Started By
Message

Easy Fix to the Conference Championship Issue

Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:28 am
Posted by TomRollTideRitter
Member since Aug 2016
13117 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:28 am
This setup where Texas A&M has benefited from losing to their arch rival is a major problem for college football. Ohio State benefited from losing to Michigan last year, and likely would if they lose again today which is sad to say about what should be one of the biggest games of the year.

This has an easy fix. Make the non-conference title participants in the playoff field play games on conference championship weekend against the top teams outside the field.

Assuming the favorites win today, the power conference games next week would be:

SEC Title: Alabama vs UGA
B1G Title: Ohio State vs Indiana
Big XII Title: BYU v Texas Tech
ACC Title: UVA vs SMU

Additional games (seeded like a bracket but don’t allow rematches):
Texas @ Oregon
USC @ Texas A&M (assumes Michigan drops below USC with a loss today)
Vanderbilt @ Ole Miss
Miami @ Oklahoma
Utah @ Notre Dame

Eliminates the free bye week reward for missing the conference title, eliminates the idea that you should lose on rivalry week because if A&M lost to Texas and USC consecutively, they could drop all the way out.

If Ohio State lost to Michigan and then a home game to USC, even they could drop all the way out.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
36376 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:30 am to
quote:

This setup where Texas A&M has benefited from losing to their arch rival is a major problem for college football.


I can assure you A&M was trying to win that game last night. It’s not ideal, but it doesn’t really matter
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
79900 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:30 am to
Get rid of conference title games, it's that simple
Posted by josh336
baton rouge
Member since Jan 2007
81850 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:32 am to
Yep, they arent needed
Posted by msutiger
Houston
Member since Jul 2008
71356 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:33 am to
I kept laughing at ABC flashing title game scenarios over and over again all day yesterday. They are trying to force it as a big game. The game means nothing at all, but ABC needs eyeballs.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69474 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:33 am to
quote:

I can assure you A&M was trying to win that game last night.


That is definitely true but still doesn't change the fact that Texas A&M will benefit from the loss.
Posted by TomRollTideRitter
Member since Aug 2016
13117 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:34 am to
quote:

I can assure you A&M was trying to win that game last night. It’s not ideal, but it doesn’t really matter


I agree, but I don’t think teams should be punished for competing. In terms of the playoff, A&M would have been better off sitting starters.

What happens if Reed blew his acl on his almost injury? Does A&M still play starters next year?

Narduzzi earlier this year already said Pitt-Notre Dame did not matter.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
36376 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:35 am to
quote:

What happens if Reed blew his acl on his almost injury? Does A&M still play starters next year?


Yes
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
32750 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:37 am to
Kosmo Cramer is clearly right but as long as the conferences (and the networks) make money, the title games won’t go away.

The only thing I can see that will make the conference title games go away is expanding the playoff to 16 teams.

Of course, this has its own problems, namely further diluting the regular season.
This post was edited on 11/29/25 at 9:38 am
Posted by nola tiger lsu
Member since Nov 2007
6889 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:39 am to
quote:

sad to say about what should be one of the biggest games of the year.


Nothing sad about it, it was a game the SEC created out of greed. They need to eliminate these games.
Posted by TomRollTideRitter
Member since Aug 2016
13117 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:41 am to
quote:

Get rid of conference title games, it's that simple


Or just shrink the playoff. Or just go back to the BCS.

Realistically none of these things will happen though because the networks don’t want less content.

The SEC title last year had 16.6M viewers which was higher than every round 1 playoff game and higher than 2 of the 4 quarterfinals.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
78957 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:44 am to
Too complicated.

Break up the superconferences and have a round robin.
Posted by TideSaint
Hill Country
Member since Sep 2008
82881 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Get rid of conference title games, it's that simple


They make the conferences a shite load of money.

They aren't going away.
Posted by RandySavage
9 Time Natty Winner
Member since May 2012
34741 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:47 am to
quote:

This setup where Texas A&M has benefited from losing to their arch rival is a major problem for college football.


College football has a ton of problems, this isn't one of them. Texas A&M does not benefit from this situation. They are now forced to play an extra elimination game.
Posted by TomRollTideRitter
Member since Aug 2016
13117 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 9:47 am to
quote:

Nothing sad about it, it was a game the SEC created out of greed. They need to eliminate these games.


I’m talking about Michigan-Ohio State. The stakes of the game being pretty low for Ohio State is what is sad.

I would be fine with doing away with conference title games. I just don’t think it’ll realistically happen.
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
86258 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 10:00 am to
They were giving conf champs bye last year. People bitched. Surprise surprise, they changed and people are still bitching.

quote:

This setup where Texas A&M has benefited from losing to their arch rival


This is highly debatable. First of all, they miss out on a conference championship that they've been chasing.


And if we ignore that, yeah you get cake walk in the first round but after that you're playing the better teams earlier than you would have if you had a higher seed.
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
7135 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 10:04 am to
So make a 20 team playoff.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
70769 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 10:11 am to
The “fix” was not expanding the playoffs to so many teams.

They could’ve had it both ways keeping the playoff field smaller and having 1vs 2 in each conference be a defacto playoff round.
Posted by GeauxPanthers2
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Dec 2024
1018 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 10:11 am to
quote:

That is definitely true but still doesn't change the fact that Texas A&M will benefit from the loss.

Nah.

They will be the 8 seed now and their path may be Notre Dame then Ohio State.

If they would have won last night, and then lost the SEC Championship Game, they would have been the 5 seed at worst.
Posted by theCAW
Polk County
Member since Dec 2023
7021 posts
Posted on 11/29/25 at 10:12 am to
quote:

Get rid of conference title games, it's that simple
bingo
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram