- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If revealing all the uncensored Epstein files meant countries could fall, is it worth it?
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:29 am
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:29 am
Meaning exposing high level individuals and exposing an international pedophile ring with the very highest level of politicians, celebrities, leading CEO’s in major businesses, etc. Leading to worldwide rage and revolution….is it worth?
frick YES. By a mile.
frick YES. By a mile.
17
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:29 am to Geekboy
I’m not seeing the downside? You can’t threaten me with things I want.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:34 am to Geekboy
I want to say yes... but honestly, there is a threshold of "fallout" that modern society may not be able to withstand- I mean, entire countries?
The victims could speak names if they chose to- they even said they would.
Why didn't they?
The victims could speak names if they chose to- they even said they would.
Why didn't they?
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:35 am to Geekboy
Would anything change if we had proof that politicians were pedophiles? Don’t we already assume that’s true?
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:35 am to kingbob
Any country that had ‘officials’ that got away with covering something like this up, if it were indeed true, and many other high up persons were in on the cover up or knowingly turned a blind eye, then by definition the government of that country would be pure evil, worthy of destruction.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:36 am to Geekboy
You have blown this up in your imagination and are looking ridiculous.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:36 am to Geekboy
Absolutely.
Protecting these slugs should be a criminal offense.
Protecting these slugs should be a criminal offense.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:36 am to Geekboy
Yes.
Next question.
Next question.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:47 am to Geekboy
If a given country is so shaky that taking out a few shitty pedophile rapists can bring it crashing down it wasnt much of a country to begin with.
ETA: We can say the same for any number of "business as usual" crimes committed by the ruling class. If it cannot survive an accounting of its crimes......well, it never should have been allowed the power it has.
ETA: We can say the same for any number of "business as usual" crimes committed by the ruling class. If it cannot survive an accounting of its crimes......well, it never should have been allowed the power it has.
This post was edited on 10/14/25 at 11:50 am
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:48 am to Geekboy
Proof that almost all our leaders are blackmailed would expose the illusion of self-governance.
So you probably right.
So you probably right.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:51 am to Geekboy
Mike Johnson was asked about Epstein today. He said there are nearly 1.000 girls involved and vast majority do not want their names out there. Basically there are tens of thousands of files to go through to block their names and files are being released as they do it. But they can’t just release everything as is until names are taken out.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:51 am to kingbob
quote:
I’m not seeing the downside? You can’t threaten me with things I want.
You ready for the fallout bro?
You think you're still going to the grocery store to buy a gallon of milk or chicken breast?
I'm for it, I'm prepared. The last 100 years of human evolution is the lie, it's not that status quo. Humans for our existence are savages.
As long as everyone understands the negative consequences they are signing up for then let's go, let's reveal it all.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:52 am to SallysHuman
quote:
The victims could speak names if they chose to- they even said they would. Why didn't they?
This is the question I’ve always had. The church abuse victims (or at least many of them) spoke up and named names. Why not here? I suspect it’s because most of the “victims” were consenting adults who were being paid.
This post was edited on 10/14/25 at 12:22 pm
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:53 am to Geekboy
quote:
If revealing all the uncensored Epstein files meant countries could fall, is it worth it?
100%
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:54 am to Geekboy
Yes. Even if the statute of limitations has expired, these perverts should be publicly humiliated and ridiculed whenever they step outside.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:56 am to Mushroom1968
quote:
Mike Johnson was asked about Epstein today. He said there are nearly 1.000 girls involved and vast majority do not want their names out there. Basically there are tens of thousands of files to go through to block their names and files are being released as they do it. But they can’t just release everything as is until names are taken out.
We have AI that can help with that now not to mention the power of the US government. This isn't some ambulance chaser holding these.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 11:58 am to boogiewoogie1978
quote:
We have AI that can help with that now not to mention the power of the US government. This isn't some ambulance chaser holding these.
I don’t know if AI is quite there yet to be perfect with it. I mean, you can’t just tell it to block names because then you are blocking names of possible pedophiles. Or if the girl has an unusual name it may not be blocked. There’s also presumably innocent people who have met Epstein who’s reputation can be ruined even if they had no idea about his abuses or took no part in it.
Posted on 10/14/25 at 12:00 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:
This is the question I’ve always had. The church abuse victims (or al least many of them) spoke up and named names. Why not here? I suspect it’s because most of the “victims” were consenting adults who were being paid.
I’ve asked the same exact thing. I mean didn’t they have victims hold a press conference demanding release of the files? Couldn’t they easily have said that Trump and Stephen Hawking spit roasted them? They gave Gavin Newsome a blumpkin?
Posted on 10/14/25 at 12:01 pm to Geekboy
The only real question.
Is it a two tiered justice system, or one?
Is it a two tiered justice system, or one?
Posted on 10/14/25 at 12:03 pm to The Easter Bunny
quote:
Would anything change if we had proof that politicians were pedophiles? Don’t we already assume that’s true?
There is a difference in thinking it and having proof. With proof, you then have to bring about justice if a crime is committed …if our justice system is worth a shite.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News