- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Bill and Hill refuse to appear to answer Epstein Questions
Posted on 11/19/25 at 11:43 am
Posted on 11/19/25 at 11:43 am
13
Posted on 11/19/25 at 11:46 am to NewbombII
“Can’t have this!! We need all the information!! We need everything!! Let them testify to prove their innocence!!!”
Right leftists? Or nah. Put this in the stack with all the other Dem Epstein friends and benefactors?
Right leftists? Or nah. Put this in the stack with all the other Dem Epstein friends and benefactors?
Posted on 11/19/25 at 11:48 am to NewbombII
Why no subpoena?
Oh that's because it's all theater
Oh that's because it's all theater
Posted on 11/19/25 at 11:50 am to NewbombII
And the same court that convicted Bannon and Navarro for the same thing would find them not guilty.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 11:53 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:02 pm to NewbombII
quote:Can you provide a link confirming this assertion.
Bill and Hill refuse to appear to answer Epstein Questions
What I have seen is that the Committee hit them with subpoenas without consulting regarding their availability, that they declined to appear on the noticed date(s), and that the Committee and the Clintons are in discussions to find a date convenient to both the Committee and the witness(es).
Unfortunately, this is how about half of Congressional depositions get scheduled, because the Committee issuing the subpoena invariably does not have the courtesy to consult regarding availability, but is instead just seeking the attaboys for issuing and serving the subpoena.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:04 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
What I have seen is that the Committee hit them with subpoenas without consulting regarding their availability,
Shouldn’t matter. Cancel the plans. Has anyone gotten a federal jury duty summons with dates you can fill in for your availability?
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:08 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Can you provide a link confirming this assertion.
Perhaps the Rep that posted the tweet.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:09 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
What I have seen is that the Committee hit them with subpoenas without consulting regarding their availability, that they declined to appear on the noticed date(s), and that the Committee and the Clintons are in discussions to find a date convenient to both the Committee and the witness(es).
Can you provide a link??
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:10 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
does not have the courtesy to consult regarding availability,
If I get called to testify in court I’m pretty sure I don’t get to tell the court when I’m available
Either show up or receive a bench warrant
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:14 pm to CleverUserName
quote:Outside Congress, 99% of depositions are scheduled by agreement. You only do a unilateral subpoena if the witness is refusing to work with you on scheduling.quote:Shouldn’t matter. Cancel the plans. Has anyone gotten a federal jury duty summons with dates you can fill in for your availability?
What I have seen is that the Committee hit them with subpoenas without consulting regarding their availability,
It is only Congress that grandstands like this.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:16 pm to deltaland
quote:This is not a trial. It is just "fact finding." In essence, no different that a discovery deposition. See above.
If I get called to testify in court I’m pretty sure I don’t get to tell the court when I’m available
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:19 pm to bbvdd
quote:Would a noted Progressive outlet like the New York Post suffice?
What I have seen is that the Committee hit them with subpoenas without consulting regarding their availability, that they declined to appear on the noticed date(s), and that the Committee and the Clintons are in discussions to find a date convenient to both the Committee and the witness(es).quote:
Can you provide a link??
quote:People, quit the whining. This is how these things are done. Stop with the martyr complex.
an Oversight Committee spokesperson told The Post ... that the panel is “having conversations with the Clintons’ attorney to accommodate their schedules.”
Seriously, four people smarted-off in response to my original post. Have any of the four of you ever given a deposition (your divorce case, maybe)? Did you get hit with a subpoena "out of the blue," or was the deposition sheduled by agreement through your attorney?
This post was edited on 11/19/25 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 11/19/25 at 12:21 pm to NewbombII
They have to rehearse reciting "I invoke my 5th amendment privilege."
Posted on 11/19/25 at 1:26 pm to NewbombII
Bill's best friend
Posted on 11/19/25 at 2:04 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:The stupidity seems to have stopped, when its promulgators were confronted with facts. A rarity.quote:Would a noted Progressive outlet like the New York Post suffice?
Can you provide a link??
Posted on 11/19/25 at 2:32 pm to NewbombII
Anna Paulina Luna, Tim Burchett and Brandon Gill should be running this country. The three most based politicians in D.C.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 2:53 pm to deltaland
For a deposition? Of course you can negotiate the date.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 2:54 pm to NewbombII
Give them the Steve Bannon treatment.
Posted on 11/19/25 at 2:56 pm to NewbombII
I believe Steve Bannon spent 6 months in prison for not showing up to congress.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News