- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Wonder what it would cost to buy W Canada? Or is it better to just wait for the inevitable
Posted on 12/8/25 at 10:20 am
Posted on 12/8/25 at 10:20 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Concerned about losing access to the port of New Orleans, in 1803 President Thomas Jefferson sent James Monroe and Robert Livingston to Paris to attempt to buy the city from France, authorizing them to offer France up to $10 million for it.
Meanwhile, Napoleon had concluded that it wasn’t worth the cost for France to try to hold onto its vast North American territory. So when Monroe and Livingstone arrived to commence negotiations, they were astonished when France offered to sell the United States not just New Orleans, but the entire Louisiana Territory. The American commissioners did not have authority to negotiate any such deal, but when France offered the entire territory for only $15 million (only $5 million more than they were prepared to offer for New Orleans alone), the deal was too good to turn down. On April 30, 1803 they signed the Louisiana Purchase Treaty, by which the United States would acquire 828,000 square miles of land, at a price of three cents per acre (sixty cents per acre in current dollars). The deal would double the size of the United States. “This is the noblest work of our whole lives,” Livingston remarked.
When the commissioners returned to the United States with the remarkable treaty, Jefferson was amazed and delighted. But the road to ratification was anything but smooth. There were very serious objections to the constitutionality of the treaty and there was also the inconvenient fact that the United States didn’t actually have $15 million. But in the end, the proponents of the purchase prevailed, the U.S. borrowed the money from British financiers, and on October 20, 1803 (two hundred twenty-two years ago today) the Senate gave its advice and consent to ratification of the Louisiana Purchase Treaty—one of the best real estate bargains in history. “From this day the United States take their place among the powers of the first rank,” Livingston said.
#archaeohistories
Posted on 12/8/25 at 10:36 am to scrooster
The followup comments in that X thread are excellent.
Also, fwiw, ....
It was a steal of a deal, at the time, any way you look at it.
Alberta is very serious about seceding from Canada and British Columbia and Saskatchewan will follow.
If MAGA is still in control via Vance, when it all goes down, Western Canada could very well become part of the United States.
Also, fwiw, ....
quote:
$15,000,000 in 1803 US dollars is equivalent to approximately $430,056,637.17 in December 2025 dollars, reflecting the change in purchasing power due to inflation over 222 years.
This calculation uses the US Consumer Price Index (CPI), where the CPI was 11.3 in 1803 and 323.976 in 2025. The adjustment factor is 323.976 / 11.3 ˜ 28.6704, so $15,000,000 × 28.6704 = $430,056,637.17. This represents a cumulative inflation increase of 2,767.04%, or an average annual rate of 1.52%.
CPI data from 1913 onward comes from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, while pre-1913 values (including 1803) are historical estimates from sources like Robert Sahr's study at Oregon State University.
It was a steal of a deal, at the time, any way you look at it.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Alberta is very serious about seceding from Canada and British Columbia and Saskatchewan will follow.
If MAGA is still in control via Vance, when it all goes down, Western Canada could very well become part of the United States.
This post was edited on 12/8/25 at 11:16 am
Posted on 12/8/25 at 10:46 am to scrooster
From a purely outdoors standpoint, this would be absolutely incredible.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 10:48 am to scrooster
Make Canada America's hat again.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 10:57 am to scrooster
quote:
Albert is very serious about succeeding from Canada and British Columbia and Saskatchewan will follow.
About 164 years ago, some pathetic losers attempted to do the same thing in the United States. It turned out to be the worst chapter in our nation's history.
Hopefully Canada will not suffer a civil war.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 11:19 am to Tchefuncte Tiger
quote:
It’s “seceding.”
Thank you.
I should proofread before posting. Went back and caught three autocorrect errors ... Albert instead of Alberta, seceding instead of succeeding, and steal instead of steel.
Much appreciated.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 12:30 pm to scrooster
frick those degens from up north.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 12:34 pm to scrooster
Didn't the court up there rule that the independence vote is unconstitutional?
Posted on 12/8/25 at 12:38 pm to scrooster
quote:
Wonder what it would cost to buy W Canada?
F that. They'll have to pay us
Posted on 12/8/25 at 12:39 pm to scrooster
It should not depend on me to point out the obvious - $350
Posted on 12/8/25 at 2:51 pm to scrooster
One of the first comments to the X post was:

quote:
And Rand Paul would have filibustered it.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 3:02 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Didn't the court up there rule that the independence vote is unconstitutional?
I don't think Western Canucks give a cafrick.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 3:08 pm to scrooster
Western Canada is tired of paying the freight for idiots to the east.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 4:05 pm to scrooster
Nowhere in all of that did I get an inkling of desire for them to cut one loose and join a worse one. That would be extremely stupid if they are seeking independence.
But that’s just one side of the story, I’d like to see if anyone up there disagrees with his take.
But that’s just one side of the story, I’d like to see if anyone up there disagrees with his take.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 5:34 pm to Clark14
quote:
Nowhere in all of that did I get an inkling of desire for them to cut one loose and join a worse one.
You believe the U.S. is worse than Canada?
You do not believe that Alberta has made open overtures to Trump about wanting to join the U.S.?
You've.not been keeping up these past ten months, have you? You've missed a lot.
Posted on 12/8/25 at 7:17 pm to scrooster
quote:
You believe the U.S. is worse than Canada? You do not believe that Alberta has made open overtures to Trump about wanting to join the U.S.? You've.not been keeping up these past ten months, have you? You've missed a lot.
America is in a hell of a mess right now and being run by an incompetent idiot. I know of no overtures from Alberta to want to become part of this country but maybe you can link some of these overtures so we can see them. I don’t watch fox.
Back to top

6








