- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
John Kasich is glad leaders in congress reject the Ukrainian peace plan.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:01 am
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:01 am
Why the frick are we so invested in this debacle?
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
28
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:03 am to Sassafrasology
The son of a mailman can eat a bag of dicks.
This post was edited on 11/24/25 at 7:04 am
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:12 am to Sassafrasology
He once was considered a good conservative. Looks like some men don’t need makeup to hide their true face
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:15 am to Sassafrasology
quote:
Why the frick are we so invested in this debacle?
I could be totally mistaken but I think we kinda sorta said we would protect them if they got rid of their nukes. It wasn't a full fledged 'we will go scorched earth' type of protection but still some assistance.
Again I could be mistaken.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:17 am to Sassafrasology
Yeah, more people have to die, so we can get a better deal
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:19 am to Sassafrasology
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:22 am to Sassafrasology
quote:
Why the frick are we so invested in this debacle?
I stated YEARS BEFORE, Ukraine was one of the best global deep state corruption honey holes. Think Hunter Biden and Burisma ( which was just a tiny point of light in a supernova worth of corruption )
This is why
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:22 am to Sassafrasology
Old Twitch!!
Such a pos.
Such a pos.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:24 am to Sassafrasology
quote:
Why the frick are we so invested in this debacle?
Several reasons...
1. The MIC is going to eat...
2. This is a big piece of the congressional money laundering operations...
3. They have been unsuccessful in kicking things off somewhere else to replace Ukraine....
4. They want their secrets buried deep...
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:24 am to Sassafrasology
Now all we need is Jeb’s input to complete the 2016 circle.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:29 am to dupergreenie
quote:
I could be totally mistaken but I think we kinda sorta said we would protect them if they got rid of their nukes.
What a foreign policy. Why stop with Ukraine?
Attention to all nuclear armed powers,
The USA has announced it will kinda sorta protect you if you give up your nuclear arms. There will be peace on earth.
It is as simple as our nations 2nd Amendment. More guns less crime.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:31 am to dupergreenie
quote:
I could be totally mistaken but I think we kinda sorta said we would protect them if they got rid of their nukes.
You are right. I forgot about the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons in 1994.
But as I now remember the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons in 1994 was an “assurance” not a “guarantee”. With that said the objective was to get the former USSR nukes out of Ukrainian hands and further away from Europe and consolidate them under Russia to prevent proliferation. It worked.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:33 am to Sassafrasology
Hey that’s @displacedcuckeye and @rogertheshrubber’s pick for prez
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:34 am to Sassafrasology
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:34 am to TDTOM
quote:
The son of a mailman can eat a bag of dicks.
He is definitely eating something. Probably still getting kickbacks from the Military Industrial Complex.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:38 am to Sassafrasology
quote:
You are right. I forgot about the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons in 1994.
But as I now remember the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons in 1994 was an “assurance” not a “guarantee”. With that said the objective was to get the former USSR nukes out of Ukrainian hands and further away from Europe and consolidate them under Russia to prevent proliferation. It worked.
I probably should have googled it before I posted.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:38 am to dupergreenie
quote:
said we would protect them if they got rid of their nukes.
We have supplied and assisted plenty and now time for the war to end.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:41 am to Sassafrasology
quote:
the objective was to get the former USSR nukes out of Ukrainian hands and further away from Europe
Yes the reality was Ukraine didn't have the ability to control and maintain the weapons and the west was scared they would end up on the black market. But it works for revisionist propagandists to pretend otherwise.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:41 am to Sassafrasology
This is exactly how a douche bag works everyone. Take notes for future reference.
Posted on 11/24/25 at 7:43 am to JellyRoll
quote:
We have supplied and assisted plenty and now time for the war to end.
No. It is time for the United States to back away and let these two fight it out.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News