- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
These people could still be dangerous but we are releasing them from prison anyway
Posted on 12/31/25 at 11:32 am
Posted on 12/31/25 at 11:32 am
That is the entire concept behind sex offender registries.
The idea originated in California and expanded as released convicts committed more crimes.
So, why release them if they could still be dangerous?
Find offenders near you
The idea originated in California and expanded as released convicts committed more crimes.
So, why release them if they could still be dangerous?
Find offenders near you
6
Posted on 12/31/25 at 11:40 am to weagle1999
quote:
So, why release them if they could still be dangerous?
Prisons are crowded and it costs too much to house them there, maybe that Orange guy is onto something offshoring out prisoners to El Salvador prisons.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 11:41 am to weagle1999
Hmm...my next door neighbor got arrested for growing weed in his backyard.
Guess my property line isn't where I thought it was...
Guess my property line isn't where I thought it was...
Posted on 12/31/25 at 11:50 am to weagle1999
I never liked the idea of the registration. If you served your time that should be it, done. If you’re still dangerous then you shouldn’t be out. Same for felons and not being able to vote and employers being able to look them up to deny jobs.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 11:58 am to weagle1999
Our government fails us whenever we are a victim of a crime where we would be justified to use lethal force to defend ourselves, but for whatever reason, we are unable to. We all too often can have 100% indisputable proof and they often do short prison sentences and/or are released. These criminals, when caught and convicted, should be put to death.
Now, when there is a shadow of doubt, say less than 95% certainty, they should be forced to perform hard manual labor for the rest of their lives.
Now, when there is a shadow of doubt, say less than 95% certainty, they should be forced to perform hard manual labor for the rest of their lives.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:04 pm to Woolfpack
Build more alligator alcatrazes.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:08 pm to bad93ex
quote:
and it costs too much to house them there
Araipo had the right solution. Tent city b*tches.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:08 pm to weagle1999
“We” are releasing them? Not I
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:11 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
never liked the idea of the registration
I don't hate it. What I hate is the extremely onerous penalties for a first offense violation.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:24 pm to weagle1999
People like having a villain class. It can be the commies, or the Jews, or the homos, Jazz musicians, or whatever.
I do think that vilifying kid-diddling perverts is more justifiable than throwing a whole race under the bus. IDK about religion... the distinction there is less clear to me. If you worship 94 different gods and they're all weird monstrous creatures, or if you name your god "Satan" because the other guys think he's bad, then IMO you've got it coming- maybe not to the extent a pedophile does, but don't expect the rest of us to just accept that.
Similar with sexual orientation. Claiming you're married to another man might not be as bad as being a pedophile, but it's not right, either.
When you accept all the other stuff as normal, I guess you're left vilifying pedophiles- because there has to be a villain or the normies will get restless.
I do think that vilifying kid-diddling perverts is more justifiable than throwing a whole race under the bus. IDK about religion... the distinction there is less clear to me. If you worship 94 different gods and they're all weird monstrous creatures, or if you name your god "Satan" because the other guys think he's bad, then IMO you've got it coming- maybe not to the extent a pedophile does, but don't expect the rest of us to just accept that.
Similar with sexual orientation. Claiming you're married to another man might not be as bad as being a pedophile, but it's not right, either.
When you accept all the other stuff as normal, I guess you're left vilifying pedophiles- because there has to be a villain or the normies will get restless.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:39 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
I never liked the idea of the registration. If you served your time that should be it, done. If you’re still dangerous then you shouldn’t be out. .
So how does this work? Sorry Mr Pedophile you served your sentence but we "think" you're going do it again so w'e're going to keep you a little longer to make sure? I'm sure that system would work well.
quote:
Same for felons and not being able to vote and employers being able to look them up to deny jobs
This is part of the punishment for the crime in addition to the time in prison. Don't want these to happen to you then don't commit the crimes in the first place.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 12:56 pm to armytiger96
The punishments aren’t severe enough.
Castration and female circumcision should be on the table as punishment options available to juries.
Castration and female circumcision should be on the table as punishment options available to juries.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 1:26 pm to bad93ex
quote:
Prisons are crowded and it costs too much to house them there, maybe that Orange guy is onto something offshoring out prisoners to El Salvador prisons.
But if we ship all the criminals out, who’ll serve as president?
Posted on 12/31/25 at 1:33 pm to armytiger96
They can serve all their time and still not be released due to them being considered too likely to reoffend by psychology and the courts. I used to work in a prison that had a whole unit full of them. Here it is broke down...
Civil commitment of sexually violent predators (SVPs) is a legal process allowing states to indefinitely confine individuals who, after serving their criminal sentences for sex offenses, are deemed by a court to have a mental abnormality or personality disorder making them highly likely to re-offend, thus posing a danger to public safety. It's a non-punitive, civil psychiatric confinement separate from criminal incarceration, occurring in secure facilities, and often lasting years or indefinitely until treatment proves they are no longer a risk.
Civil commitment of sexually violent predators (SVPs) is a legal process allowing states to indefinitely confine individuals who, after serving their criminal sentences for sex offenses, are deemed by a court to have a mental abnormality or personality disorder making them highly likely to re-offend, thus posing a danger to public safety. It's a non-punitive, civil psychiatric confinement separate from criminal incarceration, occurring in secure facilities, and often lasting years or indefinitely until treatment proves they are no longer a risk.
Posted on 12/31/25 at 2:08 pm to holdmuh keystonelite
quote:
Civil commitment of sexually violent predators (SVPs) is a legal process allowing states to indefinitely confine individuals who, after serving their criminal sentences for sex offenses, are deemed by a court to have a mental abnormality or personality disorder making them highly likely to re-offend, thus posing a danger to public safety. It's a non-punitive, civil psychiatric confinement separate from criminal incarceration, occurring in secure facilities, and often lasting years or indefinitely until treatment proves they are no longer a risk.
I have no problem with this.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News