- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Don't let Democrats memory hole Charlie
Posted on 10/24/25 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 10/24/25 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 10/24/25 at 7:54 pm to March1st
Trump really should name the new addition as the Charlie Kirk Ballroom.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 7:56 pm to March1st
Neither him, nor Iryna
[link=(Charlotte light rail stabbing victim 'immortalized' in name of butterfly species - ABC News https://share.google/CDEGPt91crzBMZTHb)]not forgotten[/link]
[link=(Charlotte light rail stabbing victim 'immortalized' in name of butterfly species - ABC News https://share.google/CDEGPt91crzBMZTHb)]not forgotten[/link]
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:01 pm to March1st
Yep we can’t let dems memory hole their murder of an innocent man
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:12 pm to MMauler
quote:
Trump really should name the new addition as the Charlie Kirk Ballroom.
Perhaps KIRK Memorial Auditorium
Not sure I'd want to give the angry mob the Ballroom moniker to bandy about. Auditorium gives a broader civic definition for it's use as well. Plus, wouldn't want Bill Clinton getting ideas should he be invited to attend a function there.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:13 pm to MMauler
quote:No, he shouldn't. Nice guy, very helpful to MAGA, tragic death but he's not at white house ballroom naming level.
Trump really should name the new addition as the Charlie Kirk Ballroom.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:16 pm to March1st
Friend, that is NOT a flattering picture of Mr. Kirk. Makes him look a LOT like Beavis' best bud.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:19 pm to blueboy
quote:Nice to see sanity (realism) in the face of the tidal wave of Kirk canonization.quote:No, he shouldn't. Nice guy, very helpful to MAGA, tragic death but he's not at white house ballroom naming level.
Trump really should name the new addition as the Charlie Kirk Ballroom.
He was a pundit. A nice guy and a VERY polite pundit, but just a pundit nonetheless.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:25 pm to March1st
I will never really get over it, it was such a perfect demonstration of the worst of us taking the best of us, amplified by the soulless celebrations. It is one of the darkest and most culturally significant murders in American history on par with MLK and JFK. And it makes the Left smile. The unfairness of it shocked me at the deepest spiritual level.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:28 pm to blueboy
quote:
No, he shouldn't. Nice guy, very helpful to MAGA, tragic death but he's not at white house ballroom naming level.
In the annals of history his assassination, the millions lives he touched and freedom his message provided the entire world rates far higher. You're just failing to see it apparently. Perhaps it's because his life was taken, but his worth to mankind continues to grow.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:29 pm to March1st
It’s time for him to be back in the news with the dems claiming we’re the ones who don’t care….
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:31 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Friend, that is NOT a flattering picture of Mr. Kirk. Makes him look a LOT like Beavis' best bud.
Perhaps, but the image is the beginning of a video, I didn't do the editing.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:31 pm to March1st
quote:Time will tell.
In the annals of history his assassination, the millions lives he touched and freedom his message provided the entire world rates far higher. You're just failing to see it apparently. Perhaps it's because his life was taken, but his worth to mankind continues to grow.
I suspect that in a generation not one person in twenty will even recognize his name, much less remember any details about him.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:35 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
Kinda like the George Floyd Square
Geez
Geez
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:45 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
He was a pundit. A nice guy and a VERY polite pundit, but just a pundit nonetheless.
You've got a very unique take on things, perhaps the next time you take a shower you'll feel like you're walking on water because you put Charlie Kirk's ministry into blue hair perspective. None the less, nice try at memory holing Charlie's Truth.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:57 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
Time will tell.
I suspect that in a generation not one person in twenty will even recognize his name, much less remember any details about him.
Well then, obviously there is a sacred imperative to provide the herd of future blue hairs links to lucidity.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 8:59 pm to March1st
Charlie will remain an American favorite, for those who are real Americans.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 9:00 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
quote:
I suspect that in a generation not one person in twenty will even recognize his name, much less remember any details about him.
You HOPE.
Posted on 10/24/25 at 9:01 pm to Lsupimp
quote:
will never really get over it, it was such a perfect demonstration of the worst of us taking the best of us, amplified by the soulless celebrations. It is one of the darkest and most culturally significant murders in American history on par with MLK and JFK. And it makes the Left smile. The unfairness of it shocked me at the deepest spiritual level.
Beautifully said.
He is a true martyr. Ive been unable to put in a good days work since I saw that footage. Im still a mess. Its existential for me realizing that im considerably further right than CK was, meaning that ~ 33% of the country would want ME dead.
I am just now trying to get back in a rhythm at the gym. Hoping work comes next.
This post was edited on 10/24/25 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 10/24/25 at 9:03 pm to March1st
quote:And there is the canonization that I referenced above.
Charlie Kirk's ministry ... Charlie's Truth.
I've nothing against the guy. If we'd met, I probably would have liked him. Seems like the sort of fellow with whom you could discuss any topic and walk away as friends, agree or disagree on said topic.
But you are vastly over-estimating his long-term effect upon society. If you and I are both still around in twenty years, we can revisit the question and compare notes.
Popular
Back to top

7








