Started By
Message

Your Pick: President & Athletic Director (Why & Why Not)

Posted on 11/1/25 at 12:56 pm
Posted by SWTiger81
Member since Jan 2025
24 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 12:56 pm
Your pick:
LSU President & AD (from the known small list we are now at)

Rules:
—Leave politics/governor/BOS out of this thread. I think most of us understand how the swamp operates.

—Focus your sentiment on delivering facts, experiences & things you know of first hand.

—Be critical, but save the rumors, drama & negativity for the hair salon.


My Picks & Why:
—Dr. Wade Rousse for President:
—Heath Schroyer for Athletic Director

Dr. Wade Rousse:
—Well articulated
—focused on Quantitative measure
—Strong background in applied finance & management
—Worked for the federal reserve as an economist
—has not been a career government employee milking the clock/system
—Is not afraid to work. I don’t see the other 2 outworking him
—Visibly down to earth and will be accessible by both faculty & students
—His wife will come with the deal which basically is two hires for the price of 1 (not sure if the other two offer the same)
—Grew up impoverished in South Louisiana & self made.
—No kids, so no distractions.
—Has a lot more in common with the average person than I see in the competition

Heath Schroyer:
—Has a strong proven synergy with Wade Rousse during time at McNeese

—Loyal & like Rousse, also very hard working

—though the packaged acquisition is unreasonable, the significance as to why it would be attractive for the school is for the sake of efficiency, rapid turnaround & goal empowered mindsets

—Has made his fair share of mistakes in life & with some hires, but atleast decent enough to own up to it and make changes instead of forcing everyone to stick it through for the sake of personal ‘image’

—If you actually know and/or have had a real conversation Coach Will Wade, you will know that Schroyer was who actually pioneered that relationship. Schroyer went against the conservative leaders, including even Rousse, then ultimately sold WW to the leadership by delivering a solid plan which appears to have materialized with two NCAA appearances & 7 figure buyout received in the end.

For those of us (for transparency—yes, I do) who wish to see Will Wade aka The General back, I will take bets that he will not return back to this state without Schroyer. Sure it won’t be anytime soon, but in the next two years is reasonable. Will Wade expresses his loyalty to Schroyer to a degree you’d never believe—his reasoning is simple, Schroyer stuck his neck out for him when no one else would.
Posted by Ellis_Hugh
Member since Feb 2023
749 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:01 pm to
From what I understand around here, Schroyer is a cancer. I can’t think of one person I’ve ever talked to that has anything good to say about him. It’s a small town…
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
31674 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:04 pm to
quote:

Heath Schroyer


If this is the AD choice we are fuuuuuucked.
He would be brought in to be a hatchet man and slash budget. Goodbye any real chance at success in any sports in the current NIL landscape.
Posted by saintsfan22
baton rouge
Member since May 2006
78046 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

If you actually know and/or have had a real conversation Coach Will Wade, you will know that Schroyer was who actually pioneered that relationship. Schroyer went against the conservative leaders, including even Rousse, then ultimately sold WW to the leadership

Taking a chance on Wade was not a bold move. It was all upside because they couldn't get shittier. It's also unrepeatable as evidence by them just promoting up once Wade left.
Posted by TheSHU
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jan 2010
1141 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

My Picks & Why:
—Dr. Wade Rousse for President:
—Heath Schroyer for Athletic Director


Welcome to TD, Governor!
Posted by Sissidog02
Member since Jan 2020
6648 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:12 pm to
Then that’s exactly what these greasy people running this dumpster want:
Hatchet Man to do dirty deeds
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
16962 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:13 pm to
President: James Dalton - current VP and Provost at Alabama

AD: Josh Brooks - current Georgia AD

After Rousse in an interview pretty much said that he has no goals or directions for the university, but if the Board gives him 4 or 5 things to do he'll work on those. That's a no. The president of a major university system is too important to be a yes man for a bunch of unelected and elected politicians.
Posted by LSBoosie
Member since Jun 2020
16369 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:14 pm to
The majority of the people on here know nothing about either of those people or any of the other candidates.
Posted by Adajax
Member since Nov 2015
8033 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:15 pm to
Sounds like AI wrote that.
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
31674 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:17 pm to
Agreed.
Dalton for Pres
Alford at FSU for AD ( since Brooks already shot it down )
But really any AD or asst AD from a major university. Can't be a hatchet man from a FCS school
Posted by Former_5_Star
Member since Sep 2025
140 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:19 pm to
We’re getting McNeese States bums. No need to speculate.
Posted by Adam Banks
District 5
Member since Sep 2009
36204 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

After Rousse in an interview pretty much said that he has no goals or directions for the university, but if the Board gives him 4 or 5 things to do he'll work on those




Seriously?



That’s ridiculous
Posted by CDawson
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2017
19116 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

If this is the AD choice we are fuuuuuucked. He would be brought in to be a hatchet man and slash budget. Goodbye any real chance at success in any sports in the current NIL landscape.


How exactly are you concluding this?
Posted by KamaCausey_LSU
Member since Apr 2013
16962 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Alford at FSU for AD ( since Brooks already shot it down )
But really any AD or asst AD from a major university. Can't be a hatchet man from a FCS school

Didn't realize Brooks already said no. I agree, especially with revenue share starting, the next AD needs to come from a major university who is used to dealing with a budget of LSU's size.
Posted by Handsome Pete
Member since Apr 2019
2194 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

We’re getting McNeese States bums. No need to speculate.
This. That's how Landry wants it.
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
18296 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Taking a chance on Wade was not a bold move. It was all upside because they couldn't get shittier. It's also unrepeatable as evidence by them just promoting up once Wade left.
I mostly agree with you, but why was he toxic to other programs besides McNeese?
Posted by SWTiger81
Member since Jan 2025
24 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Schroyer is a cancer


Share more on this—detail
Posted by jcole4lsu
The Kwisatz Haderach
Member since Nov 2007
31674 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:26 pm to
You don't bring in the governor's lackies at both Prez and AD if you aren't intending on taking drastic budget action. FCS to LSU is a massive jump in budget responsibility for an AD, there is no way on earth he would be in the to 10 most qualified candidates to even apply.

You guys want to keep your head in the sand then fine, but I'm going down kicking and screaming
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
18296 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:28 pm to
I’m ok with Rousse, I’d like a different AD though. Rousse at least has experience as a college president even if it’s at McNeese. Tate had none as a president and was the first hire without that experience since the 1970s. When people say Rousse is a DEI hire from Louisiana I have to laugh.
This post was edited on 11/1/25 at 1:32 pm
Posted by SWTiger81
Member since Jan 2025
24 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

If this is the AD choice we are fuuuuuucked. He would be brought in to be a hatchet man and slash budget. Goodbye any real chance at success in any sports in the current NIL landscape.


I don’t see this being the issue. Look at McNeese’s athletic budget. Sure, it’s apples & oranges, but nothing about that budget was slashed.

It’s either you cut costs or make more money. Schroyer seems to have taken the ‘make more money’ approach by way of corporate sponsorships, NIL deals & media deals.

McNeese had to be a hard school to raise money for, no comparison to LSU. McNeese Athletics was broke with zero recognition, lacked local, state & national significance, all while the bulk of the “blow up” era took place between 2020-2023.

I don’t see Schroyer bringing the same selling style to LSU if he gets chosen. LSU has much more quality strengths to sell donors on but the biggest thing is engagement. Both Schroyer & Rousse have mastered that component. Look at the attendance rates before their time & now. It’s something to note.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram