- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Federal judge orders Trump administration to end deployment of CA National Guard
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:02 am
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:02 am
LINK
Why do we even have a President or Congress at this point. Judges have more power, at least in their minds, than both
quote:
The Trump administration must stop deploying the California National Guard in Los Angeles and return control of the troops to the state, a federal judge ruled Wednesday.
U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco granted a preliminary injunction sought by California officials who opposed President Donald Trump's extraordinary move to use state Guard troops without the governor's approval to further his immigration enforcement efforts. But he also put the decision on hold until Monday.
California argued that conditions in Los Angeles had changed since Trump first took command of the troops and deployed them in June. The administration initially called up more than 4,000 California National Guard troops, but that number had dropped to several hundred by late October, with only a 100 or so troops remaining in the Los Angeles area.
Why do we even have a President or Congress at this point. Judges have more power, at least in their minds, than both
10
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:04 am to stout
Thank god there is no lawfare
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:09 am to Nosevens
Needs to be one response
FO1
FO1
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:09 am to stout
Uhh, no
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:12 am to Nosevens
quote:
Thank god there is no lawfare
Is what he's doing legal? I don't know the differences but I would think there are more legal hoops to jump through for a president to deploy a state's NG without their governor's consent as opposed to deploying a Reserve unit or active duty troops.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:23 am to stout
Stephen Breyer's brother.
Shocker.
He had already granted a TRO that the 9th slapped down.
Expect this one to receive a similar reception.
Shocker.
He had already granted a TRO that the 9th slapped down.
Expect this one to receive a similar reception.
This post was edited on 12/11/25 at 8:23 am
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:23 am to stout
remove the judge from the bench - feet first if necessary
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:36 am to stout
I honestly do not recall... were they officially federalized or were they under a 90 emergency order?
I, my opinion, agree with this particular ruling if he did it under an emergency order. Not only does it matter in terms of who's paying for what it is an extremely important guardrail.
If federalized, officially and properly, frick YOU black robe. Quit usurping the executive powers granted to the president by Congress.
I, my opinion, agree with this particular ruling if he did it under an emergency order. Not only does it matter in terms of who's paying for what it is an extremely important guardrail.
If federalized, officially and properly, frick YOU black robe. Quit usurping the executive powers granted to the president by Congress.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:44 am to stout
I order this judge to suck on deez nuts.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 8:50 am to stout
At what point did random federal judges become rulers of this country?
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:14 am to stout
Haven't they aleady tried this for LA before and it got shot down? These fricking judges need to start being arrested.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:15 am to stout
Already ruled on.
Ignored
Ignored
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:15 am to Flats
quote:
quote:
Thank god there is no lawfare
Is what he's doing legal?
JFC.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:19 am to BTROleMisser
quote:BTR is correct.
Thank god there is no lawfarequote:JFC
Is what he's doing legal?
It is ridiculous for Flats to ask whether a President is acting within the law.
Wait. What party is this President?
That's right, he belongs to OUR party, so it IS ridiculous to ask that question. It is only a reasonable question when a Dem sits in the Oval.
This post was edited on 12/11/25 at 10:20 am
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:22 am to stout
quote:
U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco
Has over-ruled the US Supreme Court.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:25 am to TDTOM
quote:Brilliant response.
STFU
You should consider a career in editorial journalism.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:26 am to Auburn1968
It's being ignored.
Relax
Relax
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:26 am to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Brilliant response.
You should consider a career in editorial journalism.
My point stands.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 10:49 am to Snipe
quote:
At what point did random federal judges become rulers of this country?
A lot of these federal judges give me the feeling they've been planted like mines laid out on a battlefield.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News