- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
LSU Basketball 19th in first NET rankings of the year
Posted on 12/1/25 at 8:59 am
Posted on 12/1/25 at 8:59 am
CMM Finna feast
4- Vanderbilt
12- Tennessee
14- Alabama
15-Kentucky
19-LSU
30-Auburn
33-Florida
36-Georgia
45-Arkansas
51-Missouri
68-Texas
79-Texas A&M
94-Oklahoma
96-Ole Miss
99-South Carolina
172-Mississippi St.
4- Vanderbilt
12- Tennessee
14- Alabama
15-Kentucky
19-LSU
30-Auburn
33-Florida
36-Georgia
45-Arkansas
51-Missouri
68-Texas
79-Texas A&M
94-Oklahoma
96-Ole Miss
99-South Carolina
172-Mississippi St.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:01 am to Pnels08
They played extremely well on both sides of the ball against Depaul. The next three games (maybe not Boston college because they're pretty terrible) should give a better glimpse into how this team performs against better competition. But so far, so good
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:01 am to Pnels08
Played genuinely good ball in November. Very excited to see this team play competent opponents.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:05 am to Aforem7
Yea Texas Tech is pretty good, with one of the best players in the country, so will be a strong test.
SMU is probably another bubble team, at least somewhat should be on the same level of LSU. That is one you really want to win due to our non conference schedule.
SMU net ranking of 39
Texas tech with a net of 37
SMU is probably another bubble team, at least somewhat should be on the same level of LSU. That is one you really want to win due to our non conference schedule.
SMU net ranking of 39
Texas tech with a net of 37
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:06 am to Aforem7
quote:
The next three games (maybe not Boston college because they're pretty terrible)
Opponent rankings:
#166 BC (4-4)
#37 Texas Tech (6-2)
#39 SMU (8-0)
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:08 am to Pnels08
Shocking to see VANDERBILT at #4 NET. Just two seasons ago they were rock bottom before replacing Jerry Stackhouse with a no-name guy who can really coach!
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:12 am to JimTiger72
Boston College will be an away game and the other two are neutral games so BC will be a Q3 game and the other two will be Q1 games
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:12 am to Pnels08
Schedule is about to get real over the next couple weeks, looking forward to seeing what we really have potentially this season
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:14 am to Pnels08
Texas Tech and SMU will both be major challenges. And we can't treat Boston College on the road lightly
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:22 am to Pnels08
Just looking at some of the teams we played this season
Depaul 183
Drake 153
UNO 161 ( They are having a wildly good season)
Tarleton St 158
So again... no-one worth bragging about but at least we have decimated them
Depaul 183
Drake 153
UNO 161 ( They are having a wildly good season)
Tarleton St 158
So again... no-one worth bragging about but at least we have decimated them
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:30 am to Pnels08
I'm looking more at how the team is playing as opposed to rankings. 7 players in double figures against Depaul and almost 8 with one player scoring 8 points. 22 assists between 8 players also. This shows good ball movement and good decision making. We aren't getting destroyed on the boards like in the past and they play great help defense and perimeter defense with Nwoko and Miller protecting the lane. Going to be an interesting 3 game stretch.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:39 am to Pnels08
quote:
UNO 161 ( They are having a wildly good season)
I mean kind of but not really?
They are 2-5, got that win over TCU but just got demolished by Texas Tech. Took MSU to OT though. Lost to a bad Pepperdine team.
They are all over the map
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 9:40 am
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:40 am to Pnels08
People are getting their expectations high only for them to win 6 games in the SEC. Sad
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:44 am to mcspufftiger7
quote:
I'm looking more at how the team is playing as opposed to rankings. 7 players in double figures against Depaul and almost 8 with one player scoring 8 points. 22 assists between 8 players also. This shows good ball movement and good decision making. We aren't getting destroyed on the boards like in the past and they play great help defense and perimeter defense with Nwoko and Miller protecting the lane. Going to be an interesting 3 game stretch.
Dedan Thomas is an absolute game changer offensively for us
Offense has been flowing smooth all season and honestly Jalen Reece is getting better each week himself. The Depaul game he put on a clinic with 13 points on 6 of 6 from the floor with 6 assists and 0 turnovers
17 assists to 5 turnovers on the season from your BACKUP PG is a great thing to see
Dedan Thomas has 49 assists to just 9 turnovers
Our guys running the point are doing a ridiculous job on the offensive end....66 assists to 14 turnovers is a heck of a ratio
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 9:47 am
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:45 am to Pnels08
quote:
Shocking to see VANDERBILT at #4 NET. Just two seasons ago they were rock bottom before replacing Jerry Stackhouse with a no-name guy who can really coach!
Kind of throws a wrench into the "he started with nothing, give him time" excuse.
That aside, this is the most efficient LSU has been on either side of the ball under McMahon. Particularly offensively where LSU has NEVER been efficient under McMahon. Right now LSU is ranked nationally:
5th in PPG
2nd in FG%
1st in 2 point FG%
4th in (raw) offensive efficiency (doesn't factor in strength of opponent)
8th in average scoring margin
The first 5 games were, at best, inconsistent defensively. Particularly vs. Alcorn and FIU. However, they dominated Drake and DePaul defensively. Really, outside of the 2nd half vs. Drake, LSU destroyed the competition this past weekend. That effort defensively fueled the big jump in the KenPom and, as a byproduct, the NET ratings.
The schedule to date has been incredibly weak. That said, LSU has done what good teams should do against such a weak schedule, dominate. But that schedule is also the source of the continued unknown about the team. How good are they? If you look at the NET top 40 LSU has played the worst schedule. That's not going to improve much with BC because they are probably no better than Drake and DePaul...if better at all.
There is more reason to be optimistic now than at any point in McMahon's tenure. The Texas Tech (although there are some reasons for concern with them) and SMU games should give us a much, much better evaluation of this team.
Beat BC and (at worst) split the TTU/SMU, then I think LSU will have had about as successful OOC portion of the schedule as one could reasonably hope for. That would give them a reasonable margin for error in SEC play.
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 9:49 am
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:46 am to Pnels08
Just checked and saw this. Really shocked at this but I am here for it. Let’s go 2-1 over the next 3, go into the SEC with 1 loss, if you go 9-9 in the SEC with this NET right now, that’s a 6/7 seed in the tourney. Let’s goooo
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:48 am to LSUButt
quote:
Just checked and saw this. Really shocked at this but I am here for it. Let’s go 2-1 over the next 3, go into the SEC with 1 loss, if you go 9-9 in the SEC with this NET right now, that’s a 6/7 seed in the tourney. Let’s goooo
I would not bank on 9-9 even getting us in the tournament with how bad the SEC looks this season. It's seriously taken a gigantic step back. IF we go with just 1 loss in non-conf, maybe, but we would be nowhere near a 6/7 seed with a 9-9 conference record
The SEc might only be a 6 or 7 bid league this season.
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 9:49 am
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:51 am to Pnels08
I think our best data point to date is the game that didnt count vs ucf. Both teams played and coached that game like a real game. They are 60th in kenpom and 58th in net. And we beat them at their place. Its not everything, but its something.
This post was edited on 12/1/25 at 9:51 am
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:51 am to Alt26
quote:
Kind of throws a wrench into the "he started with nothing, give him time" excuse.
Vandy hasn't played a soul either and had a first round NIT exit last year so I wouldn't kiss that guys arse too much yet so you can shite on CMM. CMM may need to be fired but it does take time at a place like LSU to win in basketball with how good the SEC is now.
Posted on 12/1/25 at 9:52 am to tzimme4
Nobody is getting their expectations high they just aren't miserable human beings who are letting things play out and enjoying what positivity they can.
Popular
Back to top

13





