- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Canadian court rules gives private land to Indians, homeowners now face possible eviction
Posted on 10/26/25 at 1:23 pm
Posted on 10/26/25 at 1:23 pm
quote:
The mayor of a picturesque city has warned homeowners they could soon lose their properties after a Canadian court ruled the land belongs to a native tribe.
The British Columbia Supreme Court awarded the Cowichan Tribes an Aboriginal title over roughly 800 acres of land in the city of Richmond, a suburb of Vancouver.
The tribe was also given an Aboriginal right to fish for food, according to the court's August 2025 ruling which was reviewed by the Daily Mail.
quote:
The ruling further declared that private ownership by the federal government and city of Richmond would be 'defective and invalid.'
The declaration was suspended for 18 months so that the tribe, federal government and city would have the 'opportunity to make the necessary arrangements.'
But Richmond Mayor Malcolm Brodie has now penned a letter warning residents that the ruling 'could negatively affect title' of their homes and 'compromise the status and validity of your ownership.'
He urged residents to attend an upcoming information session being held by the city where they can learn more about this 'important situation,' according to the letter obtained by the Daily Mail.
quote:
The Cowichan Tribe has also filed an appeal claiming ownership of further land in the region, Brodie's letter revealed.
[quote]The so-called Lands of Tl'uqtinus is currently home to private residents, small farms, a golf course and several industrial operations.
quote:
The tribe wanted to have ownership of the land returned to them, but did not seek that titles of privately held properties be declared invalid.
The court, however, ruled that granting private property ownership rights would 'unjustifiably infringe' on Cowichan Aboriginal title, the August 2025 decision stated.
The court further ruled that issues surrounding titles would need to be resolved through negotiation, litigation or purchase, otherwise the properties would remain under Cowichan title lands.
Daily Mail
Posted on 10/26/25 at 1:26 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Canadian court rules gives private land to Indians, homeowners now face possible eviction
Posted on 10/26/25 at 1:28 pm to Darth_Vader
Reminder:
Prior to the arrival of Europeans, native Americans had no concept of land ownership or private property, which is a Greco-Roman creation.
If you were to go to North America in, say, 1256 AD and ask a Native American tribe currently residing by the Hudson River if they “own” the land, they would have no clue what you are talking about. They would say “well, we are on this land now, and because we like it, we would defend it if another tribe tries to take it, but that tribe would be within their rights to fight us for it”
Prior to the arrival of Europeans, native Americans had no concept of land ownership or private property, which is a Greco-Roman creation.
If you were to go to North America in, say, 1256 AD and ask a Native American tribe currently residing by the Hudson River if they “own” the land, they would have no clue what you are talking about. They would say “well, we are on this land now, and because we like it, we would defend it if another tribe tries to take it, but that tribe would be within their rights to fight us for it”
Posted on 10/26/25 at 1:38 pm to Darth_Vader
The current thinking is quite interesting and hypocritical:
Bad: Migration and replacement/conquering from 15th to 19th centuries.
Good: Migration and replacement/conquering from late-20th century to present.
Bad: Migration and replacement/conquering from 15th to 19th centuries.
Good: Migration and replacement/conquering from late-20th century to present.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 1:41 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Prior to the arrival of Europeans, native Americans had no concept of land ownership or private property
They were nomadic savages before the Europeans conquered them. All of this virtue signaling stems from utter ignorance, as usual.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 1:42 pm to Sasquatch Smash
quote:
Bad: Migration and replacement/conquering from 15th to 19th centuries.
Good: Migration and replacement/conquering from late-20th century to present.
It's only bad when you (WASP) do it.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 1:53 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
Reminder:
Prior to the arrival of Europeans, native Americans had no concept of land ownership or private property, which is a Greco-Roman creation.
If you were to go to North America in, say, 1256 AD and ask a Native American tribe currently residing by the Hudson River if they “own” the land, they would have no clue what you are talking about. They would say “well, we are on this land now, and because we like it, we would defend it if another tribe tries to take it, but that tribe would be within their rights to fight us for it”
This is all correct, in addition to the fact that many murdered each other in tribal wars to take the land, as well as intra-tribal leadership conflicts. If I lived in BC, I'd immediately find another tribe that possessed the land in question a century prior and sponsor them to take it from the current tribe.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 1:58 pm to Darth_Vader
Sorry a boot that, ey bud?
Posted on 10/26/25 at 2:18 pm to Darth_Vader
Regina v Ojibway. Canadian appellate court. A horse is a horse of course of course…unless it is a bird.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 2:37 pm to Darth_Vader
I only hope it's a bunch of wacky, judgmental, Canadian liberals that lose their home.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 2:41 pm to Darth_Vader
On an unrelated note, liquor sales about to explode
Posted on 10/26/25 at 3:49 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
quote:
The mayor of a picturesque city has warned homeowners they could soon lose their properties after a Canadian court ruled the land belongs to a native tribe.
The British Columbia Supreme Court awarded the Cowichan Tribes an Aboriginal title over roughly 800 acres of land in the city of Richmond, a suburb of Vancouver.
The tribe was also given an Aboriginal right to fish for food, according to the court's August 2025 ruling which was reviewed by the Daily Mail.
quote:
The ruling further declared that private ownership by the federal government and city of Richmond would be 'defective and invalid.'
The declaration was suspended for 18 months so that the tribe, federal government and city would have the 'opportunity to make the necessary arrangements.'
But Richmond Mayor Malcolm Brodie has now penned a letter warning residents that the ruling 'could negatively affect title' of their homes and 'compromise the status and validity of your ownership.'
He urged residents to attend an upcoming information session being held by the city where they can learn more about this 'important situation,' according to the letter obtained by the Daily Mail.
quote:
The Cowichan Tribe has also filed an appeal claiming ownership of further land in the region, Brodie's letter revealed.
[quote]The so-called Lands of Tl'uqtinus is currently home to private residents, small farms, a golf course and several industrial operations.
quote:
The tribe wanted to have ownership of the land returned to them, but did not seek that titles of privately held properties be declared invalid.
The court, however, ruled that granting private property ownership rights would 'unjustifiably infringe' on Cowichan Aboriginal title, the August 2025 decision stated.
The court further ruled that issues surrounding titles would need to be resolved through negotiation, litigation or purchase, otherwise the properties would remain under Cowichan title lands.
Daily Mail
The moral of this story:
FA and buy property in Canada, then you will FO.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 4:00 pm to Darth_Vader
This is how you start a civil war.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 4:11 pm to Darth_Vader
Given the insane property/housing prices and crisis in Canada, 800 acres near Vancouver is a shite ton of private money at stake.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 4:18 pm to Darth_Vader
Are the new "owners" going to reimburse the previous owners for the last few hundred years of property taxes?
If the Indians owned the land and therefore they owed no property taxes, when can the current owners expect reimbursement for the taxes forced on them by the Feds with no jurisdiction?
If the Indians owned the land and therefore they owed no property taxes, when can the current owners expect reimbursement for the taxes forced on them by the Feds with no jurisdiction?
Posted on 10/26/25 at 6:16 pm to beachdude
quote:
Ojibway
The best Canadian tribe.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 6:33 pm to Tchefuncte Tiger
Not in Canada.
They've already lost.
They've already lost.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 6:41 pm to Darth_Vader
Sounds good, I hear Martha’s Vineyard was Indian land.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 6:42 pm to Darth_Vader
May be time to build another wall.
Posted on 10/26/25 at 6:44 pm to GruntbyAssociation
quote:
Sounds good, I hear Martha’s Vineyard was Indian land.
Ben and Jerry's headquarters too. And that land isn't just indigenous land but if you follow the paper trail it really was stolen.
Popular
Back to top


17








