- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Anybody know the status of CBK’s lawsuit with LSU?
Posted on 12/12/25 at 6:13 am
Posted on 12/12/25 at 6:13 am
Did it get dismissed after LSU formally terminated him without cause? Did LSU ever file a responsive pleading? Still can’t believe he filed that piece of shite. What an a-hole.
4
Posted on 12/12/25 at 6:20 am to T1gerNate
We gave him the money. Look at that as a settlement out of court.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 6:25 am to T1gerNate
His drunk arse better be applying for that Michigan job
Posted on 12/12/25 at 6:38 am to Tarpon08
We haven't given him any money except his monthly buyout check. LSU did agree he was terminated without cause. That should resolve the lawsuit, but not the total buyout. He still has to look for a job and LSU will get an offset against his buyout if he does.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 7:01 am to Tarpon08
quote:
We gave him the money
Curious…who is “we”?
Posted on 12/12/25 at 7:17 am to Crusty
quote:quote:
We gave him the money
Curious…who is “we”?
LSU, specifically the LSU athletic department. A fan will often, perhaps even typically, use the pronoun we when referring to the school or organization they are a fan of, but you knew that was what he meant.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 7:40 am to mdomingue
The fans make Tiger Stadium, so it is a we.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:16 am to T1gerNate
It was never a lawsuit. It was a motion for declaratory judgement. And it became moot after LSU stated it fired CBK without cause. That is what the purpose of the motion was for, to get clarity on if CBK was fired for cause ir not.
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:31 am to El Jefe de Tu Mama
quote:It was a lawsuit. Kelly's attorneys filed a Petition for Declaratory Judgment. You can't file a motion without a lawsuit.
It was never a lawsuit. It was a motion for declaratory judgement. And it became moot after LSU stated it fired CBK without cause. That is what the purpose of the motion was for, to get clarity on if CBK was fired for cause ir not.
I'm sure Kelly's attorneys will voluntarily dismiss it if they have not already.
This post was edited on 12/12/25 at 8:32 am
Posted on 12/12/25 at 8:49 am to T1gerNate
quote:
Did LSU ever file a responsive pleading?
BK's lawsuit was for a declarative judgement that he was not fired for cause... not specifically for money. A judgement in his favor would have just said we owe him the full payout. LSU BOS officially fired him without cause and hence rendered the lawsuit moot. He got the money
Posted on 12/12/25 at 9:47 am to Tarpon08
quote:And an NDA between parties so nobody's going to discuss the settlement.
We gave him the money. Look at that as a settlement out of court.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News