted on 1/22/26 at 10:15 am to Adam Banks
quote:
1883, Texas and Pacific Railroad returned 1 million acres (4,000 km2), deemed too worthless to survey, to the State Government
Meanwhile, T&P RR still retained about 3 million acres, which was put into a trust upon bankruptcy, later became Texas Pacific Land Trust. They’re now a public traded land holding company, bringing in hundreds of million per year in O&G royalties, surface damages, and water services income.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 11:55 am to ragincajun03
Damn lost on the field.
Damn lost off the field.
Damn lost off the field.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 12:08 pm to ragincajun03
They are always listed as the most valuable program
Posted on 1/22/26 at 1:12 pm to ragincajun03
Texas schools are the closest thing to LIV golf that exist in college football. They'll take financial losses all day to maintain status.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 1:42 pm to jlovel7
quote:
This actually seems like relatively smart fiscal planning.
If only Congress could do something like this
Posted on 1/22/26 at 3:00 pm to The Pirate King
Do you have any evidence of for this nonsense or is it just something your spouting off about
Posted on 1/22/26 at 3:06 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
Do you have any evidence of for this nonsense or is it just something your spouting off about
Sorry I assumed it was understood I was talking about UT, TTU, and A&M and not Rice.
And it's the closest to LIV golf because all three are desperately trying to buy relevance and a championship through recruiting and have the near endless funds from oil money to make it happen, much like the Saudis and LIV.
Posted on 1/22/26 at 3:12 pm to The Pirate King
Again other than just spouting off things that you think show me where there's a history of tech for example spending ungodly amounts of money
And where's the proof that Texas or A&M or Baylor or even SMU spends more than Ohio State or Michigan or Alabama or Penn State or LSU
the private donors might spend more that's their business but show me where the university system is actually spending so much more than any other
other than a short-term spike
And where's the proof that Texas or A&M or Baylor or even SMU spends more than Ohio State or Michigan or Alabama or Penn State or LSU
the private donors might spend more that's their business but show me where the university system is actually spending so much more than any other
other than a short-term spike
This post was edited on 1/22/26 at 3:36 pm
Popular
Back to top

9








