- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Here is a good article about a Wisconsin player that left for Miami and was sued...
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:31 pm
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:31 pm
Looks like Washington could be SOL...
LINK
Does anyone know what the settlement concluded about these deals?
LINK
quote:
Wisconsin defensive back Xavier Lucas is at the center of a major impending legal battle after his lawyer, Darren Heitner, announced that he would transfer to Miami. At issue is whether revenue-sharing agreements with schools are binding in the wake of the upcoming House v. NCAA lawsuit settlement.
The saga began when Lucas asked Wisconsin to enter his name into the transfer portal after one season with the school. Wisconsin denied his request, claiming the two-year revenue-sharing agreement he signed on Dec. 2 is binding. He additionally signed a separate deal with Wisconsin's NIL collective.
NCAA bylaws mandate that universities must enter players into the transfer portal within two business days of a request.
quote:
2025 marks the first year schools can sign revenue-sharing contracts with players and directly pay them for their services. However, the contracts are not technically allowed until the House settlement reaches final approval. The final hearing will take place on April 7, 2025. According to Heitner, the contract Lucas signed is only a memorandum of understanding and isn't enforceable until the settlement is finalized.
Lucas's representation claims that after he was denied the right to enter the transfer portal, he unenrolled from the university. At that point, he claims that he connected with Miami and signed with the school. Wisconsin also claims it has evidence that Miami tampered with Lucas before he entered the portal.
Does anyone know what the settlement concluded about these deals?
This post was edited on 1/6/26 at 9:42 pm
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:32 pm to Chicken
We getting this guy Chicken or is Miami bidding higher than LSU?
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:33 pm to Chicken
Plz summarize for the dummies
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:33 pm to Chicken
So yeah. They aren’t employees and the items they signed are not in affect nor have they been compensated.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:34 pm to Chicken
So if he had an agent that did contacting…?
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:34 pm to DalenSA
quote:
Plz summarize for the dummies
Washington fricked, LSU back.
LSU in driver’s seat.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:35 pm to DalenSA
Seems like it’s just a “we (insert college) pay you x amount and you play for us”
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:35 pm to Chicken
quote:
According to Heitner, the contract Lucas signed is only a memorandum of understanding and isn't enforceable until the settlement is finalized.
This will be the interesting part with this case. Did he sign an MOU or the actual contract? I still think either way this isn't going anywhere for Washington.
What are they going to do? File an injunction to prevent him from playing for LSU?
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:37 pm to Chicken
I don’t think Williams would re-enter the portal without doing his homework. I’m sure his agent has contacted lawyers and got advise on how to do this.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:39 pm to Chicken
So basically no deal right now is binding with revenue sharing deals? Open season!
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:39 pm to DalenSA
quote:
DalenSA
Plz summarize for the dummies
Scholarships are meaningless with NIL.
Student athletes are not employees of the university.
The school nor NCAA can stop them from simply unenrolling from one school and enrolling in another.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:40 pm to DeathvalleyU
This. Like wtf is this sport now? I’m sorry but this shite sucks arse
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:41 pm to Chicken
Grok says:
However…
quote:
No, NCAA athletes generally cannot unilaterally “break” a revenue sharing agreement in the sense of terminating it without consequences, but the structure isn’t a traditional long-term binding contract that locks them in.
However…
quote:
In practice:
• If an athlete wants to “break” the arrangement (e.g., due to dissatisfaction with pay or playing time), their main option is to transfer, which effectively ends the revenue sharing with that school.
• There are no widespread reports of revenue sharing being enforced as unbreakable multi-year contracts that prevent leaving or require repayment.
• Schools control distribution, so payments can be performance-based, merit-based, or equitable, but athletes aren’t bound to stay if unhappy. This system prioritizes school flexibility while giving athletes mobility through transfers, rather than creating ironclad player contracts. As of early 2026, the model is still evolving, with ongoing oversight by the NCAA and potential future adjustments.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:42 pm to WestSideTiger
quote:
There are no widespread reports of revenue sharing being enforced as unbreakable multi-year contracts that prevent leaving
This is the clause that makes me feel good. Thanks for posting that.
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:43 pm to Chicken
With the revenue sharing set up now, the case would be totally different. Williams would be an employee paid by the University of Washington, at least for a portion of his deal
Posted on 1/6/26 at 9:43 pm to SWLA92
Great point if the dude is pulling this type of cash someone advised him this is okay. He didn’t pull this out of his arse without running it by someone
Posted on 1/6/26 at 10:40 pm to DalenSA
quote:Williams can leave Washington if he wants...
Plz summarize for the dummies
Popular
Back to top

11








