- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Activist Judge overturns unanimous jury verdict in a $7.2M Medicaid fraud case…
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:06 am
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:06 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. SUICIDAL EMPATHY: A Minnesota Democrat judge just overturned a unanimous jury verdict in a $7.2M Medicaid fraud case, freeing Islamic defendant Abdi Fatah Yusuf. Jurors say the evidence was overwhelming.
Despite a swift unanimous verdict, Judge Sarah S. West, a former public defender, acquitted Abdi Fatah Yusuf on all charges after jurors found he and his wife ran a fake home-health business out of a mailbox and stole $7.2M in Medicaid funds. Jurors say they are stunned because the evidence of fraud, overbilling and luxury spending was “obvious.” Community pressure and political considerations are now being blamed for the decision. Yusuf walks free while taxpayers eat the loss.
Abdi will get to keep his new wardrobe from Coach, Canada Goose, Michael Kors, Third Degree Heat, Nike, and Nordstrom and his whip a Porsche 911.
21
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:10 am to Placekicker
Every liberal alive supports this. Don't let them fool you to pretend they don't. They love judicial activism at the expense of the American citizen.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:11 am to BugAC
Rexcatur's kinda judge.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:12 am to BugAC
these judges are democrats not Americans
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:12 am to Placekicker
Another White Liberal woman. I’m shocked. These women are destroying our country from within.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:13 am to Placekicker
Wonder how this judge would have ruled if the perps were white christians.
This is a rhetorical question, by the way.
This is a rhetorical question, by the way.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:15 am to SludgeFactory
I assume this will be appealed and overturned?
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:15 am to Placekicker
Mail fraud is a felony. Can he not be retried in a federal court?
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:17 am to Placekicker
This is just more legal nonsense. All the documentation proved there was fraud in the business and his brother had his name all over. The one they tried, the actual owner did not, even though he was spending money like a king. Had they taken the time to show the money from the business to the owner, not just the fraud itself, they would have convicted him.
Total bullshite, but I see the judge's view from a legal standpoint.
Total bullshite, but I see the judge's view from a legal standpoint.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:18 am to Placekicker
Decatur say… follow the judges orders or else.
“No Kings!!!”
“No Kings!!!”
This post was edited on 11/25/25 at 11:20 am
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:18 am to TDTOM
quote:
I assume this will be appealed and overturned?
Appealed? Yes.
Overturned? Likely, but no guarantee
This post was edited on 11/25/25 at 11:21 am
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:19 am to Placekicker
The brazen corruption is staggering …..
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:20 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
This is just more legal nonsense. All the documentation proved there was fraud in the business and his brother had his name all over. The one they tried, the actual owner did not, even though he was spending money like a king. Had they taken the time to show the money from the business to the owner, not just the fraud itself, they would have convicted him.
Total bullshite, but I see the judge's view from a legal standpoint.
Thanks for adding context. The outrage machine hates context.
It appears that, once again, the X engagement farmer mispresented the facts of the case.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:21 am to Placekicker
What was the legal reasoning for overturning the verdict?
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:23 am to Placekicker
The judge is benefiting from the fraud in someway.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:23 am to Placekicker
There is nothing to say but this judge needs to be investigated for fraud....
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:28 am to trinidadtiger
How can the judge simply overturn a jury's unanimous verdict?
Judge Ito should have done that with OJ's verdict if judges can simply rule against a jury.
Why is the point of having a jury if the judge is gonna intervene anyway?
Judge Ito should have done that with OJ's verdict if judges can simply rule against a jury.
Why is the point of having a jury if the judge is gonna intervene anyway?
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:31 am to Bama Mountain
quote:
facts of the case.
Some scumbag Somali stole your money and spent it on a bunch of shite.
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:32 am to Placekicker
Posted on 11/25/25 at 11:34 am to trinidadtiger
You are why we can't have nice things.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News