Started By
Message

ESPN and CFP Extending Playoff Expansion Deadline

Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:09 pm
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
51391 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:09 pm
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
128864 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:14 pm to
Should just go to 16 no byes and eliminate conf champ games
This post was edited on 11/24/25 at 2:15 pm
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36244 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:23 pm to
I guess they want to see how it shakes out this season and how it’s received by fans before making any changes. Which makes sense to me.
Posted by TigersHuskers
Nebraska
Member since Oct 2014
14411 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:26 pm to
It'd be dumb if they expanded it. 12 is already too much. 4 was good with 6 being the max.
Posted by TigersHuskers
Nebraska
Member since Oct 2014
14411 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Should just go to 16 no byes and eliminate conf champ games


Why not just the whole top 20 at this point? Let's get some 4 loss teams in there too. Go ahead and make the regular season meaningless.

I hate the direction of CFB
Posted by Cliff Booth
Member since Feb 2021
3098 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

eliminate conf champ games


The Big 10 championship game is going to be the most pointless one ever played. They gotta do something different.
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
4099 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:33 pm to
They are just determined to turn college football into college basketball. A mostly irrelevant regular season followe by a winner take all tournament that's the only thing that matters.

Lose your big out of conference game.
Go 0-3 against your three biggest rivals.
8-4 and still in the tournament.

Completely pathetic.

The stakes of regular season games mean nothing at that point.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
40530 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

Should just go to 16 no byes and eliminate conf champ games


yes, because if the playoffs have shown us anything, it's that it needs more crappy teams.
Posted by BogeyTX
Member since Apr 2018
978 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:38 pm to
Am I crazy for asking why should ESPN get a say in anything for CFB?

I understand that they want a good product to show but I don’t like that they have any input for how CFB is ran.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
128864 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

yes, because if the playoffs have shown us anything, it's that it needs more crappy teams.


You act like they care about the final product

They care about TV money
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
53681 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:39 pm to
what the sec should do is keep the conference title game and play it last week of regular season, that would be the #1 and #2 teams 9th conference game instead of making them play an extra game and you can keep the game intact - you can determine the two reps in that game based on the 8 team sec schedule

move the rivalry games to earlier in the season to avoid any potential conflict
make sure everyone has a SEC team the last game of the season and those games would be determined once the conference title game is set

the conference title game would have it's own window on that Sat and all other sec games could be played friday and Sat not to conflict with the title game for 7 pm that night in Atlanta
Posted by OldmanBeasley
Charlotte
Member since Jun 2014
10892 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:46 pm to
It’s time to stop messing around and go to a 128 team playoff.
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
33883 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

It’s time to stop messing around and go to a 128 team playoff.



UMASS @ Ohio State would set offensive records
Posted by Radio One
On the banks of the Wabash
Member since Sep 2023
5701 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

It’s time to stop messing around and go to a 128 team playoff.

It’s the only way to produce a truly legitimate national champion.

As long as everyone agrees they won’t argue about seeding and regional placement.
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
78821 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 2:56 pm to
Go back to the OG conferences, have the Metro play football, have the SEC with 10 teams, bring the SWC and PAC back.

Have the old school bowl matchups.

Ban mulligans.

Do a plus one after the bowls if there are more than two undefeated teams. Otherwise split the title.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35579 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

Should just go to 16 no byes and eliminate conf champ games

I would add no auto bids.

Nothing other than top 16 teams. First two rounds on campus.
Posted by GeauxPanthers2
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Dec 2024
962 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

The Big 10 championship game is going to be the most pointless one ever played. They gotta do something different.

The first round has to be all on campus games, and they either need to bring back byes or guarantee home games for conference champs.

Then the Big Ten championship Game isn’t meaningless because the loser could have to play a road game in the first round.

Many may say that’s stupid, but it’s pretty much exactly what the NFL does. It’s why the 14-3 Vikings traveled in the Wildcard Round last year, it’s why the AFC South champion hosts a team that’s higher in the standings nearly every season, etc.
Posted by SoDakHawk
South Dakota
Member since Jun 2014
9959 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

The stakes of regular season games mean nothing at that point.


Not true. The final weekend this season proves it. There are a bunch of big games this weekend that have huge implications on the CFP.

It's nice that the coverage has widened from maybe 4 teams to talking about 16-20 teams in the hunt.
Posted by jlovel7
NOT Louisiana
Member since Aug 2014
23732 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Not true. The final weekend this season proves it. There are a bunch of big games this weekend that have huge implications on the CFP.


Yes for teams that shouldn’t sniff the meaningful post season.
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
4099 posts
Posted on 11/24/25 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Not true. The final weekend this season proves it. There are a bunch of big games this weekend that have huge implications on the CFP.

It's nice that the coverage has widened from maybe 4 teams to talking about 16-20 teams in the hunt.


It's increased the pool of meaningful games at the bottom at the expense of stakes at the top. Last year's Ohio State vs Michigan game was the perfect example. Michigan pulls a huge upset on the road of a hated rival, and it meant nothing. Throughout all of college football history it would have torpedoed Ohio Stat's entire season. How famous would the "kick six" game be if both Alabama and Auburn were in the playoffs 2 weeks later? Because that would have been the result.

I would also argue the "meaningful" games at the bottom are basically fake. Teams in the top 10 are actually capable of having deep playoff runs. Fringe top 20 teams simply aren't.

Two 8-4 teams battling for the last playoff spot may seem "meaningful" but it's in reality just who gets the honor of losing by 21+ in the first round to a real team.

A big playoff produces more national interest in the sport, because more teams are in the hunt, but the uniqueness and specialness of college football's regular season has been destroyed. It used to be the most meaningful regular season in all of major sports. The bigger the playoff field, the less that becomes true.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram