- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ron Paul, M.D. - The Hegseth Killings Must Stop.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:10 pm
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:10 pm
The GOAT has spoken.
LINK
quote:
Last week the Pentagon, under “War Secretary” Pete Hegseth, carried out yet another military attack on a boat in the high seas that the Administration claims is smuggling drugs. That makes 23 boats blown up by the US military in the waters off Latin America – most near Venezuela – and nearly 100 persons killed.
To date the US government has provided no evidence to back up its claim that these boats are smuggling fentanyl and other dangerous drugs into the United States. The US Drug Enforcement Administration has reported that Venezuela neither manufactures nor transports fentanyl to the US. In fact, the DEA still concludes that Venezuela is barely a minor player in the drug game.
Is this really about drugs? Or is it about “regime change” for Venezuela?
When Adm. Alvin Holsey, the commander of US Southern Command, raised concerns about the legality of bombing boats on the high seas and extrajudicial killing, he was pushed out by Hegseth. His concerns were ignored.
When lawyers at the National Security Council, Pentagon, and Justice Department raised objections to the boat attacks they were reassigned or fired, according to press reports. Finally, President Trump’s own appointed lawyers at the Justice Department came up with a justification for killings. But it’s classified.
Last week the media reported on an incident from September where two survivors of the US strike were left clinging to the wreckage of their boat when the orders came to kill them too. It was clearly an illegal order, even according to the Pentagon’s own Laws of War manual.
Many Americans will not want to hear this, but this entire operation is illegal and immoral – from blowing up survivors to blowing up the boats in the first place. There is no legal justification to use military force against boats on the high sea that pose no imminent military threat to the United States.
Many supporters of this policy argue that the killings are “self-defense” because “narco-terrorists” are using narcotics as weapons against the American people. That is certainly what the Administration is claiming, having invented “narco-terrorist” as a new term to justify the killings.
Sadly, this shows how effective government war propaganda still is. It was used when both Republican and Democratic Administrations wanted to launch wars against Saddam Hussein, against Gaddafi, against Assad, and so on. New slogans are invented and a good deal of the public happily adopts them as their own. Anyone who challenges the new slogans is deemed unpatriotic or weak. When the war goes badly they pretend they were never fooled by government lies. Then it happens again and they repeat the new war slogans.
The “war on drugs” was launched by President Nixon a half century ago. It is obviously another failed government policy. Raising the stakes in a failed war is foolish and counterproductive. The solution to smuggling during alcohol prohibition was not to start bombing the bootleggers. It was to come to terms with basic economics: you cannot kill demand by killing supply.
More Americans die each year from alcohol use than from fentanyl use. Will strikes soon be launched against “alco-terrorists” who are killing Americans? Of course not…we hope. That is the danger of throwing away the laws of war: anything can happen next.
Congress has the authority to stop Secretary Hegseth from killing people on the high seas. It should do so without delay.
LINK
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:11 pm to Bunk Moreland
Strong words from a man with a son taking millions annually from Maduro
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:14 pm to Bunk Moreland
I agree with him. Even if I think blowing up drug boats is good policy, it has to be done the right way. I am as concerned with Trump unilaterally blowing up drug boats as I was about the Obama Administration unilaterally enacting regime change in Libya and droning weddings. It's a slippery slope to allow the executive unilateral authority over what amounts to summary executions of individuals without due process, without Congressional approval, and only thinly justified by ever-changing press corps narratives.
If Trump wants to continue doing this, he needs Congress to approve the action via an expanded UAMF or via Congress issuing letters of Marque and Reprisal. There exist pathways to do this legally that Trump is ignoring. I don't like when Presidents get away with ignoring these pathways because it gets us closer and closer to Presidents labeling American citizens on American soil as "enemy combatants" or "drug runners" without evidence, without due process, and executing them via the touch of a button on an xbox controller in Langley.
If I were in Congress, I would likely vote in favor of an expanded AUMF to authorize Trump's actions (granted, only after the Trump Administration put forward some clear policy goals and evidence), but I would heavily criticize this Administration for taking action without bothering to seek out Congressional consent prior.
If Trump wants to continue doing this, he needs Congress to approve the action via an expanded UAMF or via Congress issuing letters of Marque and Reprisal. There exist pathways to do this legally that Trump is ignoring. I don't like when Presidents get away with ignoring these pathways because it gets us closer and closer to Presidents labeling American citizens on American soil as "enemy combatants" or "drug runners" without evidence, without due process, and executing them via the touch of a button on an xbox controller in Langley.
If I were in Congress, I would likely vote in favor of an expanded AUMF to authorize Trump's actions (granted, only after the Trump Administration put forward some clear policy goals and evidence), but I would heavily criticize this Administration for taking action without bothering to seek out Congressional consent prior.
This post was edited on 12/9/25 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:16 pm to Bunk Moreland
quote:
the US government has provided no evidence to back up its claim that these boats are smuggling fentanyl and other dangerous drugs
Then he should go and inspect a few of these boats on his own.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:17 pm to Bunk Moreland
Ron Paul has a very powerful son who could procedurally bring the Senate to a crawl , have his Staff Counselor file papers in Federal Court to stop the actions in the Caribbean if he wanted to, but hasn't seen fit to act.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
I think I just upvoted a post from SFP........double checking........YES i did. I must say 10 hail mary's immediately and beg for forgiveness. Please almighty father guide me in these weird and unusual times!
This post was edited on 12/9/25 at 2:22 pm
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:20 pm to kingbob
Yeah. I agree with all of that.
I still refuse to hyperventilate over it.
I still refuse to hyperventilate over it.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:20 pm to Jbird
quote:
"war secretary"
That gave me every indication where that article was headed
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:21 pm to BobBoucher
quote:
Then he should go and inspect a few of these boats on his own.
Yeah. That was the weakest part of the opinion.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:26 pm to Bunk Moreland
frick that contrarian attention whore
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:27 pm to Bunk Moreland
See, you're doing exactly what you said you weren't earlier. Siding with Paul who is here saying these guys aren't carrying drugs. Even though they are now being seen dumping their cargo into the sea.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Strong words from a man with a son taking millions annually from Maduro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Precisely. And kudos for posting this.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:29 pm to NytroBud
quote:
frick Ron Paul
Found a commie.
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:30 pm to udtiger
quote:
frick that contrarian attention whore
A second Comrade..
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:30 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Ron Paul opposed Ronald Reagan interfering with Berlin Wall
Posted on 12/9/25 at 2:31 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Strong words from a man with a son taking millions annually from Maduro
Hadn't heard that. Link, please? Thx
Back to top

47










