- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Food for thought - suppose homosexualty (alphabetism generally) is genetic
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:18 am
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:18 am
Would aborting a child with those genetic markers be okay to the pro-choice crowd?
Would they be okay with pre-natal genetic therapies to "cure" the condition?
Would they be okay with pre-natal genetic therapies to "cure" the condition?
29
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:21 am to udtiger
Their “right” to murder babies trumps all.
This post was edited on 10/23/25 at 9:22 am
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:21 am to udtiger
Pro Abortion is such a money making scheme that even chipping away at it with such rationalization would be seen as Anti Abortion.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:21 am to udtiger
quote:
Would aborting a child with those genetic markers be okay to the pro-choice crowd?
I'm convinced we stopped looking for a gay gene for this very reason.
quote:
Would they be okay with pre-natal genetic therapies to "cure" the condition?
No. They'd call any parents who made this correct choice a bigot.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:23 am to udtiger
"No" to the first question. It is an innocent child that deserves to live. "No" to the 2nd question as well. I'm not in favor of hokus pokus with the human body The child will be born how it was supposed to be born.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:24 am to udtiger
Then the pendulum swings back to - “it’s my choice; you fascist.”
You’ll never convince them.
You’ll never convince them.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:27 am to udtiger
I'm open to it being a natural anomaly in very, very, rare cases.
If nature can make this turtle, then a natural gay is not that far fetched. But I think the majority of those claiming to be in this category today have been brainwashed into it.
If nature can make this turtle, then a natural gay is not that far fetched. But I think the majority of those claiming to be in this category today have been brainwashed into it.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:29 am to udtiger
If it were genetic, identical twins would both be of the same persuasion.... there are numerous anecdotal cases on one being one way and the other a different way......
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:29 am to TrueTiger
quote:
a natural gay
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:29 am to udtiger
Well they killing a bunch of black kids and seem to be happy about it so I guess that would be fine also.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:31 am to TrueTiger
quote:
a natural gay
They're real and they're spectacular.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:32 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
They're real and they're spectacular.
I'm not entirely sure. But I can't rule it out.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:33 am to udtiger
I have an interesting gay story.
So I'm good acquaintances with a lady and her husband - both are white and uber wealthy due to both of their hard work in creating a business they sold for a gazillion bucks.
They had two children. Both of their children were gay.
And both of their children had major drug problems.
And both of their drug addled children died..........
of AIDS.
So I'm good acquaintances with a lady and her husband - both are white and uber wealthy due to both of their hard work in creating a business they sold for a gazillion bucks.
They had two children. Both of their children were gay.
And both of their children had major drug problems.
And both of their drug addled children died..........
of AIDS.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:34 am to udtiger
We don't need 'more' Homosexuals just like we don't need 'more' low iq Americans who are on every single welfare and entitlement program know to man. Imagine our welfare state that is already bursting at the seams without abortion. It would be significantly larger and even more unaffordable than it already is.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:34 am to udtiger
Modern science can determine a lot of things about a fetus in early stages of pregnancy. Their sexual preferences as adults is not one of them. So, I'd say 'No' to that abortion. However, we can now tell parents that brain issues will cause your child to be born mentally retarded. I think abortion is justified since we've documented the bad impact it has on ignored siblings who will actually be productive members of society.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:39 am to idlewatcher
quote:
They had two children. Both of their children were gay.
Statistically speaking, it’s most likely that both children were abused rather than “naturally gay”
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:42 am to udtiger
quote:
Would aborting a child with those genetic markers be okay to the pro-choice crowd?
Would they be okay with pre-natal genetic therapies to "cure" the condition?
Oh for fricks sake, no.
I've witnessed first hand that for most people, homosexuality is something they're born with. Whether they practice it or not is their choice.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:47 am to udtiger
quote:
suppose homosexuality (alphabetism generally) is genetic
I am more than fatigued over this tripe. The Left has been trying to claim the homosexuality is genetic for decades and not once have they found a marker to even remotely indicate this could possibly be the case in even one instance. So, if we're going to play this game and claim that homosexuality is genetic and shouldn't be considered aberrant behavior, then I would like to suggest that racism is also a genetic trait.
Can we please just stop with this bullshite?
And, as a further remark, your effort to find a way to justify the abortion of a human child ain't gonna gain enny traction here with that weak attempt.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:57 am to Swamp Angel
quote:
And, as a further remark, your effort to find a way to justify the abortion of a human child ain't gonna gain enny traction here with that weak attempt.
How am I justifying abortion? I am presenting a question that calls on the pro-choice crowd to put their money where their mouths are. If it's truly a woman's right to choose and the rights of the child be damned, then they will have made complete enemies of the alphabet people.
Posted on 10/23/25 at 9:58 am to udtiger
quote:Either the child is a living human being with inherent value and dignity to be preserved, or it is not. If it is, then ending its life should not be arbitrary based on the whims of its parents or others. If it isn't, then it doesn't matter the reason for killing it.
Would aborting a child with those genetic markers be okay to the pro-choice crowd?
Would they be okay with pre-natal genetic therapies to "cure" the condition?
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News