- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Mike Johnson responds to Trump’s post about the dems seditious behavior
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:34 pm
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:34 pm
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
the DOJ & the Pentagon are looking into the legality of all that
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 12:37 pm
11
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:37 pm to hawgfaninc
Interesting fact: Johnson walked over the exact spot that John Quincy Adams died in that video. It’s in the statute room. That’s where the original House of Reps was located.
Adams served in congress long after his presidency and died at his desk.
Adams served in congress long after his presidency and died at his desk.
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:38 pm to _Hurricane_
That is interesting
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:43 pm to hawgfaninc
I wonder if there is any consideration given to the fact that the reps in the video were former mil / ic people. It isn't like they are AOC or someone with a strictly civilian background.
I'm certain a lot of care went into the crafting of that PSA, shopped and reviewed by a multitude of attorneys in order to barely put a toenail over the line.
I'm certain a lot of care went into the crafting of that PSA, shopped and reviewed by a multitude of attorneys in order to barely put a toenail over the line.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:43 pm to hawgfaninc
Every damned one of them should be stripped of every committee assignment and expelled.
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:53 pm to hawgfaninc
These democrats have stepped over the line.. But this is what happens when nothing is done... Now is the time to send a message to these petulant children..
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:55 pm to hawgfaninc
I'm pretty tired of Indian heat miser
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:57 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
the DOJ & the Pentagon are looking into the legality of all that
Update: nothing they said was illegal
Posted on 11/20/25 at 12:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
You already junked up the other threads, shoo!
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:00 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
any consideration given to the fact that the reps in the video were former mil / ic people
If anything, they know better and their punishment should be as harsh at it can be... the former military should be recalled to active duty and court martialed...
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:04 pm to hawgfaninc
Republican politicians: "Political violence has become all too common in American society, and this is not who we are."
Democratic politicians: “No one has to carry out orders that violate the law, or our Constitution”
POTUS:
Democratic politicians: “No one has to carry out orders that violate the law, or our Constitution”
POTUS:
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:15 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
You already junked up the other threads, shoo!
Democrat criminal defense attorney to the rescue!
Posted on 11/20/25 at 1:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Update: nothing they said was illegal
It sure a hell was...
They said nothing about a specific order.
Shouting "fire" to incite fear and panic when there is no fire is an "Act of Incitement."
"Incitement" is not protected free speech under the first amendment..
When a group encourages blanket insubordination it is a form of "RICO Incitement to Sedition."
Not a death sentence, but still a first degree felony punishable by a possible lengthy jail sentence..
This post was edited on 11/20/25 at 2:27 pm
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:33 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
I wonder if there is any consideration given to the fact t
Sure, that should be taken into consideration. It means they can be tried under the UCMJ.
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Update: nothing they said was illegal
I think you need to look at the applicable laws. A case could be made and a good one.
quote:
(1)advises, counsels, urges, or in any manner causes or attempts to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the military or naval forces of the United States; or
18 us Code2387....
Posted on 11/20/25 at 2:41 pm to antibarner
How can complying with only lawful orders and the Constitution fall under
?
quote:
e insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty
?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
How can complying with only lawful orders and the Constitution fall under
How can saying "march peacefully" fit the definition of inciting an insurrection?
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:11 pm to moneyg
I don't know. I don't know where that's happened and I certainly haven't made that argument
Posted on 11/20/25 at 3:11 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
10 U.S. Code § 892 - Art. 92. Failure to obey order or regulation
Any person subject to this chapter who—
(1)violates or fails to obey any lawful general order or regulation;
(2)having knowledge of any other lawful order issued by a member of the armed forces, which it is his duty to obey, fails to obey the order; or
(3)is derelict in the performance of his duties;
shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.
The critical requirement for dereliction is that the order be lawful. Refusing to obey an unlawful order is not a violation of the law.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News