Started By
Message

NFL tells Panthers a seemingly obvious incompletion was actually a catch

Posted on 12/17/25 at 10:21 am
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
146457 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 10:21 am
This was the play where, late in the game, McMillan was diving to try & make the catch, had 2 hands on the ball, then, as he hit the ground, the hand on the bottom side of the ball came off allowing the ball to hit the ground

It was ruled a catch, Saints challenged & won, overruling it to incomplete

Now the NFL tells the Panthers it should've been confirmed as a completed pass...

Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
78786 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 10:29 am to
The nfl doesn’t know what a catch is
Posted by ShrevetownTiger
Shreveport
Member since Jan 2007
3169 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 10:40 am to
To be fair, if I were a ref in that game, I'd rule it as a catch. Hell, it was impressive he held on to the ball and it didn't move.

Edited to say, when we challenged the call, I thought maybe he didn't get two feet in.
This post was edited on 12/17/25 at 10:42 am
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
15885 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 10:41 am to
Yet still no accountability for the Refs. Not fines, no suspensions.

Just oh sorry.

Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
146457 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Yet still no accountability for the Refs. Not fines, no suspensions.

Just oh sorry.

To be fair... the referee of this game is a 1st year referee... replacing a referee who was demoted back to umpire for poor performance
Posted by gaetti15
AK
Member since Apr 2013
14791 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 10:46 am to
quote:

The nfl doesn’t know what a catch is


Will be like this until I die
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
20797 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 10:48 am to
quote:

To be fair... the referee of this game is a 1st year referee... replacing a referee who was demoted back to umpire for poor performance

Had not clicked the article that I am sure is citing anonymous sources, but I wonder who made the call to overturn the play. The officials on the field ruled it a catch, I thought it was a catch because the ball never moved once he secured it, and it was overturned during the review. The league changed the handling of the reviews to include New York, and the official stance is that any reviews are performed collaboratively between the officials in NY and the officials on the field.
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
54081 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 10:49 am to
I wonder if the Saints would have been told the same thing
It was not a catch
Posted by Ice Cold
Over Macho Grande
Member since Jun 2004
18884 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 10:55 am to
quote:

he held on to the ball and it didn't move.
Because his hand was atop the ball, which was on the ground. The fact that his bottom hand moved but top did not, while the ball slid across the turf, to me is clear evidence of a non-catch.

You can't say he had control when that control was because the ball was on the ground.
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
13885 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 11:13 am to
I still don’t think that was a catch. He held control because the ball was going across the turf.
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
8753 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 11:13 am to
He basically trapped it. The ball hit the ground and he had one hand on top of the ball and then the ball moved. It was clearly not a catch
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
176223 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 11:13 am to
quote:

and then the ball moved.


yep. nfl can suck a big coke can.
Posted by BigTigerJoe
Member since Aug 2022
11389 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 11:29 am to
These things rarely go the Saints way. Once in a blue moon, the NFL makes a big deal about it.

No one cares or it gets reported when the Saints get screwed.

The Panthers won the division against the Saints with a poorly called game years ago.

The ref allowed 12 men in the huddle for the Panthers over and over again in the Dome.

The lead ref is from North Carolina operating a business there and went to school in North Carolina.

Brad Allen was the ref. Payton pointed out the conflict of interest and controversial call keeping the Panthers drive alive to win the game.

frick the Panthers. They tried to injure Shough.
Posted by TooFyeToFly
Atlanta, Georgia
Member since Nov 2012
2083 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Yet still no accountability for the Refs. Not fines, no suspensions.


When you mess up at work do you get fined?
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
15885 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 11:35 am to
quote:

When you mess up at work do you get fined?


When I did work, Yes you would get docked pay and if it happened routinely you would be fired.

Accountability.

The companies didn't owe us a job like most seem to think they do these days. Which IMO is was quality has gone to shite in the last few decades. No one cares because they're going to get paid anyway.
Posted by Bayou
Boudin, LA
Member since Feb 2005
41618 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 11:46 am to
quote:

To be fair... the referee of this game is a 1st year referee...

Does not compute?
So his lack of overall experience makes it fair?
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
146457 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

Does not compute?
So his lack of overall experience makes it fair?


No... I was pointing out that an official had been demoted due to poor performance (Tra Blake was a referee last year... demoted to umpire this year)

Since the post I was responding to said "nothing would happen" to an official who misses calls

To add to it... this officiating crew also has some iffy marks this year
Posted by saintsfan1977
Arkansas, from Cajun country
Member since Jun 2010
9948 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

Yet still no accountability for the Refs. Not fines, no suspensions.

Just oh sorry.

This is how they control the game.
Posted by holdem Tiger
Member since Oct 2007
1226 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 12:53 pm to
It wasn't close to a catch and I doubt the NFL "admitted" anything to the Panthers.
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
7468 posts
Posted on 12/17/25 at 1:24 pm to
It wasn’t an obvious incompletion. It was an obvious legitimate catch. When they reviewed and ruled it incomplete I was confused as to the logic used. Even the bozo retired referee rules guy chimed in and agreed it was incomplete. Wrong. It was a catch. There is no consistency from game to game from referee to referee as to what constitutes a catch.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram